1 / 19

Rail Corridors on the axis West - East in Poland

Rail Corridors on the axis West - East in Poland. Dr. Marek Pawlik , PKP PLK S.A. Vice President. THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL RAIL BUSINESS FORUM “1520 STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP” Sochi, 31 May 2012. Corridor F. EU ERTMS corridor PL-DE. ERTMS corridors in Europe.

abra-mcpherson
Download Presentation

Rail Corridors on the axis West - East in Poland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rail Corridors on the axis West - East in Poland Dr.MarekPawlik, PKP PLK S.A. Vice President THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL RAIL BUSINESS FORUM “1520 STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP” Sochi, 31 May 2012

  2. Corridor F EU ERTMS corridor PL-DE

  3. ERTMS corridors in Europe 2005 – MoU: European Commission + European rail associations + UNIFE ERTMS implementation based on National Deployment Plans (2007), then unified into European Deployment Plan (2009). Aim: linking up major industrial areas, seaports with third countries.

  4. ERTMS corridor F • Letter of Intent signed between PL & DE Ministers in November 2007 • the shortest and the most convenient connection between Eastern and Western Europe • Warszawa - Duisburg ~1143 km, freigth train run ~35h • Warszawa - Duisburg by road ~1100 km, truck drive ~30h • Terespol (Legnica) – Aachen ~2000km, mostlydouble-trackedline, mostlyelectrified (exceptfromshortsectionsinSaxony) • additional 300 km in BE and NL whenextended (connection to seaportsinAntwerpen and Zeebrugge)

  5. Corridor F deploymentin Poland • intensive modernization of Warszawa – Poznań section • upgrading of infrastructure on E20 and E30 • upgrading of bridges upon Oder and Neisse • upgrading of Poznań nod • implementation on pilot section (Southern) • Legnica – BielawaDolna (BCP) divided into: • Modernisation of E30 rail line, stage II. Pilot • implementation of ETCS to be completedin 2013 • Modernisation of E30 rail line, stage II. Pilotimplementation of GSM-R to be completed in 2013 • Implementation of ERTMS (ETCS and GSM-R) on E20 railline: • EU financingguaranteed, tender documentsunderpreparation,to be completed in 2015

  6. Railway investmentson Corridor F in PL EU funds state budgetown sources

  7. Line E20/C-E 20 The east-west diameter of the Poland railway net

  8. „Poznan Node” total value: 104mln euro implementation: 2003-2009 financed by: ISPA, state budget „Warszawa-Poznań Remaining Works” section Sochaczew – Swarzędz pre-works POIiŚ 7.1- 8 118,8 mln PLN implementation:2011-2015 „Rzepin-State Border” total value: 24.2mln euro implementation: 2002 -2007 financed by:ISPA, state budget „Warszawa-Kunowice” totalvalue: 487mln euro executed: 1993-2000 financed by: EBI, EBOiR,PHARE statebudget, ownsource

  9. „Warszawa - Mińsk Mazowiecki” totalvalue: 80 mln euro executed: 1997-2000 financed by: EBI, PHARE, statebudget, ownsource „Siedlce -Terespol”Phase II POIiŚ 7.1- 9.1 770mln PLN implementation2009-2015 financed by: POIiŚ, statebudget „Siedlce -Terespol” Phase I totalvalue:265 mln euro implementation: 2005-2010 financed by:ISPA, statebudget, ownsource „Mińsk Mazowiecki - Siedlce” totalvalue: 132.5mln euro implementation: 2001-2008 financed by: ISPA, statebudget, ownsource

  10. Corridor F  Corridor 8 EU Regulation 913

  11. Regulation 913/2010 • This Regulation lays down rules for: • the establishment and organization of international rail corridors for competitive rail freight with a view to the development of a European rail network for competitive freight; • sets out rules for the selection, organisation, management and the indicative investment planning of freight corridors. • ‘freight corridor’ means all designated railway lines, including railway ferry lines, on the territory of or between Member States, and, where appropriate, European third countries, linking two or more terminals, along a principal route and, where appropriate, diversionary routes and sections connecting them, including the railway infrastructure and its equipment and relevant rail services in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 2001/14/EC

  12. RailFreightCorridor 8 Defined in the Regulation: Bremerhaven/Rotterdam/Antwerp-Aachen/Berlin-Warsaw- Terespol (Poland-Belarus border)/Kaunas Date of implementation: 10th November 2015

  13. RFC 8 in Poland

  14. Borderpointsagreed by IMs • LT-PL: Mockava-Trakiszki • PL-DE: Kunowice-Frankfurt/Oder • Gubin-Guben • Węgliniec-Horka(to includeallbranches of ERTMS corridor F) • DE-BE: Aachen-Montzen • Iron Rhine (to be approved by NL and DE governments) • DE-NL: Oldenzaal-BadBentheim

  15. InfrastructureManagerscooperation • PKP PLK S.A. coordinatescooperation of IMs as a leader. • First meetingregardingRFC 8 took place on 8-9th March 2011 in Warsaw. • Infrastructuremanagersmeetregularysincethen. • Management Board established. • Application for financing transport market studyprovided.

  16. Indicativetimeline - milestoneplanning Creation of implementation plan, incl. investment plan, description, performance obj., art.12-19, art.16&17 + consultationwithapplicants Creation of TOR Deadline10.11.2015 Establishment of the Management Board Finaldemarcation of corridor 10.05.15 implementation plan Beginning of the tender for transport market study Pre-arrangedtrainpaths to be published Creation of OSS Start of settingup of the Management Board transport marketstudy AdvisoryGroups Tender 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  17. Rail Freight Corridor 8 Bremerhaven/Rotterdam /Antwerp – Aachen/Berlin – Warsaw – Terespol (Poland- Belarus border)/Kaunas Establishment by 10 November 2015

  18. Thank you very much for your attention

More Related