Crossing the cultural divide teams and the iupui university library
Download
1 / 60

Crossing the Cultural Divide: Teams and the IUPUI University Library - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 295 Views
  • Uploaded on

Crossing the Cultural Divide: Teams and the IUPUI University Library. David W. Lewis Dean of the IUPUI University Library Living the Future 4 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ April 26, 2002. Prelude: David’s Two Observations. Observation 1:.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Crossing the Cultural Divide: Teams and the IUPUI University Library' - Gideon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Crossing the cultural divide teams and the iupui university library l.jpg

Crossing the Cultural Divide: Teams and the IUPUI University Library

David W. Lewis

Dean of the IUPUI University Library

Living the Future 4

University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

April 26, 2002



Observation 1 l.jpg
Observation 1: Library

25 years ago the most important thing libraries did was keep millions and millions of small pieces of paper in the correct order.

The organizational structures and the culture that made it possible not to loose very many of those millions of pieces of paper was required then.

Today these structures and that culture have become counterproductive.


Observation 2 l.jpg
  Observation 2: Library

The purpose of libraries is to provide the members of the communities or organizations they serve with an information subsidy.

Without this subsidy information is not used to the extent that will provide the most benefit to the organization or community.

It is the subsidy, not the mechanism that currently provides it (the library) that is important.


Iupui university library s story l.jpg
IUPUI University Library Library’s Story

Today I will tell the story of the IUPUI University Library’s five year journey as a team-based organization.

The focus will be on the strategies that have evolved to more successfully deal with our technology intensive environment and the expectations of our involvement with student success and retention.


Underlying assumption l.jpg
Underlying Assumption Library

My underlying assumption is that all libraries must cross the cultural divide that separates organizations which are internally focused on control and continuity from those that are outward looking, fast moving, and innovative.

Without cultural change libraries will not be able to adapt to the many disruptive technological changes that are taking place in their environment.


Theoretical underpinning disruptive change l.jpg
Theoretical Underpinning: LibraryDisruptive Change

Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, New York: HarperBusiness, 2000.


Clayton m christensen sustaining versus disruptive technologies l.jpg
Clayton M. Christensen: Sustaining versus Disruptive Technologies

  • Sustaining technologies improve the performance of of established products along dimensions of performance that mainstream customers in major markets have historically valued.

  • Disruptive technologies bring a very difference value proposition to the market than has been previously available. Generally, disruptive technologies initially under perform established products in mainstream markets. But they have other features that are valued by a few fringe (and generally new users) users.


Clayton m christensen sustaining versus disruptive technologies9 l.jpg
Clayton M. Christensen: Sustaining versus Disruptive Technologies

  • Sustaining technologies - Established organizations are generally good at change involving sustaining technologies.

    • Follow the best customers

    • Service models are not fundamentally changed

    • Quality improves

    • Added cost justified by improved service


Clayton m christensen sustaining versus disruptive technologies10 l.jpg
Clayton M. Christensen: Sustaining versus Disruptive Technologies

  • Disruptive technologies - Establish organizations generally fail when change involves disruptive technologies. Organizations at the periphery succeed.

    • Design product or service for new, rather than established, users

    • Cheaper, faster, easier — even if quality is not high at the outset

    • Service models disrupted

    • Faster rate of development


Change in libraries l.jpg
Change in Libraries Technologies

  • Change from Paper Library to Automated Library (1965-1995) was a Sustaining Change

  • Change from Automated Library to Electronic Library (1995 to date) is a Disruptive Change

    From Michael Buckland, Redesigning Library Service: A Manifesto, Chicago: American Library Association, 1992.


