1 / 33

Grant Applications Made Simple(r)

Grant Applications Made Simple(r). Rose Wiles, David Martin, Sue Heath National Centre for Research Methods University of Southampton. Overview. Sources of funding How to convert a research idea into a grant application with a good chance of success Who and what you need to know

afya
Download Presentation

Grant Applications Made Simple(r)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Grant Applications Made Simple(r) Rose Wiles, David Martin, Sue Heath National Centre for Research Methods University of Southampton

  2. Overview • Sources of funding • How to convert a research idea into a grant application with a good chance of success • Who and what you need to know • How costings work • How the application process works • Dos and don’ts of grant applications: useful tips • Small print: this guidance based on past experience offered in good faith and without guarantees!

  3. Who we are • Rose Wiles, Principal Research Fellow, NCRM: 8 NHS grants, 5 charity grants, 2 ESRC grants • David Martin, NCRM co-director, ESRC Census Programme coordinator: 16 ESRC awards, plus others • Sue Heath, NCRM co-director, Centre for Population Change co-director: 6 ESRC grants, plus 2 others

  4. Out of scope • What makes a good research idea • Why seek research funding • How to manage a grant once you’ve got it

  5. Funding opportunities • ESRC opportunities • Postdoctoral Fellowships • Research Grant Scheme • Research Fellowship Scheme • Other ‘early career’ opportunities • Nuffield foundation: small grants scheme; new career development fellowships • Leverhulme: early career fellowships

  6. ESRC post-doctoral fellowships • For those just about to complete a PhD or who have no more than 3 years active postdoc experience (career breaks for family or health reasons allowable) • Applications in 2008 specifically encouraged in priority discipline areas: economics; education; management and business studies; advanced quantitative methods; social work; socio-legal studies • Not confined to UK citizens • Apply any time • 1 year FT or 2 years PT funding on research salary scale plus limited expenses

  7. Post-doctoral fellowships: objectives • ‘Time to gear up for a successful academic career’ • To produce publications to help secure a track record in your chosen specialisation & to improve opportunities for long-term employment in the HEI sector; • To disseminate your research findings to both academic and non-academic audiences; • To improve research and related skills through specialised training • To carry out further limited research linked to your PhD and through developing proposals for further funding

  8. ESRC research grants scheme • Single projects from £15K to £1.5M • Up to five years funding • Small grants = <100K: good starting point for funding • Basic criteria: quality, timeliness, track record and value for money

  9. ESRC Research Fellowship Scheme • A period of concentrated research activity: ‘a significant career development opportunity for promising researchers’ • Open to applicants in all disciplines and at all stages of postdoctoral research career • Open to applicants in established posts and contract researchers • If <10 years experience, a mentor will be appointed, & career development must be a strong theme • Full salary plus research expenses • Can apply at any time

  10. Research Fellowship Scheme: Objectives • A programme of work, not a single project • Focus on career development - 2-3 years funding • To include training in, eg, advanced methods, teaching, research management • To consolidate previous research and theoretical/methodological development

  11. Nuffield Foundation: Social Science Small Grants Scheme • Up to £7.5K or exceptionally £12k • For those new to social science research; for outstanding small or pilot projects or for projects linked to ‘the advancement of social well-being’ • Can apply at any time

  12. Nuffield Foundation: New Career Development Fellowships • Aimed at post-doctoral researchers who have the potential to become outstanding in their field • Collaborative scheme: postdoctoral researchers and established researcher • Up to £170K over 3 years + money for partner researcher • Designed to facilitate ‘a change in direction’ for exceptional new scholars • Date for 2009 to be announced

  13. Leverhulme Trust: Early Career Fellowships • To provide career development opportunities for people at an early stage of career but with a proven research record • not in an established post • Normally under 35 (unless career break or late starter) • 2-3 years funding: 50% salary costs, 50% from institution, plus £5K expenses per annum • Next round: January 2009

  14. Turning a research idea into a grant proposal • (Assuming you already have a great idea…) • Be clear about what will make your application unique • Ensure promised outputs are in proportion to the inputs • Get all the details of the proposal spot-on • A research grant proposal has to combine a small business plan with an academic research paper

