From structuralism to post structuralism deconstruction
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 53

From Structuralism to Post-Structuralism (Deconstruction) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 246 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

From Structuralism to Post-Structuralism (Deconstruction). Constructions of Meanings and Their Radical Uncertainty (2014 S). Reading Notes. The Basics: Poststructuralism vs. Liberal Humanism p. 118

Download Presentation

From Structuralism to Post-Structuralism (Deconstruction)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


From structuralism to post structuralism deconstruction

From Structuralism to Post-Structuralism (Deconstruction)

Constructions of Meanings and Their Radical Uncertainty (2014 S)


Reading notes

Reading Notes

  • The Basics:

    • Poststructuralism vs. Liberal Humanism p. 118

    • Poststructuralism: the Cretan paradox p. 119 –or the paradox between subject of enunciation and tne enunciated; e.g. Auto-biography

    • The illusion of presence p. 122

    • In defence of absence 124 – (including definition of Différance)

    • Binary oppositions revisited 128-

    • Literary deconstruction 131

    • Implication 135


Reading notes1

Reading Notes

Beginning Theory

  • “Structure, Sign and Play”

  • “There is nothing outside the text”

  • Comparison of Structuralism and Poststructuralism

  • Poststructuralism: methodology


Notes on oran s presentation

Notes on Oran’s Presentation

  • Differences between structuralism & poststructuralism

  • Difference – differentiation and postponement of presence

  • Death of the Author – you agree?

  • Discourse and Power

  • e.g.Huckleberry Finn


Quotations 1 traces of other words

Quotations (1): traces of other words

(Basics 125) Derrida argues that the same

holds for words: every single word contains traces of other words– theoretically of all the other words in the language system:

the signified concept is never present in and of itself, in a sufficient presence that would refer only to itself. Essentially and lawfully, every concept is inscribed in a chain or in a system within which it refers to the other, to other concepts. (Derrida [1982] 1996: 30)


Quotations 2 diff rance

Quotations (2): Différance

Meaning, then, is the product of difference and it is also always subject to a process of deferral. In fact, a word’s – or sign’s –relations to other words and to words that will follow are a condition for meaning – without those relations meaning would

not be possible. As Derrida puts it:

.


Quotations 2 diff rance1

Quotations (2): Différance

…the movement of signification is possible only if each so-called ‘present’ element, each element appearing on the scene of presence, is related to something other than itself, thereby keeping within itself the mark of the past element, and already letting itself be vitiated [contaminated] by the mark of its relation to the future element, this trace being related no less to what is called the future than to what is called the past, and constituting what is called the present by means of this very relation to what it is not (“Différance”)


Outline

Outline

  • Structuralism: A Brief Review (two examples)

  • Poststructuralist Views of Language & Reality

    • Language (Polysemy) and Reality

    • Jacque Derrida: (1) Différance

    • Jacque Derrida: (2) Transcendental Signified

  • Deconstruction: Practice:

    • e.g. Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”; Keats’“Ode on Melancholy”

    • e.g. “Refusal To Mourn The Death, By Fire, Of A Child In London”

  • Derrida in Context;Self-Conscious/Deconstructing Texts


Key words for structualist and semiotic approaches

Key words for Structualist and Semiotic approaches:

  • I. Following language as a model

  • II. Disclosing the deep/basic structure of a text, which is a (combination or selection) system of meaning composed of basic elements such as:

    • -- binaries, or semiotic rectangles,

    • -- roles/actant and functions,

    • -- mytheme,

    • -- narrator- narratee,

    • -- signs or signification on different levels (signifier and signified). Roland Barthes’ Semiotics


Semiotics some key concepts

Semiotics –Some Key Concepts

  • Culture is composed of different languages, or systems of signs;

  • Myth (or connotation) is constructed by emptying out or distorting the signs’ original meanings (denotation);

  • Myth is seductive, and its is apparently natural and innocent.


Examples for analysis gender identity

Examples for analysis: gender & identity

TOYOTA-VIOS 1.6-目光吸引篇

  • Signs? Objectification of the Woman?

  • Myth vs. Reality?


Two more examples for analysis gender identity

Two More Examples for analysis: gender & identity

TOYOTA-VIOS 1.6-目光吸引篇

  • Main idea: “What do you want?”“Vios, it’s everything.”

  • Signs:

    1) the car: Silver gray colors, in a clean but empty city with glass buildings;  easy, fast and smooth driving luxury and power (The whole city is emptied out.)

    2) Objectification of the Woman? A woman larger than life (with the power of T.V. wall+glass building) the woman’s flowing hair, gaze and smile are signs of the man’s self-projection of power, ease and desirability.

  • Distorted: city, the woman an ad and its interpellation(召喚) in disguise

  • Symptom Revealed: spectacle/image society; “The TV is watching us.”


