Niagara family eco park
Download
1 / 57

NIAGARA FAMILY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 385 Views
  • Updated On :

NIAGARA FAMILY ECO-PARK. May 3, 2001. April 18, 2001. PREPARED BY: RYAN A. MCPHERSON PETER M. O’HARA BRIAN KULPA. Overview. Niagara Family Eco-Park Vision Current and Past Conditions The Niagara Family Eco-Park Alternative Future Benefits and Consequences of the Eco-Park

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'NIAGARA FAMILY ' - RoyLauris


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Niagara family eco park l.jpg

NIAGARA FAMILY ECO-PARK

May 3, 2001

April 18, 2001

PREPARED BY:

RYAN A. MCPHERSON

PETER M. O’HARA

BRIAN KULPA


Overview l.jpg
Overview

  • Niagara Family Eco-Park Vision

  • Current and Past Conditions

  • The Niagara Family Eco-Park Alternative Future

  • Benefits and Consequences of the Eco-Park

  • Implementation Strategy

  • Consequences of Other Scenarios


Vision l.jpg
Vision

We propose to develop a new comprehensive Eco-Park strategy that allows families to discover the important relationship that exists between nature, the environment, and themselves.


Why the eco park is good for families l.jpg
Why the Eco-Park is Good for Families

  • Comprehensive learning environment for families of all ages

  • Recreational opportunities for everyone

  • Gorge Greenway unifies the many venues throughout Niagara Falls

  • Demonstrates awareness of our environment through family friendly interactive venues


Past and current conditions in niagara falls new york l.jpg
Past and Current Conditions In Niagara Falls, New York

  • Ecology and the Environment

  • Economy

  • Stakeholders

  • Niagara Falls: 50 Years Later

  • Conclusion


Ecology and the environment l.jpg
Ecology and the Environment

  • Chemical Row

    • Many manufacturing industries in and around Niagara Falls

    • Current hazardous waste remediation (Superfund) ongoing

    • Love Canal: positive and negative results

  • Niagara Reservation State Park

    • Oldest park in New York State

    • Robert Moses Parkway: obstacle between city and Park

      • Summer 2001: two year impact study


Economy l.jpg
Economy

  • Why is Niagara Falls Attractive To Companies?

    • Access to hydropower and freshwater resources

      • high cost of conducting business

  • Manufacturing industries

    • Largest users of Niagara hydropower

    • Historically dominated Niagara Falls region

  • Service industries

    • Largest economic sector in Niagara region today

    • Information technology emphasis in region

  • Tourism industry

    • 1995 study: $549 million


Niagara falls stakeholders l.jpg

Governmental Players

Governor Pataki, Niagara Falls City Counsel and Mayor Elia, US Senators Schumer and Clinton, Representative LaFalce, State Senator Maziarz, Assemblywoman Delmonte and many others

Major Stakeholders

- New York Power Authority

- Residents of Niagara Falls and the region

- Niagara County; Erie County

- Niagara University and SUNY at Buffalo

- Tuscarora Nation

- Niagara County Stakeholders Committee; Niagara Power Coalition; Relicensing Consensus Committee

- Other environmental and recreational organizations

Niagara Falls Stakeholders


Niagara falls 50 years later l.jpg
Niagara Falls: 50 Years Later

  • 2000 Census

    • Niagara Falls: down 10.1%

  • Taxes

    • 46% of Niagara Falls’ property is non-taxable

    • Lewiston also severely impacted by non-taxable land

      • Less funding for educational, government and social services

  • A Tale of Two Niagara Falls

    • Booming economy in Canada v. depressed downtown in New York


Conclusion l.jpg
Conclusion

  • Thus, the current conditions of Niagara Falls are due to:

    • Poor infrastructure

    • Changing economic conditions

    • Failure of economic development proposals

    • Declining population

    • Lack of private land ownership

  • Fortunately, Niagara Falls is still regarded as a tourist destination for families. This positive factor is the main reason why the Eco-Park proposal will be successful.


Niagara family eco park alternative future l.jpg

The Gorge Greenway

Love Canal Education/Interpretation Center

Upper River Interpretive Trail

Enhanced Niagara State Park Reservation

Eco-Renewable Housing

Niagara Gorge Hiking Trail & Discovery Center

Renewable Energy Learning & Instruction Center

Environmentally Augmented Artpark

Niagara Family Eco-Park Alternative Future






Slide22 l.jpg

Enhanced Niagara State Park

Photos courtesy of New York State Parks and Historic Preservation






Slide37 l.jpg

Environmentally Enhanced Artpark

Griffis Sculpture Park photos courtesy of Barry Boyer


The eco park l.jpg
The Eco-Park

People (and families) come to Niagara Falls “to be astonished and for the enjoyment of the beauty to be found in the natural scenery”

  • Frederick Law Olmsted

    Olmsted’s vision is still alive today. The Eco-Park is inherently eco-centric as it provides a vehicle allowing families to explore the interaction between the natural environment and technology.