  15. Programme call Research idea Response mode

  16. Programme call Costing Research idea Develop project proposal Response mode

  17. Programme call Costing software (pfact) Costing J-eS Research idea Develop project proposal Response mode

  18. Focus of this presentation Programme call Costing software (pfact) Costing J-eS* Submission Research idea Develop project proposal Response mode *To research councils

  19. Developing a workplan • Workpackages, timescales, start and finish dates, sequencing of work • Who is going to do the work? • How much academic direction? • What can be done by RAs/tech/admin? • What are the interdependencies? • Beware risky elements beyond own control • Inter-institutional: will take (much) longer!

  20. Other considerations • Ethics approval – School/University processes? • Collaborators and letters of support? • Inclusion of studentships? (esp. timings) • NB ALWAYS follow any funder- and programme-specific rules! • Nominated reviewers? • Implications for own workload? If so, discuss very early with Head of School/dept.

  21. Costings: the FEC wonderland • FEC = “Full economic costing” • Used to be “overheads” • Main driver is academic/research staff time • Investigators’ own time must be costed • FEC based on financial analysis of costs to institution (estate costs, heat/light, etc.) • Research councils only currently pay 80% of FEC

  22. Costings: homework • Make a complete list of what you need • Staff, travel, equipment, services, etc. • Use own University rates – that is how you’ll claim • Collate staffing details: start and end dates, % time worked, salary points for new staff • NB technical/admin = no institutional drivers • Get exemplar costs for all travel, equipment etc. and be prepared to justify • No general “office expenses” etc.

  23. J-eS • Have to be registered first – and use annually! • Online grant application website for UK research councils • Most elements completed by applicants • Approved costings information to be uploaded • Need to organize and chase everyone involved: CVs of collaborators and named staff; approvers to be ready on the day, etc.

  24. Structure of a J-eS bid • Simple questions – PI, Co-Is, previous apps, etc. • Short text answers (summary, objectives, ethics) • NB character counts not the same as Word! • Attachments: typically Case for support, applicant CVs, Justification of resources, Bibliography, Letters of support etc. • All completed in shared online workspace • Submission and approval sequence leading to submission to research council

  25. Submisson of a J-eS bid • All documentation completed • Submitted by PI to School/dept. approvers • Submitted by School/dept. approver to University approver (usually finance dept.) • Submitted by university approver to research council • All electronic, but requires chain of people who are expecting it in advance and already know it’s OK

  26. How the application will be judged • Receipt acknowledged by research council registry • Checked by office against funding rules and specifics of call • Despatched to reviewers and assessors • Grades considered by commissioning panel, decisions made and ratified • Contract negotiated with university • The real work begins…

  27. Do… • Familiarise yourself with the funding body’s strategy and ethos • Familiarise yourself with the specific requirements of a funding body or a specific call • Make sure that you are eligible for the scheme for which you’re applying (and check with them if you’re unsure)

  28. Do… • Start the application process in good time • Make the case for your project directly and strongly – why should your project be prioritised (given that it will be in competition with others)? • Set out your research questions and objectives clearly (a research proposal is not a literature review; get right the balance of background and proposal)

  29. Do… • Set out your methodology clearly, and flag up where it is cutting edge and interdisciplinary • Ensure that methods address the research questions set out • Acknowledge awareness of potential problems and possible criticisms of approach chosen • Include a timetable for your activities

  30. Do… • Use the bibliography to show up-to-date knowledge of the field • Choose an appropriate and reliable nominated reviewer • Engage with potential research users • Address the issue of knowledge transfer • Draw on other people’s expertise (e.g. that of staff in the research office)

  31. Don’t… • Promise to solve all the problems in your field in one project • Assume that key points are too obvious to need stating explicitly (referees can comment only on what is before them) • Undersell yourself or your project (the total cost will look dauntingly big)

  32. Don’t… • Miss the opportunity to spell out how well your project fits the scheme/call • Give up at the first hurdle, or be put off by the odds of success of the average application • Be afraid to ask colleagues to see applications they have made (successful and unsuccessful, with comments)

  33. And finally… Even though the odds may be against being funded, DON’T give up!

More Related