1 / 39

200 Minuteman Drive

200 Minuteman Drive. New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment. Brent Ellmann Structural Option Dr. Linda Hanagan - Consultant . Project Players. Owner- Brickstone Properties Architects-Burt Hill Kosar Rittleman Associates

afi
Download Presentation

200 Minuteman Drive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 200 Minuteman Drive New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment Brent Ellmann Structural Option Dr. Linda Hanagan - Consultant

  2. Project Players • Owner- Brickstone Properties • Architects-Burt Hill Kosar Rittleman Associates • Structural Engineers- Atlantic Engineering Services • MEP Firm- H. F. Lenz Co. • C M Firm- Gilbane Building Company • Geotechnical Firm- Miller Engineering and Testing, Inc.

  3. Existing Building Conditions • Location: Andover, MA • 3 stories with 200,000 square feet of office space • Cost: $15 million • Designed and built with PictureTel Inc. as primary tenant

  4. Existing Structure • Composite Floor System • 4 inch slab + 2 inch deck • W18x35 beams and W24x76 girders • K Joist Roof System • Square footings and strip footings • Braced frames

  5. Existing Structure • Composite Floor System • K Joist Roof System • 22K6 joists supported by W24x55 girders • W18x35 beams used to support rooftop AHUs • Square footings and strip footings • Braced frames

  6. Existing Structure • Composite Floor System • K Joist Roof System • Square footings and strip footings • Square footings range in size from 5’-0” x 5’-0” to 10’-0” x 10’-0” • Strip footings vary in size from 1’-2” to 2’-8” wide • Braced frames

  7. Existing Structure • Composite Floor System • K Joist Roof System • Square footings and strip footings • Braced frames • Steel Tube and W shapes used as cross braces • Maximum brace width limited to 10” to maintain wall thicknesses

  8. Existing Mech./Elec./Arch. • Mechanical • 6 air handling units with DX cooling coils (25,000 CFM) and ducted supply with a plenum return VAV system • 2 cast iron- sectioned boilers (Gross Output – 2103 MBH) • Electrical • Main switchboard is a 480 Volt/2500 Amp switchboard • Typical light is a three tube FO32/T-8 fluorescent fixture • Architectural • Insulated metal panels, with low-E reflective glazing, on the southern façade • Northern facing curved facade is a limestone veneer, with low-E reflective glazing

  9. Presentation Outline • New Building Height and Floor Sizes by Code • Mechanical (Breadth) • Increased Air Handling Capacity • Duct Sizing • Boiler Design • Electrical (Breadth) • Increased switchboard capabilities • Structural (Emphasis) • Floor Vibration Study • Braced Frame Design • Foundation Design

  10. Goals of New Design • Maintain owner’s original wishes while adding additional floors • All steel building • Open office plan to allow for future tenant changes • Improve performance of floor under vibration excitement due to walking for sensitive equipment • Allow for varying use of building by multiple tenants at once

  11. Code Limits(Per 780 CMR: The Massachusetts State Building Code) • Classified as a 2B Protected Building • Maximum Height • 85’ (with sprinklers) • Maximum Number of Stories • 6 Stories (with sprinklers) • Maximum Allowable Floor Area • 74,250 square feet per floor

  12. New Design • 14’-7” floor to floor heights • 10’-0” clerestory maintained • New building height is 82’-11” • Floor Areas: • First Floor: 67,765 sq. ft. • 2nd-5th Floors: 65,800 sq. ft. • Total Floor Area: 331,000 sq. ft.

  13. Presentation Outline • New Building Height and Floor Sizes by Code • Mechanical (Breadth) • Increased Air Handling Capacity • Duct Sizing • Boiler Design • Electrical (Breadth) • Increased switchboard capabilities • Structural (Emphasis) • Floor Vibration Study • Braced Frame Design • Foundation Design

  14. Mechanical Design • Each half of a floor has own dedicated AHU to maintain multi-tenant capabilities • 10 AHUs located on roof -25,000 cfm each • All vertical runs from AHUs to floor are 84x32 rectangular ducts • Two Zones • Exterior Zone – air supplied through linear diffusers attached to fan boxes (200 cfm) with reheat capability • Interior Zone – air supplied by VAV boxes (160 cfm) • New Cast Iron Boilers • 3500 A-G-14 Series - net output of 3187 MBH (required output = 3050 MBH)

