Fish impingement and survival on fish friendly traveling water screens
Download
1 / 21

Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 113 Views
  • Uploaded on

Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens. Justin B. Mitchell APC Compliance Studies. Alabama Water Resources Association Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 07, 2012. Introduction.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens' - bianca


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Fish impingement and survival on fish friendly traveling water screens

Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly”Traveling Water Screens

Justin B. Mitchell

APC Compliance Studies

Alabama Water Resources Association Conference

Orange Beach, Alabama

September 07, 2012


Introduction
Introduction

Impingement- The death of fish and aquatic organisms that are pinned on the cooling water intake structure (CWIS).



Proposed impingement rule
Proposed Impingement Rule

  • Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act

    • Withdraw >2 MGD from waters of the US

    • >25% used for cooling purposes

  • Primary Compliance Options:

  • Cooling Towers

  • Intake velocity <0.5 fps

  • Traveling Screen Modifications and Biological Monitoring

    • Fish Buckets

    • Fish Return System

    • 48 hr Mortality Limit Criteria:

      Average annual mortality rate <12%

      Monthly maximum mortality rate <31%


Gorgas steam plant
Gorgas Steam Plant

  • Walker County, AL

  • Black Warrior River (Mulberry Fork)

  • 1,200 MW

  • 5 generating units

  • FGD (scrubber)

  • 2 separate CWIS

    • Units 6-7

    • Units 8-10


Gorgas approach
Gorgas Approach

SSI Band Screen Retrofit

  • Cost effective, $1.3M

  • Operationally feasible

  • Moribund fish (i.e. fish health) exceptions

  • Entrapment

  • Can this technology achieve the mortality limits?



Low and high pressure spray
Low and High Pressure Spray

Fish Trough

Debris Trough

Intake Flow



Study objectives
Study Objectives

  • Characterize Fish Impingement Rates

    • Debris trough

    • Fish trough

  • Evaluate Screen Operational Efficiency

  • Investigate 48 hr Latent Impingement Mortality

  • Examine Rates of Sick or Moribund Fish


Impingement samples collected to date
Impingement SamplesCollected to Date

  • Fish Return Trough

    Debris Trough

  • 3 8-hr sample/day

    • Day

    • Evening

    • Night

  • 4 days/week (Jan-Feb)

  • 2 days/biweek (Mar-Jun)

  • Total Samples = 72 8-hr samples/trough


Species diversity
Species Diversity

  • 5,300 fish

  • 30 species

  • 11 families

  • Recreationally Important spp.

  • Fragile spp.




Fish separation
Fish Separation

92.5%

87.6%

7.4%

12.4%


Survivability experimental design
Survivability Experimental Design

  • Biweekly Impingement

    Fish Return Trough only

  • Fish Collection

    2 days/week

  • 48 Hourly Latent Impingement Mortality (LIM) Observations


Other study components
Other Study Components

  • Water Quality

    • Intake

    • Aquaria system

  • CWIS Flow

    • Circ Pumps On, Unit offline

  • Intake Velocity

  • Weather and River

    Flow conditions


24 and 48 hr latent impingement mortality
24 and 48 hrLatent Impingement Mortality



Preliminary conclusions
Preliminary Conclusions

  • Impingement comprised mostly of shad

  • 24 hr and 48 hr Impingement Mortality > 12% Limit

    • Shad (89-100%)

    • Non-shad (20-60%)

  • Disease prevalence among all survival categories

  • LIM studies are time and labor intensive

  • Future Research: Explore ways to optimize impingement survival


Questions

Questions?

Justin Mitchell

(205)664-6184

[email protected]


ad