1 / 30

Integration of Radiologists’ Feedback into Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems

Integration of Radiologists’ Feedback into Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems. Sarah A. Jabon a Daniela S. Raicu b Jacob D. Furst b a Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803 b School of Computing, CDM, DePaul Universtiy, Chicago, IL 60604. Overview. Introduction

ataret
Download Presentation

Integration of Radiologists’ Feedback into Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integration of Radiologists’ Feedback into Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems Sarah A. Jabona Daniela S. Raicub Jacob D. Furstb aRose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803 bSchool of Computing, CDM, DePaul Universtiy, Chicago, IL 60604

  2. Overview • Introduction • Related Work • The Data • Methodology • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Results • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Conclusions • Future Work

  3. Introduction • The 2008 official estimate • 215,020 cases diagnosed • 161,840 deaths will occur • Five-year relative-survival rate (1996 – 2004): 15.2% • Computer-aided diagnosis systems can help improve early detection

  4. Related Work • El-Naqa et al. • mammography images • neural networks and support vector machines • Muramatsu et al. • mammography images. • three-layered artificial neural network to predict the semantic similarity rating between two nodules • Park et al. • linear distance-weighted K-nearest neighbor algorithm to identify similar images

  5. Related Work • ASSERT by Purdue University • Content-based features: co-occurrence, shape, Fourier Transforms, global gray level statistics • Radiologists also provide features • BiasMap by Zhou and Huang • Relevance feedback, content-based features • Analysis: biased-discriminant analysis (BDA)

  6. The Data • Lung Image Database Consortium • Reduced 1,989 images down to 149 (one for each nodule) • Summarized the radiologists’ ratings (up to 4) into a single vector • Each nodule has 7 semantic based characteristics and 64 content-based characteristics

  7. Overview • Introduction • Related Work • The Data • Methodology • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Results • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Conclusions • Future Work

  8. Methodology

  9. Methodology: Simple Distance Metrics Semantic-Based Similarity Content-Based Similarity

  10. Simple Distance Metrics Content-Based Similarity Values (Euclidean) Semantic-Based Similarity Values (1 – Cosine)

  11. Methodology: Linear Regression

  12. Methodology: Principle Component Analysis • Content-Based Features: • 77 pairs with a correlation > 0.9 • 136 pairs with a correlation > 0.8 or < -0.8

  13. Scree Plots: 5 – 9 Matches

  14. Methodology: Principle Component Analysis • PCA on content-based features • accounts for 99% of the variance • 23 components • PCA on semantic-based characteristics • Method 1 • accounts for 92% of the variance • 4 components • Method 2 • accounts for 98% of the variance • 6 components

  15. Overview • Introduction • Related Work • The Data • Methodology • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Results • Simple Distance Metrics • Linear Regression • Principle Component Analysis • Conclusions • Future Work

  16. Results: Simple Distance Metric

  17. Matches: Nodule 117

  18. Simple Distance Metrics

  19. 5 – 9 Matches: PCA and Linear Regression

  20. Results: Linear Regression

  21. Results: Linear Regression

  22. Results: Linear Regression

  23. Results: Linear Regression

  24. Results: PCA

  25. Results: PCA

  26. Results: PCA

  27. RMSD – Percent of Range

  28. Example: Nodule 37 and Nodule 38

  29. Future Work • Perform the analysis only nodules on which all three radiologists agree • In order to address the small size of the data set, perform the analysis using a leave one out technique (instead of 2/3 training and 1/3 testing) • Incorporate relevance feedback into the system

  30. Questions?

More Related