1 / 38

Structuralism & Poststructuralism (1): Linguistic (De-)Constructions of Meanings and Subjectivities

Structuralism & Poststructuralism (1): Linguistic (De-)Constructions of Meanings and Subjectivities. 1. Structuralism--Basic Concepts 2. Structuralist Reading of Narratives 3. Semiotics and "The Myth Today" 4. From Structuralism to Poststructuralism: Binary Opposition & Deconstruction.

Audrey
Download Presentation

Structuralism & Poststructuralism (1): Linguistic (De-)Constructions of Meanings and Subjectivities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Structuralism & Poststructuralism (1): Linguistic (De-)Constructions of Meanings and Subjectivities 1. Structuralism--Basic Concepts 2. Structuralist Reading of Narratives 3. Semiotics and "The Myth Today" 4. From Structuralism to Poststructuralism: Binary Opposition & Deconstruction

  2. Structuralism: Introduction 1. How does language produce meanings? 2. Structuralist Approach (1): basic pattern and binary opposition How is structure different from form? How is New Criticism different from Structuralism?

  3. Outline • How does language produce meanings? A. Language in Daily Language: Example 1 B. Different views of language:Example 2: sign = signifier and signified  referent; -- Structuralist view • Structuralist Approach(I):Binary Opposition and Basic Pattern Example: 1, 2, 3, 4 3. From New Criticism to Structuralism

  4. A. Language in Daily Language 罵髒話; the uncertainties of meanings. The meanings of language are not inherent (內在的).They depend on the context. Structuralism: Language is a system of relation and difference. 「政府官員」的意義決定於它和「平民百姓」的不同;和「相聲演員」相近 . 白馬非馬White Horse is Not Horse. Why?

  5. 白馬非馬︰Possible interpretations 「馬者,所以命形也;白者,所以命色也。命色者非名形也。故曰: “白馬非馬”。」 公孫龍子 - 白馬論第二 1. 「白」是顏色 「馬」是形狀, • 馬是大範疇  白馬(馬中的一小範疇﹚ 3. Structuralism:白馬 is a sign; it refers to our concept of “white horse,” but not the actual horse.

  6. De Saussure sign = signifier and signified The inclusion of the concept within the triad of signification suggests that there is no natural or immediate relation between the words白馬(as a sign) and the ‘thing’馬(actual white horse).

  7. Different Views of Language A. In Chinese Philosophy • 言者,所以在意,得意而忘言。〈莊子.外物〉得兔忘蹄、得魚忘筌、得意忘言 王弼說:「言者象之蹄也,象者意之筌。……言者所以明象,得象而忘言。象者所以存意,得意而忘象。」(reference﹚  語言(言、象:象卦﹐symbols?﹚用為做工具 • 意:the meanings referred to or 道.

  8. Different Views of Language B. Structuralism: Meanings happen in language. A rose is a rose, because it is different from . . . [ros] Carnation grass rose (p. of rise) [doz]

  9. Different Views of Language B. Structuralism: Meanings happen in language. A rose is a rose, because -- its phoneme [o] is different from [ai] in [rise]; -- its morpheme [rose] is different that with an extra morpheme [roses]; • Its meaning is determined by the syntax or context it exists in ; e.g. “Then glut thy sorrow on a morning rose . . . “ “Plant thou no roses at my head,Nor shady cypress tree:Be the green grass above meWith showers and dewdrops wet;” “The pillow rose and floated under her, pleasant as a hammock in a light wind. ”

  10. sign = signifier and signified "The linguistic sign is arbitrary. It is unmotivated, i.e. arbitrary in that it actually has no natural connection with the signified."   -- e.g. The signs “dog,” “chien,” “狗” arbitrarily refer to the concept of the animal dog. -- Can be replaced by other signs; -- Can create ambiguities. -- What about Onomatopoeia, 象形文字? Are there natural resemblances between the signs and what they refer to? (e.g. Cock-a-doodle-do, cocorico & 喔喔啼; ruff & 汪汪)

  11. structural linguistics:Ferdinand de Saussure(textbook chap 3 pp. 89-95) 1857-1913, Swiss linguist; one of the founders of modern linguistics. Major ideas: 1. The synchronic vs. the diachronic; langue vs. parole 2.Language is a system of difference.Meaning occurs in binary opposition between two signs. (e.g. toy, boy) 3.sign = signifier and signified; the connection between them is arbitrary.

  12. Language as a system of relation and difference Relations: toy  boy (sound),  table (noun; grammatical unit),  girl (antonym), etc. Difference: binary opposition I saw a girl in red. (syntagmatic relations) I am a girl. a boy, a dog, (paradigmatic relations) an ironing board.

