Lecture 6 international portfolio diversification practical issues l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

LECTURE 6 : INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION / PRACTICAL ISSUES PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 125 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

LECTURE 6 : INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION / PRACTICAL ISSUES. (Asset Pricing and Portfolio Theory). Contents. International Investment Is there a case ? Importance of exchange rate Hedging exchange rate risk ? Practical issues Portfolio weights and the standard error

Download Presentation

LECTURE 6 : INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION / PRACTICAL ISSUES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Lecture 6 international portfolio diversification practical issues l.jpg

LECTURE 6 :INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION / PRACTICAL ISSUES

(Asset Pricing and Portfolio Theory)


Contents l.jpg

Contents

  • International Investment

    • Is there a case ?

    • Importance of exchange rate

    • Hedging exchange rate risk ?

  • Practical issues

  • Portfolio weights and the standard error

  • Rebalancing


Introduction l.jpg

Introduction

  • The market portfolio

  • International investments :

    • Can you enhance your risk return profile ?

    • Some facts

      • US investors seem to overweight US stocks

      • Other investors prefer their home country

         Home country bias

  • International diversification is easy (and ‘cheap’)

    • Improvements in technology (the internet)

    • ‘Customer friendly’ products : Mutual funds, investment trusts, index funds


Relative size of world stock markets 31 st dec 2003 l.jpg

Relative Size of World Stock Markets (31st Dec. 2003)

US Stock

Market

53%

10%


International investments l.jpg

International Investments


Benefits of international diversification l.jpg

Benefits of International Diversification

Risk (%)

Non Diversifiable Risk

domestic

international

Number of Stocks


Benefits and costs of international investments l.jpg

Benefits and Costs of International Investments

  • Benefits :

    • Interdependence of domestic and international stock markets

    • Interdependence between the foreign stock returns and exchange rate

  • Costs :

    • Equity risk : could be more (or less than domestic market)

    • Exchange rate risk

    • Political risk

    • Information risk


The exchange rate l.jpg

The Exchange Rate


International investment l.jpg

International Investment

Investment horizon : 1 year

rUS / ERUSD

Domestic Investment

(e.g. equity, bonds, etc.)

$

$

rEuro / EREuro

Euro

Euro

International Investment

(e.g. equity, bonds, etc.)

$

$


Example currency risk l.jpg

Example : Currency Risk

  • A US investor wants to invest in a British firm currently selling for £40. With $10,000 to invest and an exchange rate of $2 = £1

  • Question :

    • How many shares can the investor buy ? – A : 125

    • What is the return under different scenarios ?

      (uncertainty : what happens over the next year ?)

      • Different returns on investment (share price falls to £ 35, stays at £40 or increases to £45)

      • Exchange rate (dollar) stays at 2($/£), appreciate to 1.80($/£), depreciate to 2.20 ($/£).


Example currency risk cont l.jpg

Example : Currency Risk (Cont.)


How risky is the exchange rate l.jpg

How Risky is the Exchange Rate ?

  • Exchange rate provides additional dimension for diversification if exchange rate and foreign returns are not perfectly correlated

  • Expected return in domestic currency (say £) on foreign investment (say US)

    • Expected appreciation of foreign currency ($/£)

    • Expected return on foreign investment in foreign currency (here US Dollar)

      Return : E(Rdom) = E(SApp) + E(Rfor)

      Risk : Var(Rdom) = var(SApp) + Var(Rfor) + 2Cov(SApp, Rfor)


Variance of usd returns l.jpg

Variance of USD Returns

Eun and Resnik (1988)


Practical considerations l.jpg

Practical Considerations


Portfolio theory practical issues general l.jpg

Portfolio Theory : Practical Issues (General)

  • All investors do not have the same views about expected returns and covariances. However, we can still use this methodology to work out optimal proportions / weights for each individual investor.

  • The optimal weights will change as forecasts of returns and correlations change

  • Lots of weights might be negative which implies short selling, possibly on a large scale (if this is impractical you can calculate weights where all the weights are forced to be positive).

  • The method can be easily adopted to include transaction costs of buying and selling and investing ‘new’ flows of money.


Portfolio theory practical issues general18 l.jpg

Portfolio Theory : Practical Issues (General)

  • To overcome the sensitivity problem :

    … choose the weights to minimise portfolio variance (weights are independent of ‘badly measured’ expected returns).

