1 / 15

Discrimination

Discrimination. Theories of Discrimination Cost of Segregation Economic Models of Labor Market Discrimination. Theories of Discrimination. Marxist: Discrimination a Smoke Screen Capitalists want to divide working class Use media, church, state to inculcate "values"

ania
Download Presentation

Discrimination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Discrimination Theories of Discrimination Cost of Segregation Economic Models of Labor Market Discrimination

  2. Theories of Discrimination • Marxist: Discrimination a Smoke Screen • Capitalists want to divide working class • Use media, church, state to inculcate "values" • Can segregate by race, sex, ethnicity • Could be anything (earlobes, noses, skin color?) • Keep Irish & Italian workers in the 19thC ghetto • Segregation reduces workers opp'ty cost • Low opportunity cost creates low wage bills

  3. Theories of Discrimination (2) • Psychological theories • a) Mistaken beliefs (remedy is education) • b) Ancient roots stemming for warring tribes • Here come the Huns! the Vikings! the Saxons! • effectiveness enhanced by physical similarity • remedy more problematic if tastes are "hard-wired"

  4. Neoclassical Economic Theory • Take prejudicial tastes as given • They exist, so lets analyze the consequences • Simple form: preference for one's own type • More complicated forms: political/economic • S. Carolina in 1870: white property owners' wealth threatened by votes of majority black freemen • Economic Lesson: acting on basis of prejudice typically involves a cost

  5. Cost of Segregation: MLB • Baseball has legal cartel • League enforced all-white policy since 1890s (why?) • Bill Veeck foiled in 1944 • tried to buy Phillies & stock w/ black players • owners blocked, and sold Phillies for lower price • Jackie Robinson integrated baseball w/ Dodgers • Veeck soon hired Larry Doby & Satchel Paige • Teams that integrated first improved the most • Dodgers, Giants, Indians, & Braves • Cost of Prejudice in MLB of the 1950s • Market competition is a force opposing segregation

  6. Cost of Segregation: NCAA CFB • Consider 1964 Univ. Alabama football team • Very good – (nat'l champion) – and very white • Ala begins losing to integrated teams • 1970: Sam “Bam” Cunningham of Southern Cal scores 5 TD’s against them on national TV • 1971: Team accepts 1st black players • Wins Titles again in mid-late 1970s • Cost of segregation became too great • Sports became most integrated part of Ala

  7. Model of Employer Discrimination • Employers favor one group • may be paternalism • English have capital & favor own kids over Irish • Assume an extra psychological cost to employing Irish: dI • dI is a non-wage hiring cost • Cost of employing English is just monetary • DE is greater than DI w dI DE DI Q

  8. Market Equilibrium w/ Employer Discrimination • Let supply of labor of two groups be same • Assume employers can segregate Irish from English • Taste for discrimination favors English workers • they gain higher employment & wages than in non-discriminatory equilibrium • Irish suffer lower employment & lower wages w SE = SI wE* wI* DE DI SI* Q SE*

  9. A Profit Opportunity for Non-Discriminatory Employers • DE measures MRP • At QI*, MRPI exceeds wE* • MRPI - WI* is a profit opportunity for non-discriminatory employers • Entry & Competition increase wages & employment of Irish • Lower costs of non-discriminatory firms give them an edge in product market competition • Competitive markets eliminate discrimination w SE = SI MRPI wE* wI* DE DI QI* Q QE*

  10. Employee Discrimination • Assume workers prefer working with own type • perceive a cost (d) from working in mixed group • we = (1-d)w0 • we = effective wage • w0 = money wage • "real" or "effective" wage is reduced in mixed group • requires higher pay to attract workers to mixed group • Q: What would employers do? • it depends

  11. Employee Discrimination (2) • Segregation vs Discrimination • Voluntary segregation • all workers prefer to work w/ own type & are more productive doing so • Chinese & Mexican restaurants; workers self-segregate • Discrimination • dominant group inhibits employers from hiring minority group members that are equally or more productive • employer would hire minorities but is deterred by workers • again, segregated firms is result, but involuntary • Example: Dodgers & Jackie Robinson • Al Gionfriddo hired to take locker next to Robinson • Fights on the field w/ opponents

  12. Customer Discrimination • Fans want to trade / watch own type • White people are biggest, richest group in U.S. • Pay (modest) premium in card market for cards of white players • Owners believed same prejudice extends to composition of team • What if employer punished for tolerance? • Old Redskins: “Burgundy, Gold, and Caucasian” in D.C. • Allegedly catering to discriminatory (southern) audience • Note also that George Marshall (owner) was an inveterate racist • Tough problem for free markets: competition caters to discrimination in this case

  13. Sex Discrimination • Harder to measure in sport than elsewhere • Men & women seldom in same venue • Often don’t play same sport • Direct competition: Jockeys & auto racing • Women’s Basketball (Golf, Soccer) • A different sport: designed to protect women • competition ceases to be interesting if men allowed • Women not always victims • Female gymnasts and figure skaters benefit from taste for their performances relative to males

  14. Title IX • Part of 1972 Education Legislation • Mandates equal access & opportunity for women in fed-funded education programs • 3 ways to comply • Funding proportional to enrollments • Program shows history of expansion • Interests of students accommodated

  15. Impacts of Title IX • Compliance is quite limited; progress is slow • Good • Spurred growth in women’s sports • Gave grounds to seek remediation outside school • Bad • Trappings of “big-time”: NCAA vs AIAW • What happened to women coaches? • Was ~80% of women’s programs - now much lower • Can meet T9 requirements in many ways: • Cut men’s programs rather than expanding women’s

More Related