1 / 23

Models for Capital Creation in Technology-Mediated Learning

Models for Capital Creation in Technology-Mediated Learning. Standard Model. Capitalization Entity. Institution. Ownership Interest. Non-profit or Public Entity. For-Profit Entity. Fundamental Premises. Academic control remains with the Institution.

ansel
Download Presentation

Models for Capital Creation in Technology-Mediated Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Models for Capital Creationin Technology-MediatedLearning

  2. Standard Model Capitalization Entity Institution Ownership Interest Non-profit or Public Entity For-Profit Entity

  3. Fundamental Premises • Academic control remains with the Institution. • The capitalization entity cannot exercise control over the Institution. • The structure does not affect either accreditation or state authorization.

  4. Rights of the Capitalizaation Entity • The Institution’s intellectual property rules do not necessarily apply to the capitalization entity. • The capitalization entity can engage in non-credit, non-degree instructional services. • The capitalization entity can engage in the creation of credit and non-credit courseware.

  5. Economic Benefits to the Institution • Income stream from credit enrollments. • Royalty stream from use of brand (i.e. institution’s name and logo). • License revenue from use of courseware. • Share of net profits of capitalization entity. • Share in equity appreciation in capitalization entity.

  6. The Bifurcation Model Institution

  7. The Bifurcation Model For-Profit Operating Subsidiary All Non- Academic Functions Institution Creates All Academic Functions

  8. The Bifurcation Model For-Profit Operating Subsidiary Non-Academic Functions Institution Minority Owner Majority Owner Investor Academic Functions

  9. The Operating Subsidiary Model Institution

  10. The Operating Subsidiary Model Institution Creates Special Purpose For-Profit Entity $

  11. The Joint Venture Model For-Profit Partner Institution

  12. The Joint Venture Model For-Profit Partner Institution Ownership Interest Ownership Interest New For-Profit Venture

  13. The Common Enterprise Model Institution A Institution B

  14. The Common Enterprise Model Institution A Institution B Shared Governance Shared Governance New Non-Profit Entity

  15. The Common Enterprise Model Institution A Institution B Shared Governance Shared Governance New Non-Profit Entity Ownership $ New For-Profit Entity

  16. Services Model #1 For Profit Entity Builds Facility

  17. Services Model #1 For Profit Entity Institution Builds Creates Facility or Delivery System Curriculum

  18. Services Model #1 For Profit Entity Institution Builds Creates Facilityor Delivery System Delivers at Curriculum

  19. Services Model #2 For Profit Entity Creates “Turnkey” Curriculum

  20. Services Model #2 For Profit Entity Creates “Turnkey” Curriculum Institution Adopted by

  21. Services Model #2 For Profit Entity Creates “Turnkey” Curriculum Adopted by Institution Delivered Via Delivery System

  22. Services Model #2 For Profit Entity Creates Institution “Turnkey” Curriculum Adopted by Evauates Student Performance Delivered Via Awards Academic Credit or Credential Delivery System

  23. Michael B. Goldstein Dow, Lohnes & Albertson 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 mgoldstein@dlalaw.com 202.776.2569 Fax 202.776.4569 www.dlalaw.com

More Related