Download
1 / 13
130 likes | 139 Views
As it is a duty towards us to maintain a check over the environment and along with this to maintain a balance in our daily activities. Even we should be aware regarding the happenings around us and an exploration is to be made regarding the rules and regulations and their implications. Our motive should be to maintain an ecological balance along with our progress.
E N D
Sustainable Tourism Development Proofreading Service www.locusassignments.com
Introduction In order to host Olympic Games, there is a bid held which was won by London on July 6, 2005 which assures that 2012 Olympics will be held in London. The decision of holding the events at the international level is really a big deal as it involves lots of things which require lots of analysis and majorly upon the social and tourism development sector. With the help of studies it is calculated that a positive results are on chart in UK’s economy as huge increase is noticed in international publicity and tourism along with this some industrial analysis and economists says that its consequences are not good as the negative impact is much more than the positive impacts. Somewhere the London Olympics are considered as a factor of business economic destruction in a wider sense. The report here elaborates different results of London Olympics in relation with UK’s economy with the help of tourism theories.
Benefit from the planning of tourism developments Rationale – In order to achieve the desired objective stakeholder go for tourism and travelling planning. This may also result in increasing opportunities in employment for stakeholders. Stakeholders here involve wildlife conservatories, local communities. It also led in enhanced coordination between the public sector and private sector organisation Local Community – 2012 Olympics in London involved local community also results into their increase in development and tourism. It covers hospitality industry, local banks and established business etc. as they help in appropriate organization of the development of (CLARK, 1984) Public Private Partnership - non-renewable resources were properly exploited and managed during London 2012 Olympics due to the partnership between the public sector and private sector bodies (STABLER, 1997).
Advantages of public/private sector tourism planning 1. Reduction of cost- Efficient management of resources and source, London Olympic 2012, by partnership in public and private sector for tourism planning resulted in greater cost reduction. The extra dumping was also restricted. 2. The sharing of risks- ‘Gain risk’ does not cover the capital cost and practical costs in London. So risk may be shared by government with private partners. The said risk is inclusive of deadlines not achieved in the allocation of services, issues arisen due to environmental control or other kind regulations and other costs. 3. Improved or maintained present services levels’- modernized way of allocation of resources so as to get maximum out of minimum.
4. Improvement in earnings- here, accuracy as to cost is maintained for particular service to set the rate of customers. Traditional ways of issuing services were replaced by the public-private partnership’s incentive income source. 5. Efficient application- capability may be increased by taking varied actions like development and formation of flexible method of procurement, getting enough capital funding in a speedy way and choice making etc. 6. Other types of economic benefits- involvement of private sector with government sector may result in enhanced industrial and job opportunities (Weaver, 2005).
Disadvantages of public/private sector tourism planning • Loss of government control- The partnership resulted in the involvement of both parties as to decision making in regards to risk sharing, decisions at managers level, price setting etc. This has led them to loosening of governmental control. • Labour issues and Political risks- government with less experience in the field may lead to political risks. • Duty issues- public was not clear in regards to the arrangements of services. This causes the larger government involvement to ensure proper obedience and feedback to the demand of public.
Insecurity as to services- issues like labour issues, political, financial or other like issues restricts the private sector from completing their promises. • The lack of competitor- competition paves the way for low cost, enhanced operations and modernization. • Service adaptability or Decreased quality – such contracts may lead to lower service quality and inadaptability. • Inequality as to choice process- due to traditional modes of service, biased may take place in selection process (INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITEE, 2012).
Conclusion From this report it is concluded that the tourism industry requires sustainability. As it is a duty towards us to maintain a check over the environment and along with this to maintain a balance in our daily activities. Even we should be aware regarding the happenings around us and an exploration is to be made regarding the rules and regulations and their implications. Our motive should be to maintain an ecological balance along with our progress.
Contact Us Mail Us: support@locusassignments.comVisit us: www.locusassignments.com