  15. AHU Locations

  16. Presentation Outline • New Building Height and Floor Sizes by Code • Mechanical (Breadth) • Increased Air Handling Capacity • Duct Sizing • Boiler Design • Electrical (Breadth) • Increased switchboard capabilities • Structural (Emphasis) • Floor Vibration Study • Braced Frame Design • Foundation Design

  17. Electrical Design

  18. New Switchboard • 3,500 Amp Busing • 65,000 Amp Short Circuit Rating

  19. Presentation Outline • New Building Height and Floor Sizes by Code • Mechanical (Breadth) • Increased Air Handling Capacity • Duct Sizing • Boiler Design • Electrical (Breadth) • Increased switchboard capabilities • Structural (Emphasis) • Floor Vibration Study • Braced Frame Design • Foundation Design

  20. Floor Vibration Criteria • Goal: Allow for a variety of technology and research based companies to use this facility • Design carried out using Design Guide 11 and the development of a spreadsheet • Sensitive equipment limit set at that of laboratory robots • Maximum Vibration Velocity – 4,000 μin/sec

  21. Compared Systems Original System New System

  22. Comparison

  23. Braced Frame Design-Loads • Wind • Basic Wind Velocity = 90 mph • Exposure Category B • Frequency = 2.00 Hz • Pressure = 18 psf • Seismic • SS = 0.30 g and S1 = 0.09 g • T = 0.50 seconds • Seismic Design Category B • W = 35,390 kips; CS = 0.058; V = 2,053 kips

  24. Critical Loading Wind Loads Seismic Loads C R I T I C A L • Low building height results in small wind pressures • Building’s location in an area of higher seismicity results in larger than normal seismic forces

  25. Frame Locations Critical Design Frames

  26. Frame H-34 (N-S) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: • Beams:

  27. Frame H-34 (N-S) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: W10x33 W10x49 • Beams:

  28. Frame H-34 (N-S) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: W10x33 W10x49 • Beams: W24x55 W27x84

  29. Frame 3-HJ (E-W) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: • Beams:

  30. Frame 3-HJ (E-W) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: TS10x10x1/2 • Beams:

  31. Frame 3-HJ (E-W) • Columns: W12x72 W12X152 • Braces: TS10x10x1/2 • Beams: W24x94 W24x162

  32. Foundation Design • Square footings used under columns and strip footings used around perimeter of building • Engineered soil placed under footings • Compressive Strength = 6,000 psf • 3,000 psi concrete used for all footings

  33. Critical Frame Footings • Worst Case Load: • Axial Load = 1,620 Kips • Moment = 220 foot-kips • Double Layer of reinforcing steel needed to fit spacing requirements • Pier size increased to 3’-0” to handling bearing requirements

  34. Uplift Force • Problem: • Earthquake forces develop large uplift on footings • Solution: • Grade Beam attaching to adjacent footings

  35. Grade Beam • 3’-0” x 5’-0” beam spanning over four square footings • Double layer of steel used in both faces • Bottom of beam lines up with bottom of footings

  36. Conclusions • Two floors can be added onto the original design • New Building Height = 82’-11” • Usable Office Space = 330,000 sq. ft. • Mechanical Systems: • Four more AHUs placed on roof (10 total) • Boilers capacity increased by 1000 MBH each • Electrical Systems: • Dual Main-tie-main switchboard increased to a 3,500 amp busing switchboard

  37. Conclusions • Floor System: • Change to a non-composite system to reduce floor vibrations to a level acceptable for a wider variety of sensitive equipment • Braced Frames: • Building’s taller height and large lateral forces required stiffer frames • Foundations: • Grade beam added to handle large uplift forces developed on the square footings under the braced frames

  38. Thank You William McGhee - H.F. Lenz Andrew Verrengia - Atlantic Engineering Services Dr. Linda Hanagan- Structural Consultant Katie Trail – Electrical and Lighting Emphasis Sam Snyder – Mechanical Emphasis Friends and Family

  39. Questions???

More Related