- 66 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Lecture 25

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- Regression diagnostics for the multiple linear regression model
- Dealing with influential observations for multiple linear regression
- Interaction variables

- Assumptions of multiple linear regression:
- For each subpopulation ,
- (A-1A)
- (A-1B)
- (A-1C) The distribution of is normal
[Distribution of residuals should not depend on

]

- (A-2) The observations are independent of one another

- For each subpopulation ,

- Tools for checking (A-1A) and (A-1B)
- Residual plots versus predicted (fitted) values
- Residual plots versus explanatory variables
- If model is correct, there should be no pattern in the residual plots

- Tool for checking (A-1C)
- Histogram of residuals

- Tool for checking (A-2)
- Residual plot versus time or spatial order of observations

- Make scatterplot matrix of variables (using analyze, multivariate). Decide on whether to transform any of the explanatory variables. Check for obvious outliers.
- Fit tentative model.
- Check residual plots for whether assumptions of multiple regression model are satisfied. Look for outliers and influential points.
- Consider fitting richer model with interactions or curvature. See if extra terms can be dropped.
- Make changes to model and repeat steps 2-4 until an adequate model is found.

- Data set pollutionhc.JMP provides information about the relationship between pollution and mortality for 60 cities between 1959-1961.
- The variables are
- y (MORT)=total age adjusted mortality in deaths per 100,000 population;
- PRECIP=mean annual precipitation (in inches);
EDUC=median number of school years completed for persons 25 and older;

NONWHITE=percentage of 1960 population that is nonwhite;

HC=relative pollution potential of hydrocarbons (product of tons emitted per day per square kilometer and a factor correcting for SMSA dimension and exposure)

- In deciding whether to transform an explanatory variable x, we consider two features of the plot of the response y vs. the explanatory variable x.
- Is there curvature in the relationship between y and x? This suggests a transformation chosen by Tukey’s Bulging rule.
- Are most of the x values “crunched together” and a few very spread apart? This will lead to several points being very influential. When this is the case, it is best to transform x to make the x values more evenly spaced and less influential. If the x values are positive, the log transformation is a good idea.
- For the pollution data, reason 2 suggests transforming HC to log HC.

- Useful for detecting nonconstant variance; look for fan or funnel pattern.
- Plot of residuals versus predicted values ,
- For pollution data, no strong indication of nonconstant variance.

- Make plot of residuals vs. an explanatory variable by using Fit Model, clicking red triangle next to response, selecting Save Columns and selecting save residuals. This creates a column of residuals. Then click Analyze, Fit Y by X and put residuals in Y and the explanatory variable in X.
- Use these residual plots to check for pattern in the mean of residuals (suggests that we need to transform x or use a polynomial in x) or pattern in the variance of the residuals.

Residual plots look fine. No strong indication of nonlinearity or

nonconstant variance.

Normality looks okay. One residual outlier, Lancaster.

- As in simple linear regression, one or two observations can strongly influence the estimates.
- Harder to immediately see the influential observations in multiple regression.
- Use Cook’s Distances (Cook’s D influence) to look for influential observations. An obs. Has large influence if Cook’s distance is greater than 1.
- Can use Table, Sort to sort observations by Cook’s Distance or Leverage.
- For pollution data: no observation has high influence.

- Use Display 11.8
- Leverage of point: measure of distance between point’s explanatory variable values and explanatory variable values in entire data set.
- Two sources of influence: leverage, magnitude of residual.
- General approach: If an influential point has high leverage, omit point and report conclusions for reduced range of explanatory variables. If an influential point does not have high leverage, then the point cannot just be removed. We can report results with and without point.

- Obtaining leverages from JMP: After Fit Model, click red triangle next to Response, select Save Columns, Hats.
- Leverages are between 1/n and 1. Average leverage is p/n.
- An observation is considered to have high leverage if the leverage is greater than 2p/n where p=# of explanatory variables. For pollution data, 2p/n = (2*4)/60=.133

- Interaction variables
- Squared and higher polynomial terms for curvature
- Dummy variables for categorical variables.

- Interaction is a three-variable concept. One of these is the response variable (Y) and the other two are explanatory variables (X1 and X2).
- There is an interaction between X1 and X2 if the impact of an increase in X2 on Y depends on the level of X1.
- To incorporate interaction in multiple regression model, we add the explanatory variable . There is evidence of an interaction if the coefficient on is significant (t-test has p-value < .05).

- To add an interaction variable in Fit Model in JMP, add the usual explanatory variables first, then highlight in the Select Columns box and in the Construct Model Effects Box. Then click Cross in the Construct Model Effects Box.
- JMP creates the explanatory variable