1 / 20

Soji Adelaja Hannah Distinguished Professor in Land Policy Land Policy Program

Comprehensive Land Use/Land Cover Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling: A Partnership Approach for Michigan. Soji Adelaja Hannah Distinguished Professor in Land Policy Land Policy Program Michigan State University. Current Context for Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling.

aimon
Download Presentation

Soji Adelaja Hannah Distinguished Professor in Land Policy Land Policy Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comprehensive Land Use/Land Cover Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling:A Partnership Approachfor Michigan Soji Adelaja Hannah DistinguishedProfessor in Land Policy Land Policy Program Michigan State University

  2. Current Context for Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling • Last statewide, planning-scale land use/land cover data inventory dates to 1978 (MIRIS). • Lack of current data impedes the ability to assess current patterns, predict trends, and effectively plan for future land use demands in: • Urban revitalization. • Conversion of agricultural lands to other uses. • Land-based industries. • Wetland and other habitat preservation. • Rural residential development. • Economic development.

  3. Michigan Land Use Leadership Council • Established by Governor Granholm in 2003: • Identify trends, causes and consequences of unmanaged growth and development. • Make recommendations for the improvement of land use policy. • Principal recommendations include: • Update of Land Use/Land Cover data. • Support research, development, and training at state universities to develop and deploy new technologies for monitoring and analyzing environmental conditions. • Monitor and report land use/land cover change, by county.

  4. Leadership and Capacity of MSU’s Land Policy Program Research Centers and Institutes • Remote Sensing and GIS Research and Outreach Services (RS&GIS) • Institute for Water Resources (IWR) • Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) • Victor Institute • Center for Research on Underground Infrastructure (CURIE) • Center for Global Change and Earth Observations (CGCEO)

  5. Leadership and Capacity of MSU’s Land Policy Program - Continued Departments • Geography • Agricultural Economics • CARRS • Urban Planning • Landscape Architecture • Construction Management

  6. Leadership and Capacity of MSU’s Land Policy Program - Continued MSU Extension – Delivery to Communities • Land Use AOE Team • Economic Development AOE Team

  7. State Agencies Department of Agriculture Department of Community Health Department of Environmental Quality Department of Information Technology Department of Natural Resources Department of Transportation State Police Department of History, Arts and Libraries Federal Agencies US Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Protection Agency US Forest Service US Fisheries and Wildlife US Geologic Survey Other Organizations Great Lakes Commission Ducks Unlimited Michigan Farmland and Community Trust MSU Partnership Opportunity We can design the next aerial imagery flyover to position Michigan for fundamental land use innovation through current information and data

  8. LPP and RS&GIS Foundation Activities • National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) Aerial Imagery Partnership Meeting: • USDA Farm Service Agency. • Establish Michigan’s role in the 2005 Aerial Photography flight. • Identify partners. • Plan for comprehensive initiative. • Land Use/Land Cover Modeling workshop: • Provide a forum for sharing current modeling efforts in Michigan. • Identify gaps in current modeling efforts. • Facilitate collaboration between the modeling communities. • Handbook for Land Use/Land Cover data update methodology: • Develop standards for imagery sources, classification schemes, and polygon digitization for land use/land cover data updating. • Define protocols with respect to 1978 MIRIS land use/land cover data.

  9. Initiative Goal: Development of an integrated set of decision support tools including comprehensive data, spatial analysis, and predictive models to help communities.

  10. Community Deliverables Predictive State Model Directed Research Land Use/Land Cover Data Update & Analysis Aerial Imagery Acquisition A Framework for Delivery Driven by community and policy needs Designed to position partners for optimal impact on stakeholders Designed to meet information needs of partners and state

  11. Aerial Imagery Acquisition • High resolution, statewide imagery: • National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP). • Digital imagery. • Ortho-rectified. • 1 meter resolution. • Color (CIR/Natural). • Non-exclusive rights.

  12. Land Use/ Land Cover Data • Planning-scale land use/land cover data update for the approximately 37 million acres of Michigan’s diverse landscape: • Michigan is the 3rd most agriculturally diverse state in the nation. • Michigan’s Upper and Lower Peninsulas are comprised of abundant deciduous and coniferous forests. • Michigan’s glacial history provides a unique topography that offers numerous water, wetland, and dune features. • Michigan’s core cities, suburban communities and rural residences support the growing population. • Overlay of municipal, government, socio-economic, demographic, fiscal, and other variables.

  13. Land Use/Land Cover Data – A Methodology for Updating • Correction of gross classification errors (1978 data). • Interpretation of current imagery to present land classification. • Fieldwork to ensure interpretation accuracy. • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Protocol to certify National Map Accuracy Standards. • Partner and vision driven protocols.

  14. Lake Institutional (Education) Single Family Residential Central Hardwoods Road Transportation Cropland Web Accessible Digital Imagery Central Hardwoods Municipal Consolidation Analysis Comprehensive Community Simulation Digital Data Species Preservation Resource Atlas Fiscal Impact Analysis Summary Statistics Online GIS Decision Support Impervious Surface Watershed Quality Assessment Predictive Model Imagery and Data - A Foundation for Deliverables

  15. Community Deliverables • County Resource Atlas, for each county, illustrating patterns of land use/land cover, natural resources, demographics, etc.: • Large format maps. • Summary statistics depicting change characteristics. • Fact Sheets. • Digital Data for use in county GIS programs: • Land Use/Land Cover polygon data. • Statewide digital imagery sets (NAIP). • Web accessible products: • Online GIS decision support and planning tools.

  16. Predictive Model for Michigan • Dynamic model based upon several sub-models that “talk to each other”: • Demographic trends. • Community characteristics. • Economic impacts. • Land demand and consumption forecast. • Infrastructure planning requirements. • Fiscal impacts. • Ecological impacts. • Consolidation implications.

  17. Directed Research • Fiscal Impact Analysis. • Impervious surfaces in watersheds -assessment of water quality impacts. • Unique and endangered species preservation. • Brownfield redevelopment. • Commerce Center impacts. • Cool Cities impacts. • Impacts of farmland preservation. • Growth corridors.

  18. Products and Timelines Directed Research State Model and Relational Database Community Deliverables Land Use/Land Cover Data Update & Development Aerial Imagery Acquisition Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

  19. Mission Empower Michigan decision-makers with critical land use information

  20. Next Steps • Need strong partnership • Need to refine activities and goals • Need to identify funding sources • Need advisory committee • Need to formalize partnership structure

More Related