1 / 16

Can ISPs be Profitable Without Violating Network Neutrality?

Can ISPs be Profitable Without Violating Network Neutrality?. Amogh Dhamdhere Constantine Dovrolis Georgia Tech. Disclaimer. This is not a game theory talk. The Network Neutrality Debate. Recent Trend: Large amounts of video and peer-to-peer traffic on the Internet

atalo
Download Presentation

Can ISPs be Profitable Without Violating Network Neutrality?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Can ISPs be Profitable Without Violating Network Neutrality? Amogh Dhamdhere Constantine Dovrolis Georgia Tech

  2. Disclaimer This is not a game theory talk Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  3. The Network Neutrality Debate • Recent Trend: Large amounts of video and peer-to-peer traffic on the Internet • Access Providers (AP) deliver content to users • Recent trend: Not profitable • Flat rates, commoditization of Internet access • Content providers (CP) generate the content • Profitable (think Google) • Tension between AP and CPs: “Network neutrality” debate • Traffic shaping/prioritization by ISPs Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  4. A Technical View • Previous work • Mostly non-technical • Emotional debates in the press, painting APs as villians • But what about the underlying problem: Non-profitability of Access Providers? • Our approach: A quantitative look at AP profitability • Investigate reasons for non-profitability • Evaluate strategies for the AP to increase profit Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  5. Modeling AP Profitability • Three AS types: AP, CP and transit provider (TP) • Focus on the AP • AS links • customer-provider (customer pays provider) • peering (no payments) • AP and CPs can transfer traffic either through customer-provider or peering links CP CP CP CP CP CP TP CP CP AP Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  6. Baseline model • AP and CP connect to the TP as customers • N users of AP, charged a flat rate R ($/month) • Flat rate prices decrease due to competition • Transit pricing: 95th percentile of traffic volume • 95th / mean = 2:1 for normal traffic, 4:1 for video1 • More video means higher transit payment by AP • AP users: Heavy tailed distribution of content downloaded per month • High variability in AP costs 1Norton’06: Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  7. AP Strategies – Charging • Charging strategies • AP charges “heavy hitters” according to volume downloaded • AP caps heavy hitters • AP charges CP (non-network neutral) • Charging strategies are disruptive • AP users may depart, depending on existing competition • Parameter d determines shape of departure probability curve • AP cannot control customer departure probability Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  8. AP Strategy – Charging Heavy Hitters • Threshold T to identify heavy downloaders • Charge “by volume” for heavy hitters • c(D) = D*R/T, where download amount D, threshold T, flat rate R • Customer departure probability depends on T and d • AP’s profit is sensitive to customer departure probability • For some values of d, no threshold gives larger profit than baseline !! Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  9. AP Strategies - Connection • Connection Strategies • AP caches content from CPs • AP peers selectively with CPs • Goal: Save transit costs paid to the transit provider • Does not increase the AP’s revenue • Non-disruptive • AP does not risk losing customers Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  10. AP Strategy – Cache CP Content • AP caches content from some CPs locally • Saves transit costs, as content is served locally • Increases local costs incurred by the AP • Critical parameters: Fraction of content that can be cached (h) and cost incurred for caching (s) • Live content cannot be cached! • Profit is sensitive to h, s Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  11. AP Strategies – Peering with CPs • Peering selectively with Content Providers can save transit costs, without risk of losing its users • But, peering is not free • Fixed, traffic dependent costs • Peering cost classes for CPs • “Low”: CPs at the same geographical location/IXP • “Medium”: CPs at nearby location/IXP • “Hard”: CPs in different continents • Cost benefit analysis: r = Estimated benefit/Estimated Cost • Peer if r > R Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  12. AP Strategies – Peering with CPs • Optimal point exists for the cost-benefit threshold R • AP controls the factor R • Significant reduction in AP costs with selective peering • Greater benefit with fewer CPs (more traffic from the largest CPs) • AP can leverage expansion by large CPs Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  13. Conclusions • Network Neutrality research should also focus on the underlying problem: Non-profitability of ISPs • How can ISPs be profitable in spite of increasing traffic, heavy-hitter users and video traffic ? • Charging schemes that target heavy hitters may not work in the presence of competition in the AP market • Profit highly sensitive to customer departure probability • Out of the AP’s control • Connection strategies such as peering selectively with Content Providers seem promising • Completely under the AP’s control Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  14. Thank You ! Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  15. AP Strategy – Capping Heavy Hitters • AP caps download rate for users • Limits the total amount of traffic handled • Saves transit costs and local costs, but does not increase revenue • AP profit depends on customer departure probability • For some values of d, no threshold gives larger profit than baseline !! • No significant improvement over baseline Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

  16. AP Strategy – Charging CPs • AP directly charges the top sources of content (CPs) • Increases revenue, but violates “network neutrality” • Subject to customer departure due to discriminatory practices • AP profit depends on customer departure probability Amogh Dhamdhere NetEcon 2008

More Related