Disruptive change in libraries l.jpg
Disruptive Change in Libraries Technologies

  • Collections

    • Open Archives (ePrint servers) are challenging journals as means of scholarly communication

    • Web archives (like American Memory) make large collections available without institutional affiliation

    • eBooks will happen soon (libraries might not be players)

    • Collections are not hand crafted one item at a time as they once were

      • Collections purchased with partners

      • Collections purchased by large entities (states) on behalf of citizens not libraries


Disruptive change in libraries13 l.jpg
Disruptive Change in Libraries Technologies

  • Bibliographic Control

    • Bibliographic control purchased rather than made one item at a time (Marchive, PromptCat, Serials Solutions)

    • Access to items not owned as, or more important. than access owned items

    • Catalogs are for machines, not people (SFX and other linking systems)

    • Portal battle — library catalog versus Goggle, library interface versus Science Direct (Elsevier), or library interface versus state interface (INSPIRE, etc.)

    • Trade-off between collections and bibliographic control


Disruptive change in libraries14 l.jpg
Disruptive Change in Libraries Technologies

  • Reference

    • Alternative reference providers

      • OCLC Remote Reference Collaboration

      • LSSI Chat Reference Service

    • Mass customization of services is expected by users (MyLibrary)

    • Alternative expert advice is available on the web

  • Instruction

    • Involvement in curriculum development rather than “library instruction”

    • Need to have measurable impact on student success and retention


Performance oversupply l.jpg
Performance Oversupply Technologies

“Once the performance level demanded of a particular attribute has been achieved, customers indicate their satiation by being less willing to pay a premium price for continued improvement in that attribute. Hence, performance oversupply triggers a shift in the basis of competition, and the criteria used by customers to choose one product over another.”

— Clayton M. Christensen





Slide19 l.jpg

“It is simply impossible to predict with any useful degree of precision how disruptive products will be used or how large their market will be. An important corollary is that, because markets for disruptive technologies are unpredictable, companies’ initial strategies for entering these markets will generally be wrong.”

— Clayton M. Christensen

Librarians love to plan. In the old world this was a critical skill. It may now be a waste of time.


Slide20 l.jpg

“The dominant difference between successful ventures and failed ones, generally, is not the astuteness of their original strategy. Guessing the right strategy at the outset isn’t nearly as important to success as conserving enough resources… so that new business initiatives get a second or third stab at getting it right.”

— Clayton M. Christensen

Libraries rarely have, or can acquire, flexible resources.


Slide21 l.jpg

“Managers confronting disruptive technologies need to get out of their laboratories and focus groups and directly create knowledge about new customers and new applications through discovery-driven expeditions into the marketplace.”

— Clayton M. Christensen

Need to be close to users so you can watch what they do (rather than listen to what they say).

Librarians hate to leave their buildings or roam too far from home.


Slide22 l.jpg

“Blindly following the maxim that good managers should out of their laboratories and focus groups and directly create knowledge about new customers and new applications through keep close to their customers can sometimes be a fatal mistake.”

— Clayton M. Christensen

All organizations are depended on customers and investors — their value network. Companies make decisions in the context of this value network.

Since disruptive products bring a different kind of value old customers don’t see the need for them.


Slide23 l.jpg

  • Can we consider that buying books may not be the best use of our resources?

  • Can we act on what learn from freshman when what they teach us runs it runs counter to what the faculty say they want?

  • Can we trust small groups develop products or does everyone have to buy-in to everything?

  • Are we willing to develop exploratory systems and services assuming many will fail?






Structures for confronting change lesson from christensen l.jpg
Structures for Confronting Change - Lesson from Christensen our resources?

  • Since libraries can rarely create autonomous organizations to manage change...

  • Changing culture is required!! Need to match the library’s values to the new environment



Slide30 l.jpg

  • Changing culture is hard!!! our resources?

    • War and famine

    • Change what individuals need to do to be successful in the organization and in their careers

    • Change the rules in the middle of the game



Indiana university purdue university indianapolis32 l.jpg
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis our resources?

