1 / 7

AP Economics

AP Economics. Mr. Bernstein Module 62: Monopoly and Public Policy December 4, 2013. AP Economics Mr. Bernstein. Monopolies vs. Perfect Competition Q m < Q c P m > P c Monopoly p is > 0 Generally bad for consumers and good for the firm Is it bad for efficiency?.

adele
Download Presentation

AP Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Module 62: Monopoly and Public Policy December 4, 2013

  2. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Monopolies vs. Perfect Competition • Qm < Qc • Pm > Pc • Monopoly p is > 0 • Generally bad for consumers and good for the firm • Is it bad for efficiency?

  3. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Welfare Effects of a Monopoly

  4. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Welfare Effects of a Monopoly • In Perfect Competition • There is no Producer Surplus • Total Surplus in the triangle above P=MC=ATC and below D • In Monopoly • The steeper MR curve means Qm is lower than Qc • Total Surplus is the area above MC=ATC and below MR and is less than in Perfect Competition • PS is now positive; this a transfer from consumer to firm • CS shrinks; part of area formerly CS now belongs to nobody • Deadweight loss is the area under D and between Qc and Qm…represents beneficial transactions that do not occur

  5. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Preventing Monopoly Power • Antitrust Laws • Prevent formation of Monopoly via Mergers/Acquisitions or from ownership of critical resource input • Natural Monopolies exist from Economies of Scale • The ATC from one firm is lower than ATC from many competing firms • Example: Utilities • More efficient to allow and regulate • Government could purchase and operate where PC=MC but governments are not good at minimizing MC (!)

  6. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Price Regulation

  7. AP EconomicsMr. Bernstein Price Regulation Alternatives • Regulate to Perfect Competition Outcome • Output = QC, Price = PC, there is no DWL and CS is maximized • But loss is sustained - Utility would eventually go bankrupt • Regulate so firm earns economic profit • Output is OR, where PR = ATC • Some Deadweight Loss occurs, but less than with unregulated Monopoly • CS is larger than with unregulated Monopoly • Regulate to compromise between Perfect Outcome (best for consumer, bankrupts firm) and No Regulation (worst for consumer, incurs deadweight loss)

More Related