1 / 22

The Inflationary Model of the Big Bang

The Inflationary Model of the Big Bang. Quantum Field Theory Presentation Peter Williams 1 st December 2005. Outline. Introduction The standard Big Bang model Limitations of the model The Inflationary Big Bang model requirements Field potential Vacuum states

Download Presentation

The Inflationary Model of the Big Bang

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Inflationary Model of the Big Bang Quantum Field Theory Presentation Peter Williams 1st December 2005

  2. Outline • Introduction • The standard Big Bang model • Limitations of the model • The Inflationary Big Bang model • requirements • Field potential • Vacuum states • Evolution during inflation

  3. The Big Bang • Proposed to have occurred ~ 15 billion years ago • bringing the universe into existence • Penzias & Wilson (1962) discovered an isotropic background microwave signal • found to have a 2.7 K black body signature • remnant signal of the Big Bang explosion • COBE supports the theory with further observations of the microwave background

  4. Standard Big Bang Model

  5. Limitations • Standard model only goes as far back as 1 second after the initial Big Bang • All parameters from that point considered as initial conditions • Three main inconsistencies with observations • Horizon problem • Flatness problem (W = r/rc = 1 ?) • Smoothness problem • Need a model to account for earlier times and to overcome problems

  6. Horizon Problem • Two distant regions of microwave background have similar temperatures • But they are too far apart to be causally connected

  7. Flatness Problem • Why is space so flat ? • i.e. 0.1 < W < 2.0 • Initial condition of BB model unsatisfactory • at t = 1 s, W = 1 to within 1:1015 • Initial condition assumed, not explained

  8. Smoothness Problem • Microwave background smooth on large scale • Deviations from homogeneity seen • accounts for galaxies, clusters, etc. • Treated as an initial condition • the model needs to explain the features

  9. Early Inflationary Models • Landau & Starobinsky (1979) • based on theories of anomalies in quantum gravity • does not account for how inflation starts • Guth (1981) • exponential expansion at some early stage of the universe • results in phase transitions and supercooling • renounced due to inhomogeneities • Linde (1982) • results of Guth not used • uses chaotic fluctuations and checks for inflation

  10. Inflationary Big Bang

  11. Immediate Consequences • Inflation immediately popular by solving many standard problems • horizon problem solved leading to an early universe in equilibrium • driven rapidly to 1 (balloon analogy) • Negative pressure required for inflation • Phase transition • Symmetry breaking

  12. Mechanisms Behind Inflation • Best candidate is QFT • a theory of matter at high energies • Construct a Lagrangian for a scalar field • Apply the action • Find the equation of motion • should be Klein-Gordon in form • Find the energy density potential • a function of the scalar field

  13. ‘Old’ Inflation • Lagrangian: • Potential: a b

  14. Mechanism • Initial condition (t = 10-34 s) • zero scalar field, non-zero potential • stable equilibrium • ‘false vacuum’ • Negative pressure causes inflation • Needs to reach true vacuum • Tunneling must occur to do so

  15. Result • Advantages • universe does inflate • initial conditions of standard BB not required • in fact, they are produced • problems of standard BB solved (most of them!) • Potential energy → mass = PARTICLES! • Disadvantages • field must tunnel through potential • ‘Bubble nucleation’ occurs • bubbles of true vacuum expand in a sea of false vaccum • leads to inhomogeneous universe • microwave background is smooth on the large scale

  16. ‘New’ Inflation • Lagrangian: • Potential: s s

  17. Mechanism • Initial condition (t = 10-34 s) • zero scalar field, non-zero potential • unstable equilibrium • ‘false vacuum’ • Negative pressure causes inflation • Quantum fluctuations perturb field toward true vacuum • ‘Slow rolling’ towards V(j) = 0

  18. Result • All the advantages of the old model kept • Tunneling not required • Further complications such as the phase transitions not required • Universe now smoothed out • Many mini-universes produced as opposed to a singular model

  19. Successes • The inflation model solves the left over problems of the standard model • Assumptions of standard model not required • Invocation of Higgs field • Gives insight into pre-inflation era • Creates particles

  20. Further Details • The potential well of the true vacuum leads to coherent oscillations • discussed in detail in literature • Linde produces ‘chaotic, self-reproducing inflationary universe’ • locally the universe is homogeneous • global complex structure • many universes linked by Planck-length sized tubes • Further models adopt super-symmetry and string-theory

  21. Conclusions • Inflation not only substantiates, but furthers and improves the Big Bang model • It agrees well with observation • Successfully uses quantum field theory • evolution of scalar (Higgs) field • production of particles • Plays an important role in the research of new physics • Requires a field theory of gravity for further improvement

  22. References • Börner G. (1988) The Early Universe, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany • Bradenberger R.H. (1990) in Physics of the Early Universe, eds. Peacock J.A., Heavens A.F., Davies A.T., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK, 281-360 • Guth A.H., Steinhardt P.J. (1984) SciAmer, 116-128 • Linde A. (1987) Physics Today, 40(9), 61-68 • Linde A. (1994) SciAmer, 48-55

More Related