    … choose ‘new weights’ which do not deviate from existing weights by more than x% (say 2%)

    … choose ‘new weights’ which do not deviate from ‘index tracking weights’ by more than x% (say 2%)

    … do not allow any short sales of risky assets (only positive weights).

    … limit the analysis to only a number (say 10) countries.


No short sales allowed i e w i 0 l.jpg

No Short Sales Allowed (i.e. wi > 0)

E(Rp)

Unconstraint efficient frontier

(short selling allowed)

  • Constraint efficient frontier

  • (with no short selling allowed)

  • always lies within unconstraint

  • efficient frontier or on it

  • - deviates more at high levels of ER and s

p


Jorion p 1992 portfolio optimisation in practice faj l.jpg

Jorion, P. (1992) ‘Portfolio Optimisation in Practice’, FAJ


Jorion 1992 the paper l.jpg

Jorion (1992) - The Paper

Bond markets (US investor’s point of view)

  • Sample period : Jan. 1978-Dec. 1988

  • Countries :

    USA, Canada, Germany, Japan, UK, Holland, France

  • Methodology applied :

    MCS, optimum portfolio risk and return calculations

  • Results :

    • Huge variation in risk and return

    • Zero weights :

      US 12% of MCS

      Japan 9% of MCS

      other countries at least 50% of the MCS


Monte carlo simulation and portfolio theory l.jpg

Monte Carlo Simulation and Portfolio Theory

  • Suppose k assets (say k = 3)

    (1.) Calculate the expected returns, variances and covariances for all k assets (here 3), using n-observations of ‘real data’.

    (2.) Assume a model which forecasts stock returns :

    Rt = m + et

    (3.) Generate (nxk) multivariate normally distributed random numbers with the characteristics of the ‘real data’ (e.g. mean = 0, and variance covariances).

    (4.) Generate for each asset n-‘simulated returns’ using the model above.


Monte carlo simulation and portfolio theory cont l.jpg

Monte Carlo Simulation and Portfolio Theory (Cont.)

(5.) Calculate the portfolio SD and return of the optimum portfolio using the ‘simulated returns data’.

(6.) Repeat steps (3.), (4.) and (5.) 1,000 times

(7.) Plot an xy scatter diagram of all 1,000 pairs of SD and returns.


Jorion 1992 monte carlo results l.jpg

Jorion (1992) - Monte Carlo Results

True Optimal Portfolio

UK

Annual Returns(%)

Germany

US

Volatility (%)


Britton jones 1999 journal of finance l.jpg

Britton-Jones (1999) – Journal of Finance


Britton jones 1999 the paper l.jpg

Britton-Jones (1999) – The Paper

  • International diversification : Are the optimal portfolio weights statistically significantly different from ZERO ?

  • Returns are measured in US Dollars and fully hedged

  • 11 countries : US, UK, Japan, Germany, …

  • Data : monthly data 1977 – 1996 (two subperiods : 1977–1986, 1986–1996)

  • Methodology used :

    • Regression analysis

    • Non-negative restrictions on weights not used


Britten jones 1999 optimum weights l.jpg

Britten-Jones (1999) : Optimum Weights


Summary l.jpg

Summary

  • A case for International diversification ?

    • Empirical (academic) evidence : Yes

    • Need to consider the exchange rate

  • Portfolio weights

    • Very sensitive to parameter inputs

    • Seem to have large standard errors

  • Suggestions to make portfolio theory workable in practice.


References l.jpg

References

  • Cuthbertson, K. and Nitzsche, D. (2001) ‘Investments : Spot and Derivatives Markets’, Chapter 18


References30 l.jpg

References

  • Jorion, P. (1992) ‘Portfolio Optimization in Practice’, Financial Analysts Journal, Jan-Feb, p. 68-74

  • Britton-Jones, M. (1999) ‘The Sampling Error in Estimates of Mean-Variance Efficient Portfolio Weights’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 637-659

  • Eun, C.S. and Resnik, B.G. (1988) ‘Exchange Rate Uncertainty, Forward Contracts and International Portfolio Selection’, Journal of Finance, Vol XLII, No. 1, pp. 197-215.


End of lecture l.jpg

END OF LECTURE


  • Login