1 / 22

I-10 MASTER PLAN MIDDLE SECTION

I-10 MASTER PLAN MIDDLE SECTION. AGENDA. Study Area Limits Master Plan Process/Project Schedule Quick Review of Current and Future Conditions Tier I Evaluation Results Tier II Alternatives Analysis/Results Opportunities for Public Involvement Next Steps Project Contacts.

ada
Download Presentation

I-10 MASTER PLAN MIDDLE SECTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. I-10 MASTER PLANMIDDLE SECTION

  2. AGENDA • Study Area Limits • Master Plan Process/Project Schedule • Quick Review of Current and Future Conditions • Tier I Evaluation Results • Tier II Alternatives Analysis/Results • Opportunities for Public Involvement • NextSteps • Project Contacts

  3. STUDY AREA LIMITS End Project Jackson/Gadsden County Line Begin Project Santa Rosa/Okaloosa County Line

  4. MASTER PLAN EVALUATION PROCESS • Based on goals and objectives from the 2060 FTP • Criteria and measures of effectiveness were developed using previous studies, partner and public involvement, and the project team

  5. PROGRESSION FOR INTERSTATE ENHANCEMENTS Estimated Duration We are here

  6. PROJECT SCHEDULE We are here

  7. CURRENT CONDITIONS • Roadway design meet standards  • Existing travel demand (2012)  • All mainline segments, merge/diverge segments, and unsignalized intersections meet LOS standards  • Exit 56, SR 85 signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards  • Safety review  • Community and Environment review 

  8. FUTURE TRAVEL DEMAND - 2025 • Mainline and merge/diverge segments meet LOS standards  • Four unsignalized intersections do not meet LOS standards  • Exit 70, SR 285 • Exit 85, US 331 (DeFuniak Springs) • Exit 136, SR 276 (Family Dollar Distribution Center) • Exit 142, SR 71 (Marianna) • Exit 56, SR 85 (Crestview) signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards 

  9. FUTURE TRAVEL DEMAND - 2040 • Mainline and merge/diverge segments meet LOS standards • Nine unsignalized intersections do not meet LOS standards  • Exit 45, CR 189 • Exit 70, SR 285 • Exit 85, US 331 (DeFuniak Springs) • Exit 96, SR 81 • Exit 112, SR 79 (Bonifay) • Exit 56, SR 85 (Crestview) signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards • Exit 120, SR 77 (Chipley) • Exit 130, US 231 • Exit 136, SR 276 (Family Dollar Distribution Center) • Exit 142, SR 71 (Marianna)

  10. CONCEPTUAL MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT ALTERNATIVES • Tier I Evaluation Results • Tier II Alternatives Analysis • Tier II Evaluation Results

  11. TIER I EVALUATION RESULTS [1] Assumes new lanes [2] Assumes use of median [3] Assumes tolls [4] Assumes no trucks

  12. TIER I EVALUATION RESULTS • No build • Minor improvements (including interchange improvements) • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) expansion • Separated HOV lanes • Managed lanes • New general use lanes • New interchange • Multimodal strategies

  13. TIER II EVALUATION MATRIX

  14. TIER II EVALUATION RESULTS [1] Assumes new lanes [2] Assumes use of median [3] Assumes tolls [4] Assumes no trucks

  15. TIER II EVALUATION RESULTS • No build • Minor improvements (including interchange improvements) • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) expansion • New interchange • Multimodal strategies

  16. MINOR IMPROVEMENTS – RECOMMENDED INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS BY 2025 Exit 56, SR 85 Exit 136, SR 276 Exit 142, SR 71

  17. MINOR IMPROVEMENTS – RECOMMENDED INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS BY 2040 Exit 158, CR 286 Exit 45, CR 189 Exit 70, SR 285 Exit 56, SR 85 Exit 85, US 331 Exit 96, SR 81

  18. CONCEPTUAL LOCATION OF NEW INTERCHANGE I-10 @ ANTIOCH ROAD

  19. OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT • Tier II Alternatives public meeting • Okaloosa, Walton Counties • Thursday, July 31, 2014, 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. CST Crestview Community Center 1446 Commerce Drive, Crestview • Washington, Holmes, and Jackson Counties • Thursday, August 7, 2014, 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. CST First Baptist Church, 1300 South Blvd, Chipley • Project handouts/Comment sheet

  20. NEXT STEPS • Tier II Public Meetings • Preferred Mobility Enhancement Alternatives (PMEAs) sent to FDOT • Draft Master Plan report submitted to FDOT • Final Master Plan report distributed to counties for consideration into LRTP and Work Program priorities

  21. PROJECT CONTACTS Virgie Bowen – FDOT Project Manager Florida Department of Transportation District 3 Planning Office 1074 Hwy 90, Chipley, FL 32428 850-330-1530 email: virgie.bowen@dot.state.fl.us Ian Satter – District Public Information Director Florida Department of Transportation 1074 Hwy 90, Chipley, FL 32428 850-330-1205 email: ian.satter@dot.state.fl.us Sarah Walker – Consultant Project Manager HNTB 850-878-9777 email: sawalker@hntb.com

More Related