Two more examples for analysis gender identity1

Two More Examples for analysis: gender & identity

.國際VISA組織-VISA在手盡其在我-羅拉(完整)篇

  • Signs? Connotations? Distortion?

  • Is the woman all powerful?


Two more examples for analysis gender identity2

Two More Examples for analysis: gender & identity

.國際VISA組織-VISA在手盡其在我-羅拉(完整)篇

  • Signs: frame within the frame

  • of the Gothic: woman in a cape; old mansion/computer game parlor; a secret pass;

  • of electronic game -- virtual reality with a woman presented in double;

  • sci-fi: strong woman in black tight-fit dress,

  • Is the woman all powerful?

    • Apparently, the two women empower each other;

    • Actually, the visa card is power.

  • Distortion: money = power; game = reality

  • Symptom Revealed:everything is construction, but the power of money and electronic game is stronger than anything else.


Poststructuralism

Poststructuralism

Keywords: constructionism  floating signifier

-- a major theoretical school in the postmodern age which radicalizes structuralist views of language by seeing signified as signifier, and separating signs from ‘reality.’

-- in conflict with many other theoretical schools such as Marxism, Feminism and Postcolonialism, but also get to be combined with them;

-- the areas of its influences range from arts, politics to popular culture.


Poststructuralism1

Poststructuralism

Keywords: constructionism  floating signifier


Poststructuralism theory

Poststructuralism: Theory

Major Questions

  • How does poststructuralism de-center traditional authorities?

  • Why is the author dead? Why is there nothing outside the text? Why is reality ‘textual,’ and individual, ‘a product of social and linguistic forces. . . ‘a tissue of textualities” (64-65)?

  • Why is signifier ‘floating,’ meaning disseminated, and text, “an endless free play of meanings”(66)?


1 how does poststructuralism de center traditional authorities

(1) How does poststructuralism de-center traditional authorities?

  • the traditional centers or foundations of our lives -- e.g. Truth, Humanity, Family, Nation, History, Reality, God, Creativity, Author  and their stable meanings

  • Physical analogy: the ground beneath our feet; fixed landmark – with which we feel stability and measure the other things;

    With their views of language’s fluidity, all the above fixed meanings are destabilized.

     Physical analogy: our perception on a moving train of another moving train//multiple signifying chains intersecting with one another textuality


2 why is the author dead

(2) Why is the author dead?

Why is reality ‘textual,’ and individual, ‘a product of social and linguistic forces. . . ‘a tissue of textualities” (Beginning 64-65)?

  • Self: No longer a unified self; in a system of relations with multiple Subject Positions

     Our social existence is modeled after language as a system of relations (e.g. kinship; gender)

     different languages (discourses) provide us with different subject positions. There are meanings in a text which its author is not aware of.  polysemy; e.g. 吹皺一池春水


2 why is the author dead1

(2) Why is the author dead?

Why is reality ‘textual,’ and individual, ‘a product of social and linguistic forces. . . ‘a tissue of textualities” (64-65)?

2. Text: From work, to text to (inter)textuality;

“There is nothing outside of text”

 No fixed boundaries; no stable meanings;

  • e.g. Internet and the world of ads


2 why is the author dead2

(2) Why is the author dead?

3. “The death of the author.”

 The birth of the Reader

4. Readings of Meaning and Reality:

1) deconstruction – to read against the grain; to find textual undecidability &

2) postmodern self-reflexivity –everything is representation and in need of interpretation(more examples later)


From structuralism to post structuralism deconstruction

Q 3: -- Why is signifier ‘floating,’ meaning disseminated, and text, “an endless free play of meanings”(Beginning 66)? Note: metaphors of dandelion or seeds


Which of the following statements are not ambiguous

Which of the following statements are not ambiguous?

  • I am 40 years old.

  • The Republic of China was born on Oct. 10, 1911.

  • I love you till the end of the world.

  • 多吃蔬菜﹐有益健康。

  • 中國人生性刻苦耐勞。

  • 你要做和事佬﹐真是吹縐一池春水。

  • The experience of the earthquake yesterday was quite uncanny.


Which of the following statements are not ambiguous1

Which of the following statements are not ambiguous?

  • I am 40 years old. Who is this “I”?

  • The Republic of China was born on Oct. 10, 1911. born?

  • I love you till the end of the world

     (現代啟示錄 can be a store name.)

     love?

  • 多吃蔬菜﹐有益健康。 insecticide? Vegi with blue cheese?

  • 中國人生性刻苦耐勞。 中國人?


Language literature as an enclosed system

Language/Literature as an enclosed system

Paradigmatic/Selection:

Syntagmatic/Combination

(narrative structure:

roles + actions);

metonymy

Thematic structure: Motifs, mythemes, metaphors, etc.


