1 / 14

Social Process Theories for Delinquency

Social Process Theories for Delinquency. Historical Background. These theories reached their zenith in the 1960’s Self-report studies were revealing that crime was not limited to lower class It became necessary to develop a theory that could account for middle class crime as well.

benjamin
Download Presentation

Social Process Theories for Delinquency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Process Theories for Delinquency

  2. Historical Background • These theories reached their zenith in the 1960’s • Self-report studies were revealing that crime was not limited to lower class • It became necessary to develop a theory that could account for middle class crime as well.

  3. General Assumptions • Begin with the assumption that anyone is capable of committing a crime. • Argue that delinquency can be explained by the nature of socialization experiences of individuals • Hence, they tend to focus on the immediate social milieu of the individual--e.g., family, peer group, etc. • As such they focus on the processof becoming delinquent

  4. Types of Social Process Theories • Two broad types of process theories: • Social Learning Theories • Social Control Theories

  5. Social Process Theories I: Social Learning Theories

  6. Social Learning Theories • General Features • Children are not born with a tendency to want to do bad • Delinquency is a function of learning the norms, values and behaviors associated with delinquency • Without opportunities to learn the values and techniques associated with delinquency, individuals would not become delinquent

  7. Differential Association Theory • Developed by Edwin Sutherland • The theory: • Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons • Principle part of learning takes place in intimate personal groups • Learning includes: techniques of committing the crime and the drives, values and motives • Direction of drives and motives determined by relative “definitions” (influences) favorable or unfavorable to law violation • One becomes delinquent because of excess definitions favorable to violating the law • Differential associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity. • Process of learning delinquency involves same process as any other learning Edwin Sutherland

  8. Differential Reinforcement Theory • Developed by Ron Akers • Represents a synthesis between differential association and operant conditioning • The theory: • Behavior is reinforced with positive rewards • Rewards are given and evaluated in interaction with significant others • Hence, the kinds of behavior that are reinforced depend on one’s differential associations Ron Akers

  9. Drift and Neutralization Theory • The Drift Hypothesis • Delinquents do not strictly adhere to delinquent cultural values, but are affected by both criminal and conventional values • Hence, delinquents find themselves in “drift” between the two sets of values • Subculture of delinquency provides the delinquent with a vocabulary to neutralize the demands of conventional society • Techniques of Neutralization • Denial of responsibility • Denial of injury • Denial of victim • Condemnation of condemner • Appeal to higher loyalties Gresham Sykes

  10. Social Process Theories II: Social Control Theories

  11. General Assumptions • Human beings are predisposed toward maximizing self-interest • Hence, everyone has the capacity to commit crime • Most people don’t commit crime because of constraining influences • Hence, what is to be explained is not “Why do some people engage in delinquency?” but “Why do most people not engage in delinquency?”

  12. Containment Theory • Developed by Walter Reckless • The Theory • “Pressures” and “pulls” toward delinquency are everywhere • Counteracting these pressures and pulls are “containments” of which there are two types: • outer containments--structural buffers, such as intact family, positive discipline, etc. • inner containments--internalized values, high frustration tolerance, etc. • Reckless identified a positive self concept as the critical containment insulating against delinquency. Walter Reckless

  13. Social Bond Theory • Developed by Travis Hirschi • The Theory: • Assumes that all people have the capacity to be delinquent • Preventing most people from engaging in delinquency is a “bonding” to conventional society • Hirschi identifies 4 elements to the social bond (next slide)

  14. The Social Bond

More Related