Coalitions and Social Cleavages - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coalitions and social cleavages l.jpg
1 / 17

Coalitions and Social Cleavages. Societies have different social divisions (cleavages) Class divisions (upper/middle/lower class) Regional divisions (North/South...provinces vs. Capital) Economic-sector divisions (industries vs. agriculture)

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Coalitions and Social Cleavages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Coalitions and social cleavages l.jpg

Coalitions and Social Cleavages

  • Societies have different social divisions (cleavages)

    • Class divisions (upper/middle/lower class)

    • Regional divisions (North/South...provinces vs. Capital)

    • Economic-sector divisions (industries vs. agriculture)

    • Racial divisions (white vs. Black vs. Latinos, etc.)

  • Every country has different social cleavages

  • ChileUnited States

  • Upper/middle/lower classUpper/middle/lower class

  • Rural/CapitalRural/Capital

  • NO South/North divisionSouth/North econ. division

  • NO State divisionsState divisions

  • Mestizos/NativesWhite/Black/Hispanics/natives

The example of argentina l.jpg

The example of Argentina

  • Argentina: A rich country with high political and economic instability, why?

  • Coalition politics --> intra-elite conflicts explaining political and economic instability.

  • Coalitions that exclude great sectors of society. Different cleavages:

    • Provinces vs. Capital (conflicts among elites)

    • Landowners vs. Industrialists/workers (during the Peronist period)

    • Landowners/Financial sector vs. Workers (during Menem)

    • (NO significant racial division)

    • (NO significant peasant groups)

The example of brazil l.jpg

The Example of Brazil

  • Brazil: mid-level country in terms of human development.

  • The most unequal country in Latin America. High level of poverty, political and economic instability, why?

  • Different cleavages in society explaining :

  • North vs. South States

  • Landowners vs. Peasants

  • Industrialists vs. Workers

  • Rich vs. Poor

  • White/mulato vs. black

Brazil god is brazilian really l.jpg

Brazil:“God is Brazilian” (really?!)

  • Today Overview 160 million

  • mid-level of human development

  • High industrialization in LA

  • Nuclear capability

  • Rich in natural resources

  • Highest level of income inequality in LA

  • High levels of poverty (close to 50%)

  • The best soccer players in the world

  • Samba, jazz, musicians, and rhythm!

Brazil brief historical overview l.jpg

Brazil: Brief Historical Overview

  • Brazil colonized by Portugal

  • 1600s-1822 Colony with high level of autonomy from Portugal

  • Common path of economic development: export raw material to Portugal. Examples: Sugar, beans, coffee, rubber

  • Important trade of slaves from Africa (mixed society)

  • 1822-1889: Brazilian Empire (1870-1889: End of Slavery)

  • 1889-1930: First Republic (Governors’ decentralization)

Brazil socio economic cleavages l.jpg

Brazil:Socio-Economic cleavages

  • 1600s-1930s Economy based on raw material exports

  • 1800s- Sugar plantations in the North of Brazil (blacks)

  • Early 1900s: Rubber boom North and East

  • 1900s : Coffee (South of Brazil) (70% world market 1900/ 18% 1978)

  • Brazil depended on world economic up and downs

  • 1940s- : Industrialization in the South (Sao Paulo)

  • Brazil: two worlds

  • NorthSouth

  • Landlords sugarLandlords-coffee/industrialists

  • middle class in citiesmiddle class in cities

  • Black/peasantspeasants/industry workers

Brazil overview political development in the 20th century l.jpg

Brazil overviewPolitical development in the 20th century

  • Before 1930: Landlords controlling political development.

  • State governors disputed power (South-coffee, North-Sugar)

  • 1930-1945: Estado Novo (New State) Industrialization

    • Getulio Vargas

  • 1946-1964: New Republic

    • Several unstable governments

    • Military interventions (46/54/55/61/64)

  • 1964-1985: Military regime (economic miracle/political repression)

  • 1985- today: Democratic time

The main conflicts l.jpg

The main conflicts

  • Intra -elites conflicts (between the Sugar landowners and coffee landowners; between landlords and industrialists)

  • Among States. Governors control politics in each state. Central government has to deal with different states

  • Peasants fighting for land

  • Workers fighting for more rights

  • Middle class looking for safety/better income

  • Poor in cities (mostly blacks) fighting for food/housing

One solution estado novo vargas 1930 1945 l.jpg

One “solution”:Estado Novo (Vargas 1930-1945)

  • What are the main changes Vargas tried to introduce?

    • Economically?

    • Politically?

    • Institutionally?

  • How did he do it?

  • Why did he fall in 1945?

Another solution military regime 1964 1985 l.jpg

Another “solution”:Military regime (1964-1985)

  • Military: high history of intervention in politics

    • 1930/1937/1945/1954/1955/1961

  • Bureaucratic-Authoritarian regime

  • Coalition of military officers/Technocratic/administration

  • highly anti-politics and anti-communists

  • 1964? Reaction toward Goulart social policies

  • Economic politics based on:

    • repression of labor unions

    • Incentives to investment through big projects

    • Impressive economic growth 1969-1978 (Brazilian Miracle)--Growth but increasing foreign debt.

Transition to democracy transition to neo liberal model l.jpg

Transition to DemocracyTransition to neo-liberal model

  • Politically:Economically

  • 1985-1990 Sarneyno growth/Inflation

  • 1990-1992 Collor de Mello (Empeachment)Neo-liberal reform

  • 1992-1994 FrancoMixed

  • 1994-1999 CardosoNeoliberal reform

  • 2000- Cardoso (reelection)Neoliberal reform

  • Main issues in Brazilian Politics:

  • a) Political corruption/ police corruption/

  • b) Landless movement. Cardoso promoted land reform

  • c) Need to stabilize economy (fiscal deficit/no growth/no revenues)

  • d) Conflicts between states and federal state spending

Poverty some data on la and brazil l.jpg

Poverty: Some data on LA and Brazil

  • Latin America

  • Brazil:

  • 10% of population earn $1 a day

  • (officially) 22% are below the poverty line

  • (extra-officially) 40% are below poverty line

  • 60% of population without access to basic drugs

  • 10% of the population is undernourished

The structural adjustment in brazil l.jpg

The Structural Adjustment in Brazil

  • Inflation in Brazil 1990-2000

Structural adjustment in brazil unemployment l.jpg

Structural Adjustment in Brazil: Unemployment

  • Unemployment in Brazil 1992-2000

Structural adjustment in brazil economic growth l.jpg

Structural Adjustment in Brazil:Economic Growth

  • GDP per capita

Structural adjustment in brazil fiscal deficit difference between total state expenses and revenues l.jpg

Structural Adjustment in Brazil:Fiscal DeficitDifference between Total State Expenses and Revenues

The main tensions today l.jpg

States pressure Federal state to increase state budgets

IMF, elites pressure to reduce taxes

Landless movement ask for land

Middle class want to keep jobs in the state

International organizations trying to protect the Amazons

Poor people protesting for lack of food, and basic rights

Federal State needs to reduce fiscal deficit--> pressures over states

Federal Sates needs revenues --> pressures over mid/upper class

Government give land in Amazons border

IMF and government try to reduce state apparatus

Corporations trying to influence the government to exploit natural resources

Government controlling social unrest

The main tensions today

  • Login