Feeding habits of swans
Download
1 / 28

Feeding Habits of Swans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 593 Views
  • Updated On :

Feeding Habits of Swans. Daijiro Hata. http://www.flickr.com/photos/singingfish/259448032/. Characteristics of Swans. Anseriforms, Anserinae – 8 species. Large body Herbivory Social – make flocks Migratory waterfowl

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Feeding Habits of Swans' - Jimmy


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Feeding habits of swans l.jpg

Feeding Habits of Swans

Daijiro Hata

http://www.flickr.com/photos/singingfish/259448032/


Characteristics of swans l.jpg
Characteristics of Swans

  • Anseriforms, Anserinae – 8 species.

  • Large body

  • Herbivory

  • Social – make flocks

  • Migratory waterfowl

    most of the translocated swans return to the original places the following year.

  • Use wetlands for foraging and nesting.


Slide3 l.jpg

N American Swans

Mute swan

Trumpeter swan

Tundra swan



Food type of swans l.jpg
Food Type of Swans

  • 3 types of food

    1) Agricultural plants

    - High carbohydrates

    2) Wetland plants

    - Lower carbohydrates than ag. plants

    - Some high water & high fiber content

    3) Animal matter

    - High protein


Aquatic plants l.jpg
Aquatic Plants

  • Especially, Pondweed (Potamogeton spp.)

    - Swans eat tubers, seeds, ….

    - Foraging swans go to find pondweeds.

    (Earnst & Rothe 2004)

  • Others

    - Eelgrass or Wild celery (Vallisneria spp.)

    - Widgeon grass (Ruppia spp.)

    - Muskgrass or Skunkweed (Chara spp.)


Slide8 l.jpg

Sago pondweed

Eelgrass or Wild celery

Widgeon grass

Muskgrass or Skunkweed

http://aquaplant.tamu.edu



Population of swan l.jpg
Population of Swan

  • Population of swans have increased.

    - Conservation

    - Management for recreation

    hunting, watching

    - Low enforcement


Slide11 l.jpg

  • Trumpeter swan: Rocky Mountain Pop.

    from <200 (1935) to 2200 (1993) .

    (Baskin 1993, Squires & Anderson 1995)

  • Mute swan: Atlantic Flyway Pop.

    from 200 (1955) to 5300 (1987), 12600 (1999).

    (Conover & Kania 1994, USGS Website 2001)

  • Tundra swan: Pacific Flyway Pop.

    increased since 1940s, Western 50000(1958),

    60000 (2005). (Eastern 100000)

    (Sherwood 1960, ADFG Website 2005)


Slide12 l.jpg

USGS Website 2001

Mute swan

(Atlantic Flyway)

http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/resshow/perry/muteswan.htm#Background

Noordhuis et al. 2002.

Mute & Bewick’s swan

(Netherlands)


Problems of swans l.jpg
Problems of Swans

  • Population have increased.

  • Wetlands & habitats have declined.

  • Make flocks & concentrate in the scarce habitats.

  • Large, but the limited digestive capacity.

    (21-34%: Mitchell & Wass 1995)

    - Eat a lot.

  • Wave & Overexploitation of plants

    - Possible to destroy ecosystem in wetlands.

    - And compete with other animals.


E coast chesapeake bay l.jpg
E Coast & Chesapeake Bay

  • Wildlife managers say…Tundra swan

    1) Significant damage to aquatic plants.

    2) Conflict with other shorebirds.

  • Once MBTA (Migratory Bird Treaty Act) did not distinguish b/w native and non-native bird.

  • But, congress revised MBTA to exclude non-native birds in 2004.


Migratory bird treaty act l.jpg
Migratory Bird Treaty Act

  • Implemented treaties with Great Britain for Canada ratified in 1919, and Mexico 1936.

  • For the protection of migratory birds and provided for regulations to control taking, selling, transporting, and importing migratory birds.

  • This act was an important step in the development of international law.



Slide17 l.jpg

Grazing

  • Submersed, emergent, and floating-leaved macrophytes are all subject to substantial grazing losses.

  • Many large and small grazers may affect: manatees, muskrats, waterfowl, fish, crayfish, and insects (Lodge 1991).

