1 / 5

Cost-effectiveness reported for each test as one program-wide number

ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee. Current ESA CE Reporting. Cost-effectiveness reported for each test as one program-wide number In annual reports, and applications (every 3 years)

ajay
Download Presentation

Cost-effectiveness reported for each test as one program-wide number

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee Current ESA CE Reporting Cost-effectiveness reported for each test as • one program-wide number • In annual reports, and applications (every 3 years) • 70-150 individual measure-level numbers (typically anywhere from 70 – 150 measures depending on whether they are disaggregated by housing type and CZ – For non-weather- sensitive measures, either approach has been used) • In applications

  2. ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee What Does Current ESA CE Reporting Tell Us? • Individual measure-level CE can be informally grouped together to get an idea of how cost-effective it is for ESA to serve a particular dwelling type or region. • Without knowing the number of measures installed for a certain time period, it is difficult to tell from the cost-effectiveness reporting how the individual measure-level CE contributes to program-level CE. • However, spending levels and numbers of installations are available in separate tables in annual reports.

  3. ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee Proposal for Additional CE Reporting Provide cost-effectiveness outcomes for parts of the program, defined primarily by • dwelling type • climate characteristics Additional parameters that may be useful to define groupings • Fuel impacted • Weather-sensitive, non-weather-sensitive measures • Type of fuel used for heating the dwelling

  4. ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee Possible Climate Areas

  5. ESAP Cost-effectiveness Household Typology Subcommittee PURPOSE OF ADDITIONAL REPORTING • Shine light on how CE from different parts of program contributes to overall program CE • Provide information to those interested in particular dwelling types or regions • More clearly display how inputs to CE affect overall results • Highlight areas that may require program design changes • Other ideas?

More Related