Polysemy caused by context

Polysemy caused by context

中國人生性刻苦耐勞。

Paradigmatic/Selection:

Syntagmatic/Combination

+ more stereotypical descriptions, or a father’s advice to his son, etc.

-中國人﹐華人Chinaman

-刻苦耐勞/現實/斤斤計較/不懂得人生樂趣


Why is language ambiguous

Why is language ambiguous?

  • Why are meanings undecidable & slippery?

    1. Polysemy: Traces of other signs, other meanings. (e.g. national “birthday”; 干卿底事)

    2. Multiple Context; Reference Undecidable. (e.g. “The end of the world” )

    3. Meaning is not “present” in language; it happens “in between” signifiers.

    4. (intention and the unconscious)


Multiple context

Multiple Context: 吹縐一池春水

Male poet and

Waiting woman.

  • 謁金門 馮延巳

    風乍起,吹縐一池春水。

    閒引鴛鴦香徑�,手挼紅杏蕊。

    鬥鴨闌干獨倚,碧玉搔頭斜墬。

    終日望君君不至,舉頭聞鵲喜。

  • 中主李璟很欣賞這首詞,便對馮延巳說:「吹皺一池春水,干卿底事?」馮延巳答道:「怎及你的細雨夢回雞塞遠,小樓吹徹玉笙寒呢?」

    (http://203.198.70.29/subject/chlt/tangci.htm﹚


Random samples from internet

吹縐一池春水(random samples from Internet﹚

  • 東元聲寶合併 吹縐一池春水. 中時電子報 03:59

  • 免費下載音樂軟體是否侵犯智財權, NAPSTER吹縐一池春水, 受質疑.

  • 她愛笑,笑得很野,有時不經意的把眉輕鎖,落在河表哥心中,就如吹縐一池春水 (source)

Traces of other usages


Derrida outline

Derrida: Outline

-- Jacque Derrida:

1. Prologue: Instability of Meaning (discussed)

2. Writing as Différance

3. ‘Center’ as Transcendental Signified and Binarism

4. Deconstruction: Literary Practice


Language in movement 1 spacing

Language in movement (1) “Spacing”

  • Movement from one Signifier to another

    -- Meaning changed when the context is further revealed.

  • Comic effects in standup comedians’ show 相聲: old traces vs. newly defined meanings. (e.g. 政府官員,很持久)

  • The traces of the old meanings are both present and absent.


Writing and diff rance

Writing and Différance

Language a system of difference  of Différance.

* While structualists had treated binary oppositions as stable terms in a formal structure, Derrida sees them as organized in unstable disequilibrium. because of the presence/absence of traces

* Derrida sees the signified’s also in a relation of difference, and they are turned into signifiers floating signifiers.

(Textbook: chap 6: p. 123; 28)


Writing and diff rance 2

Writing and Différance (2)

Différance:

  • To differ;

    A sign is defined by its binary opposition to another sign.

    2. To defer.

    The signifier (black) that is distinguished from the other one (white) is not completely erased; it is only deferred, bracketed or merely “put under erasure.”It can subvert the fixed meaning of the sign.


Writing and diff rance1

Writing and Différance

The chain of signification:

(1) symbolization or mythologizing


Writing and diff rance chain of signification 1

Manifest Destiny

White Man’s Burden

God

Writing and Différance: chain of signification (1)

  • Signifier Signified 2 Signified 3

Asian People

Yellow

Exotic (Evil or Weak)

Other Racial Features

What they did

Other Skin colors

Innocent, Strong

and Civilized

White

White Americans

The other Americans


Writing and diff rance chain of signification 2

Writing and Différance: Chain of Signification (2)

Re-contextualization; traces kept. e.g.

1. Pharmakon: 1). poison, 2). Pharmacy

2. 〈幌馬車之歌〉;吹皺一池春水


Questions

Questions

  • Do you agree that meaning is always uncertain and slippery? What does Derrida’s views of language shed light on our communication?

  • What is wrong with binarism(either . . . or), which structuralism sees as basic to our thinking?

  • Why are poststructuralist views of reality radical or de-stablising? Are they then destructive?


The transcendental signified

The Transcendental Signified

  • (Textbook: p. 124) transcendental signified: source of meaning and center of existence; foundations; the external point of reference, whose definition should not be changed, should not be relational.

  • The “unmoved mover” e.g.

    God (transcendental signified)

    The Bible (transcendental signifier)


The transcendental signified and binaries

The Transcendental Signified and Binaries

They are the upper terms in hierarchical binaries: e.g.


Critique of metaphysics logocentrism phallogocentrism

Critique of Metaphysics: logocentrism, & phallogocentrism

  • Traditional binaries are hierarchical. Should be reversed or questioned.