Rees 1990.


Role of swans in wetlands l.jpg
Role of Swans in Wetlands

  • Grazing

    Slow down the succession of wetlands.

    - Black-necked swan might play an important role as a regulator of aquatic plant biomass to cause a delay in ecological succession (Corti & Schlatter 2002).

  • Bring and drop nutrition in wetlands.

    - 40% of N and 75% of P in a wetland (Post et al 1998).

  • Cultivate wetlands.

  • Disperse plants and invertebrates.


Habits food availability l.jpg
Habits: Food Availability

  • Swans well know the cost/benefit.

    - Prefer places with

    high food densities & low competition.

    Swans visit high food density patches at a higher frequency.

    Strong negative correlation b/w the number of swan-days and the number of goose- and wigeon-days (reduction in the food supply).

    Food supply decrease  make smaller flocks and graze at several different sites. (Klaassen et al. 2006).

  • Shift the food habit flexibly.

    - aquatic plants  waste grains.


Shallow water mute swan in depths 50cm extensive grazing on sav l.jpg
Shallow Water(Mute swan: In depths <50cm extensive grazing on SAV)

Bewick’s swan: max depth is 0.89m, but prefer shallower water like <0.45m.

Nolet et al. 2006


Slide21 l.jpg

  • From winter to spring

  • - Potamogeton tubers were highly preferred.

  • Summer

  • - Potamogeton foliage.

  • - Nestling trumpeter swans prefer Potamogeton spp.

  • Chara spp. was eaten in proportion to its availability.

  • (Squires 1995)


Adverse results l.jpg
Adverse Results

  • Black swan population density was closely correlated with plant biomass.

  • Although the swan population became as high as 25/ha, direct grazing growth consumption was slight.

  • The grazing rate was 0.007/day, by comparison with plant growth rates of 0.06-0.10/day, and loss rates in periods of decline of 0.07-0.18/day.

  • Lack of light was far more important than swan grazing for plant decline.

    (New Zealand: Mitchell & Wass 1996)


Adverse results23 l.jpg
Adverse Results

  • Numbers of mute swan and Bewick’s swan showed significant correlations with food sources.

  • Swan numbers and their duration of stay were closely associated with the presence of Chara.

  • Grazing pressure was low during spring and summer, and Chara colonized the lake in spite of consumption. (Netherlands)

    (Noordhuis et al. 2002)


Slide24 l.jpg

Badzinski et al. 2006.


Other adverse results l.jpg
Other Adverse Results during the breeding or wintering season.

  • Lower active in the winter (Squires &Anderson 1997).

  • Little competition b/w whistling swans and other waterfowl for food and habitats (Sherwood 1960).

  • Feeding time did not change in response to a change in food biomass density (Nolet & Klaassen 2005).

  • Black swans are apparently highly mobile, and highly sensitive to quality of their habitat. The net daily population changes became as high as 40-50% on several days in summer. (Mitchell & Wass 1996).


Slide26 l.jpg

When different herbivores with similar food requirements live within the same ecosystem, the animal may not compete but form a grazing succession, where the feeding activity of one group improved conditions for other species present (Vesey-Fitzgerald 1960, Jarman & Sinclair 1979, Mddock 1979).


Conclusion l.jpg
Conclusion live within the same ecosystem, the animal may not compete but form a grazing succession, where the feeding activity of one group improved conditions for other species present (Vesey-Fitzgerald 1960, Jarman & Sinclair 1979, Mddock 1979).

  • Like rich & comfortable food place.

  • Results of swan grazing varies in species, places, and conditions.

  • Eutrophication or Good nutrient vector.

  • Not always affect reductions of plants.

    Destroyer or Succession regulator.

  • Not always compete with other animals.


Questions l.jpg
Questions? live within the same ecosystem, the animal may not compete but form a grazing succession, where the feeding activity of one group improved conditions for other species present (Vesey-Fitzgerald 1960, Jarman & Sinclair 1979, Mddock 1979).

Black-necked swan

Black swan

http://www.feathersite.com/Poultry/Swans/BRKBkNeck.html

http://www.colszoo.org/animalareas/islands/bswan.html


ad