Eco park benefits l.jpg

Improve Quality of Life

Recreation

Environment

Social

Education

Economic Development

Greenway

Downtown Niagara Falls

Consensus Builder

Relicensing Process

Eco-Park Benefits


Eco park consequences l.jpg
Eco-Park Consequences

  • New York Power Authority

    • Gorge Greenway: access to land, funding and operation

  • Weather

    • Many exhibits and features are outdoors-based

  • Robert Moses Parkway

    • Loss of roadway alongside gorge


Eco park implementation strategy l.jpg
Eco-Park Implementation Strategy

  • Phase I

    • Building Initial Support Among Stakeholders

  • Phase II

    • Stakeholders and the Power Authority’s Alternative Relicensing Process

  • Phase III

    • Implementation of the specific Eco-Park Projects


Eco park implementation dual tracked strategy l.jpg
Eco-Park Implementation:Dual Tracked Strategy

  • Relicensing

  • WNY as a Political swing region


Phase i building support among stakeholders l.jpg
Phase I--Building Support Among Stakeholders

  • Identification of stakeholders

  • Meet with various stakeholders:

    • Easy converts

    • Possible supporters

    • Challenging constituencies

  • Form a nonprofit or association to advocate for successful implementation of the Eco-Park


Phase ii building consensus for relicensing l.jpg
Phase II--Building Consensus for Relicensing

  • “United we stand, divided we fall” approach for alternative relicensing process

  • Develop consensus that Eco-Park proposal should be the primary “ask” during relicensing

    • Economic Development

    • Environmental Protection

    • Recreation/Quality of life


Phase iii specific projects l.jpg
Phase III--Specific Projects

  • Federal legislation specifically requires recreational and environmental factors be taken into account

  • The Family Eco-Park’s focus on recreation and environmental awareness provides an effective “trump card” that can be used to to successfully implement the Niagara Family Eco-Park


Gorge greenway l.jpg
Gorge Greenway

  • Propose Power Authority construct and operate Gorge Greenway

    • 1957 Federal Niagara Power Development Act guided Authority to develop $93 Million (2001 dollars) scenic park (Rob’t Moses Pkwy) as condition of licensing, the same precedent should apply for the Gorge Greenway

  • Creation of commission to oversee implementation of proposal


Love canal education center l.jpg
Love Canal Education Center

  • Independent from relicensing process

  • Lobbying strategy to persuade governor to mandate that DEC take title of property and provide half of construction costs

  • Love Canal 2000 would raise matching funds to build facility and operate educational center once operational


Upper river interpretive trail l.jpg
Upper River Interpretive Trail

  • Relicensing process will provide the opportunity to leverage Power Authority funding for several interpretative kiosks and pavilions along the upper river

  • NYSDOT to identify funds for traffic rerouting

  • Funds for redevelopment of brownfield (parking lot) obtained through the 1996 NYS Bond Act


Enhanced niagara state park reservation l.jpg

$500,000 for “Olmstedizing” Park

$400,000 to renovate the historic Goat Island horse barn

$50,000 for directional and interpretive signage

$30,000 to reduce traffic at the park

Enhanced Niagara State Park Reservation

Funding for several improvements and renovations has already been allocated or secured for the State Park over the last year including:


Eco renewable housing l.jpg
Eco-Renewable Housing

  • As part of relicensing Power Authority will “gift” a small parcel of land to USA Niagara Development Corp (NDC)

    • By proactively returning a small piece of land to tax rolls, the Power Authority will avert a full fledged assault for PILOTs

  • NDC will then select developer that specializes in green design by offering tax incentives and loan reductions


Niagara gorge hiking trail discovery center l.jpg

On October 4, 2000 the Power Authority committed $1.5 million to building the Discovery Center

One year ago Governor Pataki announced $300,000 of direct state aid for the trail

Shortly thereafter an additional $895,000 was committed for the project

Niagara Gorge Hiking Trail & Discovery Center

Discovery Center

Niagara Gorge Trail


Renewable energy learning instruction center l.jpg
Renewable Energy Learning & Instruction Center million to building the Discovery Center

  • No other institution has been as adversely impacted by the Power Authority as Niagara University

  • The Eco-Park plan proposes merging both the reparation owed to NU with the Power Authority and NYSERDA’s strengths and expertise in alternative energy development


Environmentally enhanced artpark l.jpg
Environmentally Enhanced Artpark million to building the Discovery Center

  • Power Authority was never mandated to complete an EIS when it ripped out a large portion of the gorge and dumped it at Artpark

  • While the environmental degradation caused by Power Authority can not be undone restitution can be provided

  • This restitution will form a Eco-Art endowment fund, which would be used to expand the arts and environment theme at the park


Other scenarios l.jpg

No Other Vision Presents An Opportunity for Each Stakeholder’s Interest to be Represented Adequately

Working River

Creation of jobs

Power Grid River

Negotiation strategy

Other Scenarios

  • Natural River

    • Ecology

  • Big Casino

    • Economics

  • Utopian River

    • Regional/nationalism


Other scenarios55 l.jpg
Other Scenarios Stakeholder’s Interest to be Represented Adequately

  • The Eco-Park:

    • Building Consensus

    • Economic Development

    • Recreation/Tourism

    • Ecology/Environment

    • Localism/Regionalism

    • Visions = Ideal Development Models

    • Quality of Life

    • Education

    • Identification of Potential Allies and Opponents


Niagara family eco park conclusion l.jpg
Niagara Family Eco-Park Stakeholder’s Interest to be Represented AdequatelyConclusion

Niagara Falls is truly at a crossroads. One road leads to continued infighting over meager scraps the Power Authority and other governmental leaders provide. The other road provides a proactive solution where stakeholders work together to create a nationally renowned Eco-Park that benefits the entire region. The vision has been created, a plan proposed, and a strategy constructed. The choice is clear.


May 3 2001 l.jpg

NIAGARA FAMILY Stakeholder’s Interest to be Represented AdequatelyECO-PARK

May 3, 2001

May 3, 2001

PREPARED BY:

RYAN A. MCPHERSON

PETER M. O’HARA

BRIAN KULPA


ad