  • Logocentrism: Logo as center, source, or founding presence of knowledge and human beings.

  • Phallogocentrism: the hierarchy of Man/Woman= sun/moon, reason/emotion, Subject/Object, etc.


Ways of questioning the hierarchical binaries

Ways of Questioning the Hierarchical Binaries

  • The two termsare actually mutually determinant. e.g. The West has to define itself by having/rejecting an “Other” which is different.

    2. The weak term is not really weak.

    3. Mutually implicated: One term implies its opposite term.


Deconstruction practices

Deconstruction: practices

  • Open texts  A text that deconstructs its own unity or “author.” (contemporary self-reflexive texts)

  • Reverse the text’s binaries or expose its undecidability or multiple meanings

  • Study the process of signification of a sign or a text and find out what it tries to erase. (e.g. Scarlet Letter; Barthesian studies of commercials)


Deconstruction practices 2

Deconstruction: practices (2)

4. Find where the text differs from itself. (critical difference) ambiguity and undecidability

5. Radical contextualization  to find out its intertextual references and thus undecidability of meanings.


Deconstruction example 1 process of signification

Deconstruction: example (1)process of signification

  • Wordsworth’s poems:

    “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”;

  • I = cloud ([Dorothy]) + daffodils dancing ([daffodils weary])

  • Daffodils = milky way ([real flowers])  I saw

  • Daffodils in glee ([the waves])  I recollect them in my mind’s eye =bliss of solitude ([the actual experience]).


Deconstruction of binary opposition example 2

Deconstruction of Binary Opposition: Example (2)

“Ode on Melancholy”

Binaries:

  • No to active pursuits of sleep or suicide ( drowns the soul, turns it passive);

  • Savor the contraries and transience in life;

  • 1. “She” (active) dominates where all the senses are quickened; you 

    He ‘burst’ joy’s grape against his palate; ‘hung’ as one of his trophies (passive)

    When senses are active, the poet seems powerless and passive.


From structuralism to post structuralism deconstruction

A Refusal to Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London

Never until the mankind makingBird beast and flowerFathering and all humbling darknessTells with silence the last light breakingAnd the still hourIs come of the sea tumbling in harnessAnd I must enter again the roundZion of the water beadAnd the synagogue of the ear of cornShall I let pray the shadow of a soundOr sow my salt seedIn the least valley of sackcloth to mourn


From structuralism to post structuralism deconstruction

The majesty and burning of the child's death.I shall not murderThe mankind of her going with a grave truthNor blaspheme down the stations of the breathWith any furtherElegy of innocence and youth.Deep with the first dead lies London's daughter,Robed in the long friends,The grains beyond age, the dark veins of her mother,Secret by the unmourning waterOf the riding Thames.After the first death, there is no other.


Undecidability example 3

Undecidability: example 3

  • “Refusal To Mourn The Death, By Fire, Of A Child In London”(Beginning app 2)

  • Verbal -- paradoxes;

  • Textual – no fixed context in this poem;

  • Linguistic (contextual) – against‘a grave truth’ (or all the received (cliché) ways of mourning) but then the poem still uses its rhetoric


Undecidability example 4

Undecidability: example 4

A slumber did my spirit seal;

I had no human fears:

She seemed a thing that could not feel

The touch of earthly years.

<Gap>

No motion has she now, no force;

She neither hears nor sees;

Rolled round in earth's diurnal course,

With rocks, and stones, and trees.

(William Wordsworth )


Undecidability example 41

Undecidability: example 4

“A slumber did my spirit seal” -- Contradictions between

past

life

the human

fear

present

death

the cosmic

peacefulness and regularity

Gap: What happened in between the present and the past?

Whose peacefulness is it? Whose death and when?


Derridian deconstruction in context

Derridian Deconstruction in Context

1. Anti-Foundationalist & de-centering;

2. Like New Critics, deconstructionists read closely to find out the contradictions and gaps in a text, but without reconstructing them back to a unity.

3. Other usages of “différance”: desired object in unattainable, constantly deferred and replaced; colonial mimicry disseminate/de-center colonial authority.

4. “différance” and temporary closure.


Self conscious texts in contemporary popular culture

Self-Conscious Texts in Contemporary Popular Culture

  • Challenge the author e.g. Icicle Thief; Truman Show;

  • Exposing the (TV) frames: “Money for Nothing” (Dire Strait); Ferris Beuler’s Day Off (1, 2); MTV channel’s commercials (parodies)

  • Reality and illusion: Vanilla Sky, Mulholland Drive

  • Parody: Moulin Rouge, 全民亂講


Works cited

Works Cited

  • [textbook] Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. 2nd Ed. Bressler, Charles E. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999.

  • Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Peter Barry.


  • Login