Local challenges of the economic crisis experience of decentralized local political elites
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 16

Local Challenges of the Economic Crisis: Experience of Decentralized Local Political Elites PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 98 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Roxana Marin, PhD student, Doctoral School of Political Science, University of Bucharest doctoral fellow, Romanian Academy, Ia și branch [email protected] Local Challenges of the Economic Crisis: Experience of Decentralized Local Political Elites.

Download Presentation

Local Challenges of the Economic Crisis: Experience of Decentralized Local Political Elites

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Local challenges of the economic crisis experience of decentralized local political elites

Roxana Marin,

PhD student, Doctoral School of Political Science, University of Bucharest

doctoral fellow, Romanian Academy, Iași branch

[email protected]

Local Challenges of the Economic Crisis: Experience of Decentralized Local Political Elites

SCOPE International Conference. The Interdisciplinary Vocation of Political Science(s), University of Bucharest, Faculty of Political Science, Bucharest, June 27-29, 2014


Contents

Contents

  • Theoretical assessments;

  • Case-studies: objective, research questions; research methods;

  • Results;

  • Tentative explanations;

  • Conclusions


Theoretical assessments

Theoretical Assessments

  • How to measure degree of decentralization ?

    • Level of proclivity towards decentralization (Dunn, Wetzel 2000);

    • Share of subnational governments to the public consumption/ GDP (IMF 2001);

    • Qualitative indicators: government credibility, social capital (de Mello 2000), soft/ hard budget constrains (Janos Kornai), levels of corruption, administrative capacity (Gargan 1981);

  • How to measure “the legacy of the past” (Jowitt, 1999) ?


Subnational share of general government expenditure

Subnational share of general government expenditure (%)

Significant level of decentralization: > 50%;

Standard level of decentralization: > 30%;

Low level of decentralization: < 30%


Case studies objective research questions research methods i

Case-studies: objective, research questions, research methods (I)

  • The present research is concerned with the issue of local leadership in the countries of East-Central Europe.

  • Concretely, the intended research started as an attempt to examine, in a comparative manner, the profile and the role of the local political elites in three transitional democracies of East-Central Europe, Romania, the Czech Republic, and Poland, and the elites’ impact on the evolution of the local communities in the developing region of former Sovietized Europe;

  • Focal case studies, three small towns, Tecuci , ČeskáLípa, and Oleśnica, Gyula, and Targovishte, quite similar in terms of demographics (roughly 40,000 inhabitants) and developmental strategies (an economy based on the alimentary industry and on commerce activities, etc.);

  • The scope of the research - initially, rather descriptive, exploratory; an inductive, observatory process – an inquiry into a range of aspects worth pointing out when dealing with and discussing on the study of political elites.


Methodological note

Methodological note

  • The positional method of identifying and analyzing the local political elites, by operationalizing the phrase “local political elites” through the following definition: The local political elite is that group comprising those individuals in legislative and executive positions within the local leading, decision-making structure;

  • The population of the empirical research: the members of the Local/ Municipal Councils in Tecuci (19 persons), Targovishte (33 persons), ČeskáLípa (25 persons), Oleśnica (22 persons), and Gyula (21 persons) as they were in 2011-2013;

  • Methods of gathering data:

Written questionnaire;

Document analysis;

Participative Observation, etc.

  • Methods of identifying and analyzing elites:

Positional (Wright-Mills 1956)

Reputational (Warner 1941-1963; Hunter 1953, 1956; Miller 1985;

Decisional (Dahl 1961; Lynds 1929,1937)


Results i

Results (I)


Local challenges of the economic crisis experience of decentralized local political elites

Results (II): Interactions with other groups/ institutions


Results iii which of the following aspects do you value the most in a democracy

Results (III): Which of the following aspects do you value the most in a democracy ?


Results iv attitudes towards decentralization

Results (IV): Attitudes towards decentralization


Results v attitudes towards state intervention in economy

Results (V): Attitudes towards state intervention in economy


Results vi models of local councilor

Results (VI): Models of local councilor

  • The ethical model (22.65%; 28.68%; 18.91%; 32.23%; 20.75%);

  • The political model (23.98%; 12.93%; 4.05%; 32.23%; 18.65%);

  • The technocratic model (9.33%; 21.28%; 18.90%; 10.52%; 22.05%);

  • The pragmatic model (21.32%; 37%; 45.9%; 25%; 38.55);

  • The gender model (0% for all cases).


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Inconclusive results for: elites’ perceptions on state intervention in economy; the level of elite satisfaction of living in the town

  • The lower the level of decentralization, the higher the level of acceptance for decentralization and greater autonomy

  • Generally, the higher the level of decentralization:

    • The higher the level of responsibility of the local elites, and their capacity to pinpoint key domains of interest at the local level;

    • The more isolated the political elite;

    • The more localized the political elite, in socio-geographical identification.

  • The impact of the “legacy of the past” is still to be considered and might supplement the explanations


Tentative typology

Tentative typology

  • “Predominantly elitistic” (e.g.Tecuci and Targovishte), corresponding to a former “modernizing-nationalizing”, “patrimonial” communist dictatorship, followed by “elite reproduction”, and low levels of administrative decentralization and local autonomy, presently; characterized by a significant degree of “elite distinctiveness”;

  • “Democratic elitist” (e.g.Oleśnica and Gyula), corresponding to a defunct “national-accommodative” communist dictatorship, followed by “elite circulation”, and high levels of decentralization and local autonomy, in the present;

  • “Predominantly democratic” (e.g.ČeskàLípa), corresponding to a former “bureaucratic-autoritarian”, “welfare” communist dictatorship, followed by “elite circulation”, a tradition of administrative decentralization, and significant levels of local autonomy, nowadays.


Selective references

Selective references

De Mello, Luiz (2000). Can Fiscal Decentralization Strengthen Social Capital?, Washington, DC: IMF Working Paper No. 129.

Eldersveld, Samuel, Political Elites in Modern Societies. Empirical Research and Democratic Theory, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1989;

Stoica, Virgil, Cine conduce Iasiul ?, Fundația Axis Publishing House, Iași, 2003.

Warner, William Lloyd, Yankee City, Yale University Press, New Haven (Connecticut), 1963;

  • Robert Staughton LYND and Helen Merrell LYND, Middletown: A Study in Contemporary American Culture, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1929; idem, Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1937.

  • William Lloyd Warner, Yankee City, Yale University Press, New Haven (Connecticut), 1963;

  • Floyd HUNTER, Community Organization: Action and Inaction, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (North Carolina),1952. idem, Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision-Makers, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (North Carolina), 1953.

  • Delbert C. MILLER, “Industry and Community Power Structure: A Comparative Study of an American and an English City”, in American Sociological Review, Vol. 23, No. 1 (February 1985), pp. 9-15.

  • Robert DAHL, Who Governs ? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale University Press, New Haven (Connecticut), 1961.

  • Samuel ELDERSVELD, Political Elites in Modern Societies. Empirical Research and Democratic Theory, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1989;

  • Virgil STOICA, Cine conduce Iasiul ?, Fundația Axis Publishing House, Iași, 2003


Thank you

THANK YOU !


  • Login