1 / 15

Placement year feedback from students placed 2007/08

Dr Gary Farrell. Placement year feedback from students placed 2007/08. Overview. Course changes Student integration Sharing best practice Deviation from BSA procedures Variation in service provision/structure Student projects Student comments Student projects Unusual student experiences

badru
Download Presentation

Placement year feedback from students placed 2007/08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dr Gary Farrell Placement year feedbackfrom students placed 2007/08

  2. Overview • Course changes • Student integration • Sharing best practice • Deviation from BSA procedures • Variation in service provision/structure • Student projects • Student comments • Student projects • Unusual student experiences • Accreditation –service feedback and curriculum input

  3. Course changes • Nothing major last year • Proposed • Analogue aids – less • Digital aid programme and modification – more • Occulomotor testing – less • Communication skills and dealing with difficult/challenging patients • Aurical audiometry? • Effective masking? • What else is missing – curriculum review later

  4. Student integration 1 • Talk from year 3 student really useful • We expect contact from the student even a visit to you prior to placement • All students re-familiarise themselves with BSA recommended procedures prior to starting • A welcome pack with basic information is very useful to the student • Location of clinic protocols is also useful • Induction –earlier the better • Manual Handling? • Disabled, Dix-Hallpike, elderly frail – balance testing • 2nd Induction – how different – can it be tailored?

  5. Student integration 2 • Time at start to re-familiarise themselves with Practice Navigator/Auditbase and the aids used in the department – less so on second placement • We teach Auditbase and Spirit aids • Shadowing other staff was excellent ToD, HT, speech therapist ENT doctor etc • Visit to ENT surgery – great but not for the squeamish • They enjoy being part of the team • Journal clubs • Staff lunches • Staff meetings • Staff socials • Xmas party etc

  6. Sharing best practice • Most students see two different departments and compare and contrast • Courtesy telephone calls to reduce DNA rates • Effective timetabling of slots – admin staff induction into type of slot i.e. re-tube or re-assess • Noisy busy waiting rooms not a good first impression for hearing impaired • A tidy workplace is an efficient workplace • Quality of rooms and privacy of patients in shared rooms – ie storeroom in a patient interview room

  7. Deviation from BSA procedures or best practice • Some testing carried out in non-soundproof booths • Not using otostop for impressions and also undertaken when excessive wax and infection? • Doing open fit in last 5 mins of appointment without complete verification due to time constraints • Free field warble tones used on 4 year old when can possibly use headphones • NAL NL1 or DSL i/o – which is best for kids and why – YOU decide • Fully masked PTA in 5 mins! • Paediatricians cleanliness – a lot to be desired and lack of communication (hand washing)

  8. Variation in service provision • Routinely testing 3 and 6 kHz in PTA • Variable use of GHAB • REMs – when used and justification • REMs used for open fit? • Just fitting unilateral hearing aids – no option for patient to have bilateral aids • High proportion of click fits in a number of departments – is this the future or convenient • Management structure and style variable – this is good

  9. Variations from the students point • Students are not an imposition they are an asset • Students should not be talked down to in front of patients • Some departments could do with a lick of paint • Protocols varied and some out of date • “Clinical guidelines reduce unacceptable or undesirable variations in practice and provide a focus for discussion among health professions” • Availability of mentor and Head of Department • Time to enter or discuss logbook entries and achievements • 2nd placement – they are ready to go from the start

  10. Student comments • Overlap with inductions • Open door policy very useful • Cover at outstations not as good as central location • Lack of panic buttons • Whistleblowing policy • Support from University and tension! • Being with another student is much more settling – a buddy

  11. Student projects • Designing leaflets, poster displays or patient information sheets • Equipment operating instructions • Academic talk to staff or patient interest groups, audit guidelines, protocols and protocol updates • Essay on BAHAs, localisation (unilateral or bilateral aids), open fits, VEMPs, earmould modifications etc • Talk in a village Hall • Talk to Journal Club

  12. Unusual student experiences comments • Brighton Bells • Nurse arrested for child molestation • Arson attack and break in next door • “Do hospitals normally have shootings” • “Does audiometry affect pacemakers” • Dementia patients are a real challenge • I had to counsel the patients wife as she was more frustrated • The letters to PALS really show patient appreciation • What is CHARGE syndrome • Finding a mastoid cavity not spotted by the audiologis • Patient falling asleep during REMs • Kids love bubbles • Looking for toys in childrens ears – transformers and potatoes? • Testing the King of Tonga’s hearing

  13. Accreditation and curriculum • 5 year accreditation • 2 advocates • Student experience • Improvements over the years • Changes required • Curriculum development • Analogue aids – less • Digital aid programme and modification – more • Occulomotor testing – less • Communication skills and dealing with difficult/challenging patients • Aurical audiometry? • Effective masking?

  14. Final comment • When they come back from their placement year they are buzzing with confidence and enthusiasm. • They have matured and are more engaging and certainly have more clinical knowledge • That is primarily up to you and your staff • Thank you from us all

  15. Contact details • Dr Gary Farrell - Room 4087 ISVR • Tel 023 80594942 • E:mail gf@isvr.soton.ac.uk

More Related