1 / 15

Quantum Theory or Mechanics Quantum = quantity or amount Consciousness Is the universe conscious?

Quantum Theory or Mechanics Quantum = quantity or amount Consciousness Is the universe conscious? Does observation influence Reality?. Crux of the Issue. Assume Box of Sox: gazillion white gazillion black Classial Physics: Prob (pair) = ½

Download Presentation

Quantum Theory or Mechanics Quantum = quantity or amount Consciousness Is the universe conscious?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quantum Theory or Mechanics Quantum = quantity or amount Consciousness • Is the universe conscious? • Does observation influence Reality?

  2. Crux of the Issue Assume Box of Sox: gazillion white gazillion black Classial Physics: Prob (pair) = ½ 99+ confidence, 1000 drawings = 500 +/- 50 Quantum Theory: Prob (pair) = 1 Disclaimer; not real QM experiment; illustrative

  3. Quantum Mechanics – ConsciousnessOn-Line References & Points of View • The Conscious Universe: Menas Kafatos, Robert Nadeau. the discovery of non-locality as a new fact of nature allows us to “infer” although certainly not to “prove” that the universe can be viewed as a conscious system. • Human Consciousness and QM: we are part of a collective conscious. • An interesting site; http://www.integralscience.org/ConsciousQM.html • But the conclusion: let’s be kind to each other, we are one. • Debunking QM and Consciousness: the author debunks the mysticism associated with QM but fails to address the issue of nonlocality. • http://www.csicop.org/si/9701/quantum-quackery.html • A Cynics Point of View: Hey, it’s all about probabilities with no deeper meaning. • http://www.bowmain.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/QM/Quantum_Reality.htm#CCC

  4. Arguments for Consciousness • Anthropic Principle – see definition • Non-locality – Quantum Theory • Parallel Universes: if (big if) the universe is infinite, then identical copies of us in this room exist elsewhere • The Singularity – merger of man/computer • The Noosphere – Teilhard de Chardin

  5. QUANTUM THEORY - CLASSICAL PHYSICS - CONSCIOUSNESSIN A FEW WORDS • radiation is quantized; not infinitely divisible (Planck) • uncertainty: momentum x position = 1 (Heisenberg) • A particle exists everywhere until observed (Bohr) • Nonlocality – paired photons influence each other superluminality • Speed of light is a limiting boundary • Therefore, universe must be conscious (at least minimally) • Classical physics is local. Influence only within the constraints of the speed of light. Count paired particles independent of each other • QM: counts paired particles as dependent of each other • Experiments favor QM math (method of counting)

  6. Reductive Materialism: dominated experimental science during the 17th - 20th century. The search for ultimate causality in smaller and smaller bits of matter is finally a bootless enterprise. The further one goes down the scale of physical reality, the less material matter appears to be. The more reality seems to consist of nonmaterial information, pure potentialities of matter or energy but not quite either. . The role of the observer: the power of human consciousness not just to define but to influence physical reality, including the physical brain. To some this is heresy. • Complementarity: a single quantum mechanical entity can either behave as a particle or as wave, but never simultaneously as both; that a stronger manifestation of the particle nature leads to a weaker manifestation of the wave nature and vice versa. • The new Logical Framework of Complementarity: now the central feature of the Copenhagen Interpretation, which is now held to be the “orthodox” interpretation of quantum theory. • The unsettling conclusion forced upon us by complementarity, as Bohr understood it, is that the truths of science are not “revealed” truths. Scientific truths are like other truths are subjectively based. Cannot view all dimensions simultaneously.

  7. Newton 1643-1726 • Religious views • Three dimensions • Stuff is infinitely divisible, hence the Calculus • Math is intuitive and made sense • Max Planck 1858-1947 • Blackbody Radiation: energy was quantized (h), not infinitely divisible • Considered the founder of QM • Albert Einstein 1879-1959 • Particle nature of light, not infinitely divisible, arrives in packets, Nobel prize • Four dimensions, time is a variable dimension • God does not play dice with the Universe; reaction to QM • Neils Bohr 1885-1962 • Atomic structure; planetary system of orbits • Quanta–electrons in discrete orbits, jump from one to other, Nobel Prize • Math is not intuitive – probabilistic • Uncertainty Principle (Heisenberg). Momentum x Position = 1 • Copenhagen Interpretation of QM: now orthodox interpretation. Scientific truths are subjective not revealed truths

  8. Kurt Godel 1906-1978: Math is incomplete; it is fuzzy around the edges • The Bohr Einstein debates; nature of reality; objective or subjective; the role of consciousness and observation. The argument of hidden variables • John Bell 1928-1990: Bell’s Theorem • “concept of measurement is so fuzzy……needs something more fundamental” • Proved nature is nonlocal; with no hidden variables, 1964 • Bell’s Theorem: “the most profound in science” • Alain Aspect 1947- • Experiment, 1982 violated Bell’s inequalities thereby proving Bell’s Theorem, Gold Medal, and settling the Bohr-Einstein debate in favor of Bohr.

