1 / 13

Aceh and Yogjakarta Comparing international response to the crises

Aceh and Yogjakarta Comparing international response to the crises. Toshihiro Nakamura Team Leader, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit UNDP Indonesia. INDONESIA. Source: UNDP Indonesia; UNDP BCPR. Disaster event. Date. Number killed. Damage & losses (USD). Country.

arlen
Download Presentation

Aceh and Yogjakarta Comparing international response to the crises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Aceh and YogjakartaComparing international response to the crises Toshihiro NakamuraTeam Leader, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation UnitUNDP Indonesia

  2. INDONESIA Source: UNDP Indonesia; UNDP BCPR

  3. Disaster event Date Number killed Damage & losses (USD) Country COMPARING THE MAGNITUDES OF DISASTERS Turkey Earthquake April 1999 8,500 10,281 Aceh (Indonesia) Tsunami December 2004 165,708 4,747 Honduras Hurricane Oct 1998 14,600 4,698 Yogyakarta (Indonesia) Earthquake May 2006 5,716 3,134 Gujurat (India) Earthquake June 2001 20,005 2,958 Source: Preliminary Damage and Losses Assessment, Bappenas, 2006

  4. Before After EMERGING PATTERNS IN DISASTER RESPONSE • Immediate humanitarian assistance • Humanitarian coordination • HIC • UNDAC • Immediate humanitarian assistance • Humanitarian coordination • HIC • UNDAC Emergency relief • No framework for medium and longer term strategy • Damage and losses assessment (ECLAC) • Followed by reconstruction master plan development • DAD • Multi-donor Trust Fund • Coordination among and between UN and IFI Reconstruction Longer term development • MDGs

  5. Recovery Emergency relief & Recovery planning Rehabilitation Reconstruction RESPONDING TO YOGYAKARTA Time frame 1-2 months 2-12 months 7-24 months Key objective • To save lives • To rehabilitate basic services on: • To revitalize all system of Focus areas • Emergency response • Provision of food • Evacuation of the people • Debris cleaning • Provision of temporary settlement • Public services • Basic social services • Basic infrastructure • Basic economic infrastructure • Housing rehabilitation • Mental/psycho-social rehabilitation • Economic system • Transportation • Telecommunication • Social and cultural reconstruction • Institutional reconstruction Source: BAPPENAS

  6. Dec 2004 mid 2005 2009 Recovery programme overall management & implementation Emergency relief & Recovery planning Rehabilitation Reconstruction OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL RECOVERY STRATEGY Time frame - 6 months 6-12 months 1-3/5 years • Humanitarian relief • Recovery planning • Restoring the situation to the minimum level • Achieving improved conditions Key objective Focus areas • Emergency rescue • Emergency food and medical assistance • Emergency infrastructure and temporary shelter • Burying the bodies • Rubble clearing • Livelihood • Recovery planning • Public services • Economic facilities • Banking and financial institutions • Land rights • Law and order • Temporary shelter • Economy • Transportation system • Telecommunication system • Social and cultural system • Institutional capacity • Housing Key UNDP support • Overall UN coordination • Flash Appeal/Emergency Relief and Transitional Recovery Programme (ERTR) • Support to the Damage and Losses assessment • Support to the development of recovery blue print • Private sector partnership • Continuation of ERTR • Development and implementation of new programmeswith a focus on governance within the framework of the national recovery blueprint • Overall policy guidance Source: BAPPENAS; UNDP Indonesia

  7. National team • BAPPDA • Bappenas • International team • WB • UN • ADB DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT Aceh team Jakarta team Taskforce Taskforce 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Secretariat Secretariat Communication Source: UNDP Indonesia

  8. YOGYA DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT TEAM Source: Bappenas, 29 May 2006

  9. YOGYA DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT TEAM RESTRUCTURED Source: Bappenas, 29 May 2006

  10. ECLAC METHODOLOGY SUMMARY Basic information • Developed by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) since the 1970s • Valuate the socio-economic and environmental impact of a natural disaster • Applied in • Belize and Dominican Republic in 1998 • Venezuela in 1999 • El Salvador in 2001 • Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004 • Direct impact, which refers to the impact on assets, stock, property, valued at agreed replacement unit prices • Indirect impact, which refers to flows that will be affected, such as revenue, public and private expenditure etc over the time period until the assets are recovered There is no reference to ‘governance’ issue in the methodology handbook Source: Damage and Loss Assessment, BAPPENAS, January 2004; ECLAC handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters, ECLAC 2003

  11. RAW DATA LOOK LIKE THIS Source: Bappenas, 29 May 2006

  12. Funding source Estimated Amount (USD million) Grant or Loan? N/A Domestic funds 2,000 1,043 (on) 298 (off) Grant Loan Multilateral 1,341 857 (off) Grant Loan 1,366 (on) Bilateral 2,223 Grant NGO 2-3,000? TOTAL 4,254 (on) 3,155 (off) 7,409 Source: WB/UNDP Joint working paper for Pokja 10 (financial management), WB/UNDP, Jakarta, 2005

  13. INFORMATION PLATFORM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TSUNAMI • Programme and projects Reports • Procurement information Citizen’s corner • Pre-Tsunami sectoral information • Donor sites About e-Aceh • Government sites • Press release Source: WB

More Related