  13. Different Views of Language • de Saussure: synchronic studies of language as a system of difference; • Roman Jakobson: meaning happens in communication from sender to receiver, determined also by the medium and code used. • Kristeva’s the semiotic: The language as rhythms and drives supporting and disrupting the logical/linear communication in language. • Atwood: Language as both social and self constructions. (e.g. love and her narration)

  14. Units: Example – phonemes words Princess, prince and a stepmother Rules: How to  combine into words  Select and combine into a sentence.  combine into a fairy-tale. (Snow White and Cinderella are in structure the same story.) Structuralist Approach (1): Basic Objects of Study Patterns –of basic units; --of selection and combination

  15. Langue or signifying system 表意系統: Examples: -- Literary work, -- narratives (e.g. myth) -- tribal or community ritual (a wedding, a rain dance, a graduation ceremony) -- "fashion“ (in clothes, food, cars, etc.) -- any kind of advertisement Structuralism: From Units & Rules to Basic Structure of a Certain Langue

  16. Structuralist Approach (1) Structuralism: Examine the “basic elements” (or basic units), which form the basic pattern (or grammar) of each story.  Basic elements: 最小元素 + “universal” (or common) grammar  a scientific approach to literature. e.g. binary opposition

  17. Practice I: 樂 府 詩箜篌引 「公無渡河,公竟渡河,墮河而死,當奈公何?」 Binary opposition between 公 and 河;between the speaker (女人?) and 公。 1.公試著克服河  公被河克服。 2. 公:(男﹚人;河:自然 3. Speaker : 試著阻止公;奈何公(自覺無力,或景仰公 human attempts to conquer the impossible﹚。

  18. Practice I: Variation (1): 「公無渡河,公竟渡河,墮河而死,當奈公何?」據說,這是漢代一對夫妻的悲慘境遇:一名白首狂夫不理會妻子在岸邊呼喚,逕自直奔水中央而捨去性命,他太太吟了這首詩以後,也投河自盡。(source: 枯萎年代 ﹚ Another basic unit: Mythemes (or themes): -- Liebestod (love death).梁祝 -- Conquering Nature: Prometheus  激流四勇士

  19. Practice I: Variation (2):向陽的四句聯 叫你別看偏偏還看看了也好免掉煩惱 Variation (3):公無渡河 ──詩誌八掌溪事件 《李友煌》.

  20. Practice II: “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” New Criticism: -- ironic tension built around the concept of ‘jilting’ and weatherall vs. aging. -- ambiguities produced in Granny’s mind.

  21. “Granny Weatherall”: A Structuralist Reading binary opposition between being jiltedand trying to love and to keep; Differences: -- jilted by her lover  her husband (who died) -- keeps a farm house and all the children but not Hapsy  loses her youth and beauty, -- loses touch with reality (without her knowing it) but keeps her self-consciousness; -- almost jilted by God  keeps her dignity by facing her death. (Her greatest loss is also a greatest gain.)

  22. Practice III: • The Oval Portraitbinary opposition between • Living background-- night, delirium of the speaker vs. clear narration of the past • abandoned castle:, vs. decoration rich but tattered and antique; • Armorial trophies vs. paintings in frames of rich golden arabesque • Image alive and soft vs. thick frame and the tradition of vignetting

  23. Practice 4  Cube Man Cube: Try to find out its pattern and what different signs refer to.  e.g. signs of “human” – bodily parts, human tools, human actions; setting.

  24. Cube Men Cube by Cerrit van Didn  Beginning and ending: why different?

  25. Cube Men Cube: ending

  26. Cube Men Cube  Setting one: outdoor scene; one cube appears.

  27. Cube Men Cube  Setting two:grass (then with zipper);

  28. Cube Men Cube  Setting three: domestic scene; Cloud

  29. Cube Men Cube  Setting four: outdoor again, smoking and producing little cubes.

  30. Cube Men Cube  Setting five: building facade

  31.  Tools: zipper, camera, national flag,  Human attributes: eye, hand, photos,  Human Action: taking photos, singing, doubling, lifting one flap after another, Cube Men Cube

  32. Action: swimming in a clothes-like sea, smoking, birthing, fighting Cube Men Cube

  33. Human: buildings, money bill, Tools: hand (fist), foot, stone, gun, machine gun, cannon Cube Men Cube

  34. Theme: gradual loss of nature; (e.g. nature zipped, in snow ball) A story of human growth, connections(e,g, human tools; doubling actions, extinguishing fire) and achievements, which turns to have more and more conflicts (cigarette, canon). Form: Human beings presented as cubes so that Humans and their lives are simplified and de-naturalized –just a group of signs forming some patterns; Humans with layers; Merging of humans and objects (e.g. tea box; camera eye; bird becoming one layer of a cube) Background music –light and beautiful, but can be militarist songs, too. Cube Men Cube: Interpretation

  35. Form    an entity with interrelated parts. Structure: basic pattern From New Criticism to Structuralism: Search for “the common” or the universal Pygmalion And Galatea,by Jean-Leon Gerome, after 1881

  36. From New Criticism to Structuralism Russian Formalism 1920’s  New Criticism: set up studies of English Literature as a discipline.  In the 50’s, there are more attempts at making English studies scientific and objective. e.g. archetypal approaches; Northrop Frye

  37. From New Criticism to Structuralism  Compared with New Criticism, structuralist approaches to literature are -- reductive; (化約式的﹚; -- more objective & scientific, does not rely on common sense. -- anti-Humanist -- Form to Structure, (later multiple language structures and the racial relations they imply).

  38. Readings for next week:  Structuralism: Historical development, sections on Saussure and Assumptions chap 3 (87-98; 100)  "Should Wizard Hit Mommy?" • Feel Free to read more. 

More Related