1 / 14

SCIENTOMETRICS Status and Prospects for development Moscow , 10-12 October 2013

The weight of research internationalization indicators Ülle Must Estonian Research Council ulle.must@etag.ee. SCIENTOMETRICS Status and Prospects for development Moscow , 10-12 October 2013. Visualizing Friendships.

arawn
Download Presentation

SCIENTOMETRICS Status and Prospects for development Moscow , 10-12 October 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The weight of research internationalization indicatorsÜlle MustEstonian ResearchCouncilulle.must@etag.ee SCIENTOMETRICS Status and Prospects for development Moscow, 10-12 October 2013

  2. Visualizing Friendships By Paul Butler, 13 December 2010http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/visualizing-friendships/469716398919

  3. Changingpublication and collaborationpattern Publisheddocuments 1996-2012 (inthousands) Research collaboration: % of documents with more than one country SCImago. (2007). SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank.Retrieved October 09, 2013, from http://www.scimagojr.com

  4. King, C. Multiauthor Papers: Onward and Upward. Retrieved July 1, 2013 from: http://sciencewatch.com/articles/multiauthor-papers-onward-and-upward

  5. Data and methods Peer Review survey • General information (field, country of affiliation, citizenship, gender, the profile as researcher); • Experience in the Peer Review process (as applicant or reviewer); • S&T indicators; • Criticismof Peer Review; • The future of the peer review system. • Respondents belong to 79 countries by nationality; their places of affiliation were in 66 countries. Among respondents, 1337 were men and 652 were women, 125 did not specify their gender. By academic position, postdoctoral research fellows (643) and full professors (422) constituted the largest share of respondents, followed by lecturers/assistant professors (325), associated professors (323). The largest numbers of respondents belong to natural sciences (1096).

  6. S&T indicators(Un-tyBased Res, 2010)

  7. The rating of the S&T indicators by country groups

  8. The rating of the S&T indicators by fields

  9. The rating of the S&T indicators by career

  10. The rating of the S&T indicators bygender

  11. Availability of data • Validity and reliability • Fittogoal • Stabilityand controllability • Economicefficiency • Availability and the cost of processing the raw data • Theusequality • The uniqueness and clarity of interpretation • The ability to influence the behavior and process

  12. Indicators validity by criteria

  13. Conclusions • Thechoiceof indicatorsdepend on the desired goal; • The range of indicators is broad, and the choice of individual indicators should meet certain criteria; • Variousindicators should be weighted differently in different fields, at different career stages; • Indicators have to be fit‐for‐purpose, appropriate and verifiable.

More Related