  • Urban campus of Indiana University

  • Founded 30 years ago from extension programs of IU and Purdue in Indianapolis

  • Health Sciences campus; most graduate programs have professional orientation

  • More sponsored research than any campus in Indiana

  • Strong commitment to serve the Indianapolis/Central Indiana community

  • Campus tends to be entrepreneurial and collaborative


Indiana university purdue university indianapolis33 l.jpg
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis our resources?

  • Students: 27,000 headcount, 16,000 FTE

  • Mostly commuting, many non-traditional (average undergraduate is 26 years old; works 30 hours per week, and has 5 hours per week of dependent care responsibilities)

  • Retention is a major concern (six year graduation rate is about 25%)

  • Awards Indiana University or Purdue University degrees

  • Largest range of academic programs of any campus in Indiana


Iupui university library l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?


Iupui university library35 l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?

  • Supports all programs except: health sciences and law

  • Budget: $7.8 million

    • $4.0 compensation

    • $2.7 million for materials

  • Staff: 90 total

    • 30 librarians (with faculty status)

    • 15 professionals (mostly technologists)

    • 45 clerical

  • Collections

    • 600,000 volumes

    • 20% of expenditures for electronic resources

    • Leading collection in Philanthropy in the nation


Iupui university library36 l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?

  • New building in 1993 with focus on technology

  • Technology innovations as a result

    • Web interface to all library applications in 1993

    • One of first libraries with many public computers with non-library applications

    • Early adapter of electronic reserves

    • SFX beta

    • Chat reference


Iupui university library advantages l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?Advantages

  • Not encumbered with historical collections — no old paper

  • Library system (OPAC, etc.) run from Bloomington

  • Campus expects us to use technology as route to excellence

  • Campus expects us to contribute to student success and retention

  • Good support from campus leadership

  • Responsibility centered budgeting - provides fiscal flexibility


Iupui university library advantages38 l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?Advantages

  • New building (opened in summer of 1993) and jump to technology that accompanied the new building, broke the library from past in dramatic way

  • Created change in culture because of technology and because the library became a leader


Iupui university library disadvantages l.jpg
IUPUI University Library our resources?Disadvantages

  • Aging librarians tied to the campus by tenure and 18/20 retirement plan (golden handcuffs)

  • Tight market for technologists

  • Need to be both collaborative with the Bloomington campus and independent from it

  • Campus is underfunded

  • No one can figure out who we are



Iupui university library priorities l.jpg
IUPUI University Library Priorities our resources?

1. Increase retention — actively contribute to curriculum redesign

• Instructional Teams for Freshman Learning Communities (20 a year five years ago; 125 for the past three years)

• Center for Teaching and Learning

• Gateway Initiative - redesign of big intro courses

• Electronic Portfolio

2. Develop strong technology base for delivering library collections and services

• Can’t afford to build strong paper collections

• Required for distributed teaching and learning

• Serves our students


Slide42 l.jpg

Mission Statement: our resources? The IUPUI University Library honors tradition, but looks to the innovative application of technology and new forms of engagement with our various publics as our path to excellence.

Vision: To be the innovative leader among urban university libraries


University library strategies l.jpg
University Library Strategies our resources?

  • Teams with overlapping team assignments

  • Recently developed of client-focused teams for our services group

  • Flat hierarchy

  • Three times a year “organization weeks”

  • Birkman Assessment Tool

  • Commitment to developing talent internally

  • Focus on assessment and performance measures


Teams and the university library l.jpg
Teams and the University Library our resources?

  • Reorganized into a team-based organization in 1997

  • Top town decision made and executed by senior management

  • Technical Services and Public Services dissolved as large powerful groups

  • Hierarchy flattened

  • Initial focus on instruction through the development of “instructional teams”

  • Most librarians on multiple teams


Overlapping team assignment l.jpg
Overlapping Team Assignment our resources?

  • When we first organized in teams we did this to fill out the teams

  • Much overlap between technology teams

  • Much overlap between the Reference Team, the Instruction Team, and the Collections Team

  • Some overlap as coordinating mechanism (Digital Libraries and Reference, Digital Libraries and Cataloging, Cataloging and Special Collections)

  • Most librarians has liaison responsibilities, but they were not accommodated in the structure


Overlapping team assignment48 l.jpg
Overlapping Team Assignment our resources?

