1 / 69

From ABC’s to “Learning to See”: Insights and Outreach from an Experiential Project Course

From ABC’s to “Learning to See”: Insights and Outreach from an Experiential Project Course. Keith A. Willoughby Edwards School of Business University of Saskatchewan. A bit about me. Associate Professor in Operations Management, Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan

zulema
Download Presentation

From ABC’s to “Learning to See”: Insights and Outreach from an Experiential Project Course

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. From ABC’s to “Learning to See”: Insights and Outreach from an Experiential Project Course Keith A. Willoughby Edwards School of Business University of Saskatchewan

  2. A bit about me • Associate Professor in Operations Management, Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan • Associate Dean – Academic • Research interests: • Lean/ Six Sigma process improvement methods • Health care analysis

  3. Now to get us started • If the following are important: • Data-driven decision making • Exploring situations from all sides • “Learning to see” how problems can be solved

  4. Then how about… • A pop quiz!

  5. Unpacking your responses • For those of you who chose “F”, why did you make that selection? • For those of you who chose “D”, why did you make that selection?

  6. This is based on a real story • Rewind back to the days of World War II (1939-1945) • Fighter planes engaged in combat missions

  7. Patrick Blackett • British physicist • Director of Operational Research with the British Admiralty, 1942-1945

  8. Fighter plane damage • Analysts noted all damage inflicted by enemy planes • Gave the recommendation that armour be added in the most heavily damaged areas

  9. Another suggestion • Some of the crew in an aircraft should be removed, so that fighter plane loss would result in losing fewer personnel • This was rejected by the Royal Air Force commanders

  10. What did Blackett propose? • Presented the seemingly counter-intuitive recommendation for the armour-plating of aircraft • Armour should be placed in the areas which were completely untouched by damage in the bombers which returned • Why would he make this recommendation?

  11. Results • The number of lost fighter planes decreased • Provides a striking example of exploring problems from various perspectives

  12. Undergrad class - 2008

  13. Undergrad class - 2009

  14. Workshop overview • 1. Background details • 2. Course specifics • 3. Course management

  15. Workshop overview • 4. What will I do differently next time? • 5. Why am I eager to deliver this course again?

  16. Saskatoon, SK ~13,414 km’s to Nairobi

  17. Edwards School of Business

  18. Particulars • 1,800 undergraduate business students • 6 majors • ~65 faculty (FTE)

  19. Environmental factors contributing to this course • 1. Success of business cooperative education program • 8 month work assignments • All business majors involved (about 50 students per year) • 100% employment upon graduation

  20. Environmental factors • 2. Growing awareness of community service/ project-based learning in our curriculum: • Management consulting class • International business team projects • Strategic marketing plans

  21. Environmental factors • 3. Relatively low number of OR/OM majors • Selfishly, we wanted some way of raising the profile of our discipline

  22. Workshop title • From ABC’s to “Learning to See” • Recognized that all of our students took one core operations course • 2nd year of their program

  23. But after that… • Only a handful enrolled in our elective courses • We wanted to get them from their ABC’s (basic OR material) to “Learning to See” • Cultivate a sense that OR methods apply to real process analysis and improvement problems

  24. The ABC’s • This was also my set of ABC’s, since it was the first time I’d ever offered such a course • I’ve just begun my journey in this course, but hopefully my material can interest others in pursuing such an option

  25. “Learning to See” • This title borrows from a series of training materials produced by the Lean Enterprise Institute

  26. Course specifics • 13-week semester (January to April) • Class met twice each week for 80 minutes per “session”

  27. Main course objective • To provide students with experience in applying OR principles and tools to the analysis of actual (and non-trivial) problems facing real organizations

  28. Course deliverable • Student groups would undertake a real project with a real client • The major deliverables were a written project report and oral presentation • No midterms or final exams!

  29. Should clients pay? • Our current approach is to provide these projects free of charge • This may change as the course matures and we hone our collective skills

  30. Grading breakdown • Participation: 10% • Project charter: 5% • Interim project reports: 10% • Final project report: 45% • Project presentation: 20% • Lessons learned report : 10%

  31. Class size • What is an appropriate enrolment? • This is driven by how many individuals are assigned per student team

  32. Class size • If the groups are small (e.g., 2 people), then the instructor needs to “manage” several client projects • If the groups are large (e.g., 5-6), some students may freeload on the contributions of others

  33. Our experience • We targeted an enrollment of 15-25 students • 2011 class featured 18 students • Permitted 5 groups of 3-4 students each

  34. Enrolment specifics • 12 male, 6 female • Majors: • Management: 6 • OM: 5 • Finance: 3 • Marketing: 3 • Human resources: 1

  35. Client selection • How do you get clients to agree to participate? • Admittedly, the “pro bono” nature of the course helped!

  36. What is a perfect project? • Non-trivial and challenging but feasible within a 13-week time frame • We didn’t want “low-hanging fruit” • Meaningful to the client, motivating to the student group

  37. The perfect project • Utilizes different OR approaches: • Analytical (spreadsheet) modeling • Lean/ process improvement

  38. How did we obtain clients? • Personal contacts in the industry • Approach our colleagues’ contacts (even those from other disciplines) • My sense is that our “first run” was rockier than it will be in the future

  39. Course management • Assigning students to teams • Student-selection or professor-selection?

  40. Professor-selection! • I deliberately balanced the teams for gender, business major, year in program, etc. • Concern with student-selection is that friends organize with other friends

  41. Course management • Class periods involved: • Discussions about setting appropriate milestones, group dynamics, various OR/OM methods • Guest speakers

  42. Project industries • Health care – 3 • Supply chain management – 1 • Community service – 1 • The following slides provide an OR flavor of the various projects

  43. Project #1: Health region patient flow • Ambulatory care • Orthopedics patients • Two hospitals in Saskatoon

  44. Background • Underutilization in capacity in some areas, while other areas are being strained to the limit • Congestion in patient flow could lead to increased waiting and throughput time, as well as decreased staff and patient satisfaction

  45. Project #2: Cameco transit warehouse • Cameco is one of the world’s largest uranium companies

  46. Background • Cameco operates a “Transit Warehouse” in Saskatoon • Cross-docking facility

  47. Cameco mines in northern SK Hundreds of vendors Transit warehouse

  48. Background • Unfortunately, the paper-copy packaging slips that Cameco receives from its individual vendors are tremendously non-uniform (size, style, etc.). • The processes involved with organizing these slips are far from satisfactory

  49. Background • In the event of an error on a packaging slip, finding the specific slip is a fairly time-consuming and tedious process • How could Cameco better organize its packaging slips? Would digitization help the process? What are the best practices from industry?

  50. Project #3: Facility location • Determining the location of Home Care offices throughout Saskatoon • Saskatoon Health Region

More Related