Mary kickham samy reference renaissance conference denver co august 4 2008
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Balance of Power and Negotiation of Meaning in Virtual Reference Learning Environments PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 53 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Mary Kickham-Samy Reference Renaissance Conference Denver, CO August 4, 2008. Balance of Power and Negotiation of Meaning in Virtual Reference Learning Environments. Community of Inquiry Model: by Garrison, Anderson,& Archer. Literature Review.

Download Presentation

Balance of Power and Negotiation of Meaning in Virtual Reference Learning Environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Mary kickham samy reference renaissance conference denver co august 4 2008

Mary Kickham-Samy

Reference Renaissance Conference

Denver, CO

August 4, 2008

Balance of Power and Negotiation of Meaning in Virtual Reference Learning Environments


Community of inquiry model by garrison anderson archer

Community of Inquiry Model: by Garrison, Anderson,& Archer


Literature review

Literature Review

VR Librarian hesitating to instruct (Lee, 2004)

Students willing to be instructed (Desai and Graves, 2006)

92% - receptive

8% - “unreachable”


The theoretical framework

The Theoretical Framework

  • Critical Literacy Theory

  • Critical Information Literacy

  • Social Constructivist Theory


David ward measured session completeness by whether the librarian

David Ward measured session completeness by whether the librarian:

  • Asked student about number of sources,

  • Showed student a useful source,

  • Recommended search terms,

  • Checked that the student found the needed information


Summary of the literature

Summary of the Literature

  • Students are open to instruction.

  • Librarians want to provide instruction.

  • Students want to become independent learners.

  • VR environments are conducive to power-sharing relationships.


The main contribution of this paper is to examine

The main contribution of this paper is to examine

the activities and behaviors of the student and the librarian in the negotiation of questions and answers in a virtual reference session.


Research questions in two parts

Research Questions in Two Parts

Examination of

  • Balance in Participation and

  • Discourse Models - where they align, diverge and intersect


Questions one

Questions One

Is there parity of participation on the part of the librarian and the student?


Question two

Question Two

Does the number of questions asked during a session by the librarian, the student, or both parties combined affect the length of the transaction?


Question three

Question Three

Does the intensity of the student- librarian engagement predict the librarian’s assessment of the quality of the session?


Research design

Research Design

  • Data Source – 250 transcripts

  • Sampling – selected based on completeness of the transcripts and the demographics of the participants.


Research design variables

Research Design: Variables

  • Length of each session,

  • Librarian’s session-assessment

  • “Participation” variables, i.e. turns taken, questions asked, emoticons used.


Research design technique

Research Design: Technique

Analyses of descriptive statistics

Scatter plots, and

Tests for correlations and predictions.


Question one table 1 descriptive statistics for 7 variables

Question OneTable 1.Descriptive Statistics for 7 variables


Findings question one table 2 number of instances of librarian and student activities

Findings: Question OneTable 2. Number of Instances of Librarian and Student Activities.


Question two more questions shorter sessions

Question Two: More questions shorter sessions?

Scatter Plot


Question three parity and session assessment

Question Three: Parity and Session Assessment


What criteria do librarians use to evaluate a virtual reference session

What criteria do librarians use to evaluate a virtual reference session?

  • The amount of time spent?

  • The number of questions asked?

  • Emoticons used?

  • That perfect answer to a question?

  • Something else, not quantitative?


Balance of power and negotiation of meaning in virtual reference learning environments

How do the librarian and the student work together to answer research questions in virtual reference environments?


Critical discourse analysis

Critical Discourse Analysis

An analysis of the way language confers power on some members of society and controls other members.


James paul gee critical discourse analysis

James Paul Gee: Critical Discourse Analysis

Two discourses:

  • our native discourse and

  • our acquired discourses


Excerpt 1

Excerpt #1

Student: ty

Student: Thank you


Balance of power and negotiation of meaning in virtual reference learning environments

Transcript #2

Shared Discourse Model, Shared Vocabulary:

  • “user id,”

  • “password,”

  • “access.”


Balance of power and negotiation of meaning in virtual reference learning environments

Transcript #3-1

The librarian has an agenda. She tells the student what search terms and what databases to use. She also finds articles for the student.


Transcript 3 2

Transcript 3-2

After the librarian finds the answer, a relevant article, she relinquishes power to the student.


Balance of power and negotiation of meaning in virtual reference learning environments

Transcript #4-1

A student asks which term is more correct?

  • Michigander?

  • or Michiganian?


Balance of power and negotiation of meaning in virtual reference learning environments

Transcript 4-2

Two Discourse Models:

  • The discourse model of the linguist – How do you say it?

  • The discourse model of the librarian – What do sources say that we say?


Conclusion

Conclusion:

Students and librarians aligning their discourse models to create a new dynamic Virtual Reference Discourse Model


Bibliography

Bibliography

Desai, C.M. & Graves, S.J. (2006). Instruction via instant messaging reference: What's happening? The Electronic Library, 24(2), 174-189.

Doherty, J. J. & Ketchner, K. (2005). Empowering the intentional learner: A critical theory for information literacy instruction. Library Philosophy and Practice, 8(1), n.p.

Ellis, L. A. (2004). Approaches to teaching through digital reference. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 103-119.


Bibliography cont

Bibliography (cont.)

Gee, J.P. (2005). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis (2nd.). New York: Routledge.

Gee, J.P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses (3rd.). New York: Routledge.

Lee, I. J. (2004). Do virtual reference librarians dream of digital reference questions?: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of email and chat reference. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 35(2), 95-110.


Bibliography continued

Bibliography (continued)

Ward, D. (2003). Measuring the completeness of reference transactions in online chats. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(1), 46-52.

Westbrook, L. Virtual reference training: The second generation. College & Research Libraries, 67(3), 249-59.

Woodward, B.S. (2005). One-on-one instruction: from the reference desk to online chat. . Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(3), 203-209.


  • Login