  • Worked very well for technology teams, they have become a self managing group

  • Coordinating overlaps works

  • Reference/Instruction/Collections overlaps caused a great deal of stress

    • Most of dual team assignments were held by “line” librarians (many untenured) who got caught between demands of multiple team leaders

    • Liaison activities, which were often very rewarding for librarians, “did not count”

    • Everyone wanted off the Instruction Team because it was the director’s high profile project and if you were involved it sucked up all of your time


Client focused teams l.jpg
Client-Focused Teams our resources?

  • Instituted May 2001

  • Disbanded the Instruction and Collection Teams

  • Created four teams focused of groups of schools (the significant academic units)

    • Liberal Arts Team

    • SETN Team

    • Professional Programs Team

    • University College Team

  • Client teams responsible for instruction, advanced reference, and collections for group of schools

  • Liaison became common responsibility, especially instruction

  • Largely resolved issues with instruction


Client focused teams50 l.jpg
Client-Focused Teams our resources?

  • Each Team appointed a person to coordinate collections, reference, and instruction

  • The coordinators for collection and instruction meet periodically

  • Reference Team kept responsibility for desk services

  • Reference coordinators were members of the Reference Team

  • Reference has been this year’s area of conflict


Flat hierarchy l.jpg
Flat Hierarchy our resources?

  • We have four layers in the organization:

    • Dean

    • Team Leader

    • Team member

    • Hourly (student) workers

  • 10% rule

  • Makes micro-management difficult

  • Encourages and protects innovation

  • Requires cross team coordination


Organization weeks l.jpg
Organization Weeks our resources?

  • Started as “team” training sessions — meeting management, conflict resolution, etc,

  • Now done three times per year (January, May, and August)

  • Three days —“weeklet”

  • All staff are expected to participate - no vacations

  • Dean’s talk and food always involved

  • Once or twice a year outside training or consultant — issues change based on organizational focus and needs

  • One week (May) for annual planning


Organization weeks55 l.jpg
Organization Weeks our resources?

  • Demonstrates our commitment to organizational growth and development

  • Provides time for teams

  • Provides opportunity to mix individuals across teams in various activities

  • Allows regular formal opportunity for the dean to communicate with the organization

  • Recognize accomplishments

  • Try to have fun (Beanie Baby drop)


Birkman assessment tool l.jpg
Birkman Assessment Tool our resources?

  • Birkman is a Myers/Briggs like tool that assess work style on a variety of dimensions

  • Everyone takes the Birkman when they join the organization

  • Developed internal expertise

  • Reinforces the fact that we all work differently and gives the organization a common vocabulary to talk about this

  • Useful in managing team conflict


Develop talent internally l.jpg
Develop Talent Internally our resources?

  • Explicit with technology teams (can’t afford developed talent)

    • Hire staff with good fit to the organization

    • Encourage and fund training ($10,000 training fund managed by technology team leaders)

  • New Team Leaders hired from within whenever possible

  • Good support for librarian and clerical professional development


Assessment and performance measures l.jpg
Assessment and Performance Measures our resources?

  • Raise the “Visibility of Consequences”

  • Campus measures — student and faculty satisfaction surveys

  • Standard measures

    • Circulation

    • Gate Counts

    • Use of electronic resources

  • Our own satisfaction survey


What is required of new world library organizations l.jpg
What is Required of New World Library Organizations? our resources?

1. Change the culture

2. Create structures that encourage and reinforce the cultural change

Changing structures (moving to teams, etc.) disturbs establish culture - this is good


Questions david w lewis iupui university library dlewis@iupui edu 317 274 0493 l.jpg
Questions? our resources?David W. LewisIUPUI University Librarydlewis@iupui.edu317-274-0493


ad