1 / 16

Reframing Organizations , 3 rd ed.

Reframing Organizations , 3 rd ed. Chapter 3. Getting Organized. Getting Organized. Structural assumptions Origins of the structural perspective Structural forms and functions Basic structural tensions Vertical coordination Authority Rules and policies Planning and control systems.

zulema
Download Presentation

Reframing Organizations , 3 rd ed.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reframing Organizations, 3rd ed.

  2. Chapter 3 Getting Organized

  3. Getting Organized • Structural assumptions • Origins of the structural perspective • Structural forms and functions • Basic structural tensions • Vertical coordination • Authority • Rules and policies • Planning and control systems

  4. Getting Organized (II) • Lateral coordination • Meetings • Task forces • Coordinating roles • Matrix structures • Networks • Strengths and weaknesses of lateral strategies

  5. Origins of the Structural Perspective • Frederick Taylor—“scientific management” • Efficiency, time and motion studies, etc. • Max Weber— “monocratic bureaucracy” • Fixed division of labor • Hierarchy of offices • Performance rules • Separate personal and official property and rights • Personnel selected for technical qualifications • Employment as primary occupation

  6. Structural Forms and Functions • Blueprint for expectations and exchanges among internal and external players • Internal – executives, managers, & employees • External – customers & clients • Design options are almost infinite • Design needs to fit circumstances • Structure can both enhance and constrain organizations

  7. Structural Assumptions • Organizations exist to achieve established goals and objectives. • Specialization and division of labor increase efficiency and performance. • Appropriate forms of coordination and control are essential. • Organizations work best when rationality prevails over personal preferences. • Structure must align with circumstances. • Problems arise from structural deficiencies.

  8. Basic Structural Tensions • Differentiation: dividing work, division of labor • Integration: coordinating efforts of different roles and units • Suboptimization:

  9. Basic Structural Tensions • Differentiation: dividing work, division of labor • There are virtues of job specialization • Job descriptions, procedures, and rules guide behavior

  10. Basic Structural Tensions • Integration: coordinating efforts of different roles and units • Functional Groups based on knowledge or skill (ex. University's academic department) • Units created on the basis of time (ex. Day shift, evening shift, etc…) • Groups organized by product (ex. Detergent vs. bar soap) • Groups established around customers (ex. Dell Computer: Home computers, Business computers) • Grouping around place or geography

  11. Basic Structural Tensions • Suboptimization: • Units focus on local concerns, lose sight of big picture • Efforts can become fragmented and overall organizational performance suffers. • Successful organizations coordinate efforts to accomplish desired goals • Vertical Coordination • Lateral Coordinatoin

  12. Vertical Coordination • Authority (the boss makes the decision) • The most ubiquitous method of linking efforts of individuals, units, or divisions • Formally charged with keeping activities aligned with goals • Rules and policies • Limits discretion and help ensue predictability and uniformity (ex. tax bill complaint) • Planning and control systems • Performance control (focus on results) • Imposes outcome objectives w/o specifying how the results are to be achieved • Action planning (focus on process) • Specifies actions to be carried out in a particular way within a specified time frame

  13. Lateral Coordination • Lateral coordination – less formalized and more flexible than authority-bound systems and rules. • Examples • Meetings • Task forces – used when new problems require collaboration of a number of different specialists • Coordinating roles • Matrix structures (cross cutting coordination responsibilities) • Networks • Strengths and weaknesses of lateral strategies • Good for complex tasks performed in turbulent, fast-changing environment.

  14. McDonald’s and Harvard: A Structural Odd Couple • McDonald’s: clearer goals, more centralized, tighter performance controls • Harvard: diffuse goals, highly decentralized, high autonomy for professors • Why have two successful organizations developed such different structures? • Answer: Customer expectations No one expects individual personalities to influence the quality of McDonald’s hamburgers, but everyone expects Harvard course to be unique creation of an individual professor.

  15. Structural Imperatives • Size and age – growth must be matched with corresponding adjustments in roles and relationships (ex. McDonalds) • Core process – structure has to be built around an organizations core process • Environment – uncertainty press organizations to develop new roles to deal with emerging problems (ex. Public schools/budgets) • Strategy and goals – shape structure • Information technology- as uncertainty increases, more information is needed to make decision • People: nature of workforce – many lower-level jobs require high level of skill.

  16. Conclusion • Structural frame—examine social context of work • Differentiation and integration • Structure depends on situation • Simpler, more stable environments  simpler, more hierarchical and centralized structures • Changing, turbulent environments  more complex, flexible structures

More Related