  9. Notes: • www.sfn//brainfacts • 2049: a single computer will be more powerful than the collective brainpower of human race. • ontology: study the nature of being, existence, reality • epistemology: nature of knowledge. Epistemological realism requires strict adherence to and regard for the rules and procedures for doing science. • metaphysics: ultimate nature of being and the world; includes cosmology and ontology. • Neils Bohr: the universe is presumed real independently of human observers or any acts of observation. Metaphysical realism. • Kurt Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem: no algorithm that demonstrates a mathematical proof can also prove its own validity

  10. A Brief History of Time; Stephen Hawking: the scientific world-view is such that a beliefs in the active presence of God or Being in the cosmos is rather effectively disallowed. Some argue not the case with existence of Nonlocality. • Nonlocality: In physics, nonlocality is a direct influence of one object on another, distant object, in violation of principle of locality. In classical physics, nonlocality in the form of action at a distance appeared in corpuscular theories and later disappeared in field theories. Action at a distance is incompatible with relativity. In quantum physics nonlocality re-appeared in the form of entanglement. • Physical reality of entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally together with the absence of local hidden variables. Entanglement is compatible with relativity; however, it prompts some of the more philosophically oriented discussions concerning quantum theory. More general nonlocality beyond quantum entanglement, but still compatible with relativity, is an active field of theoretical investigation but has yet to be observed

  11. Bell's theorem is a theorem that shows that the predictions of quantum mechanics (QM) are not intuitive, and touches upon fundamental philosophical issues that relate to modern physics. It is the most famous legacy of the late physicistJohn S. Bell. Bell's theorem is a no-go theorem, stating that: “No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics.” • Einstein was critical of the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. The EPR paper showed that the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics implies "spooky action-at-a-distance" and therefore is not a complete theory. Einstein wanted to get rid of the "action-at-a-distance" by introducing "local hidden variables." • Einstein pursued this goal for the rest of his life, between 1935 and 1955, and even after his death the problem seemed worth the effort of many persons, mainly theorists and philosophers. But finally, Bell's theorem, published in 1964, proved once and for all that the problem could be decided by experiments: it is possible to construct experiments in which it is impossible for any kind of interpretation based on "local hidden variables" to give the same predictions as quantum mechanics, providing a means of testing whether "action-at-a-distance" actually occurs.

  12. Multiple researchers have performed equivalent experiments using different methods. It appears most of these experiments produce results which agree with the predictions of quantum mechanics, leading to disproof of local-hidden-variable theories and proof of nonlocality. Still not everyone agrees with these findings. There have been two loopholes found in the earlier of these experiments, the detection loophole and the communication loophole with associated experiments to close these loopholes. After all current experimentation it seems these experiments uphold prima facie support for quantum mechanics' predictions of nonlocality. This theorem has even been called "the most profound in science.” • The Singularity: Ray Kurzweil. When humans and computers are integrated. ISBN: 0-670-03384-7 • The Spiritual Machine: When machines exceed human intelligence, Ray Kurzweil, ISBN: 0-670-88217-8 • Emperors of the New Mind, Roger Penrose, ISBN: 0-14-01.45346 • The Phenomenon of Man, Chardin, ISBN: 0-06-090495X • Evolving the Mind, A.G. Carins Smith, ISBN: 0-521-40220-4 • Kurzweil: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/ray_kurzweil_on_how_technology_will_transform_us.html

  13. Anthropic reasoning involves assessing these constraints by analyzing the properties of universes with different fundamental parameters or laws of physics from the current one, and has frequently concluded that essential structures, from atomic nuclei to the whole universe, depend, for stability, on delicate balances between different fundamental forces; balances which occur only in a small minority of possible universes — so that ours seems to be fine-tuned for life. Anthropic reasoning also attempts to explain and quantify this fine tuning. Within the scientific community the usual approach is to invoke selection effects from a real ensemble of alternate universes, which cause an anthropic bias in what can be observed.

More Related