1 / 12

Old Reliable

Old Reliable. Testing accurately for thousands of years. Reliability. Validity def.? Validity is how closely a test measures what it says it will measure. Reliability def.? Reliability is the consistency of your measurement, . . .

alina
Download Presentation

Old Reliable

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Old Reliable Testing accurately for thousands of years

  2. Reliability • Validity def.? • Validity is how closely a test measures what it says it will measure. • Reliability def.? • Reliability is the consistency of your measurement, . . . • or the degree to which an instrument measures the same way each time it is used… • under the same conditions with the same subjects.

  3. Why aren’t you more reliable? • Imagine your students are taking a long multiple choice test, • What are some common threats to reliability? • Guessing • Ambiguous questions • Physical/emotional state of test takers • Environmental distractions • Mechanical problems, e.g. computer glitches, not filling in bubbles properly.

  4. Why aren’t you more reliable? • Imagine your students are taking an essay test, • What are some common threats to reliability? • Assessor or Inter-rater reliability • Object/Person-related reliability • Instrument-related reliability

  5. Do we measure reliability??? • No, we “estimate” it. • How can we estimate reliability? • Test-Retest • Split-half • What are the pros and cons of each?

  6. Measuring reliability??? • What do you get after you perform these tests? • A reliability coefficient, like .91 or .78 • What would be the range of reasonable reliability coefficients for a grammar test or vocabulary test? • .9 to .99 • How about for a speaking test? • .7 to .79

  7. Investigar • Go to the class wiki located at • http://span676-testingnassessment.wikispaces.com/ • Then click “Materials to be used in class” and follow the instructions under reliability of SAT.

  8. Standard Error and True Score • How high can you jump off of both feet with no steps? • Average of several attempts = closer to “True Score” • Can we really know what someone’s “True Score” truly is? • Impossible, but. . . • with lots of attempts, u get close.

  9. Top Several Ways to Enhance Reliability • Take enough samples • Exclude items don’t distinguish between students • Don’t give too much freedom • Write unambiguous items/questions • Provide clear instructions • Ensure legibility, clarity of design, white space etc. • Train Scorers • Proved detailed scoring key/rubric/instructions • Identify students/participants by number, not name • Multiple raters for subjective stuff. Which of these work for teachers in a college or pub school setting?

  10. Testing Tasks • You are giving the following writing assignmentto your students in Spanish 100007. • Write a paper in Spanish giving your thoughts on a current event. • With a partner, rewrite the instructions to improve reliability.

  11. Testing Tasks • Discuss with a partner… • You are testing students’ oral proficiency as a final exam in your Spanish 3 high school class. • What can you do to improve the reliability of scoring? • You want to know which multiple choice questions on your test distinguish between stronger and weaker students. • How might you analyze test results to determine this? • Think of the main steps and then explain to a partner.

More Related