90 likes | 222 Views
MTDB Quality Measures. Scott Fifield Chief, Geographic Process and Quality Management Branch Quality, Assessments, and Evaluations Work Group Chair. Spatial Update Quality. Every edge in the MTDB has a Means ID (MID) based on authority, task, and source
E N D
MTDB Quality Measures Scott Fifield Chief, Geographic Process and Quality Management Branch Quality, Assessments, and Evaluations Work Group Chair
Spatial Update Quality • Every edge in the MTDB has a Means ID (MID) based on authority, task, and source • MIDs are a compact way to track a number of metadata records and attributes • The Spatial Census Quality Value (CQV) ranks the feature type-specific quality of a source (via a formula)
Spatial Update Quality • Circular Error 95% (CE95) – we calculate CE95 for a source based on a sample of points – 95% fall within 7.6m of the GPS control points • Only sources that meet the minimum standards are used for update
Ongoing Quality Checks • Business Rules run at time of update • Business Rules run as a batch each morning • MT Edits run periodically to check relationships between fields and legal values • Institutionalize the stand-alone edit checks – find errors as early in the process as we can
Quality Checks at Benchmarking • We benchmark the MTDB twice each year • After all updates in a county complete, the county is locked and a series of edits run • We restrict these edits to the data needed for this cycle of products
Sequence of Pre-Benchmark Edits • Validate Topology • Business Rules and Legal Values • Validate Geometry • Geographic Area Validation and Reconciliation
The Next Stage • Define quality – “fitness for use” (Juran, 1951) or the “degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfills (customer) needs or expectations” • Recommendation written to develop spatial and geographic area quality indicators • Store quality data on the primitive level (edge, elemental feature) where appropriate
The Next Stage • QIs include: Spatial Accuracy, Coverage, Name/Attribute Completeness/Accuracy • Standard reporting unit will be tract – what is the quality for the various indicators • Ingest all quality data into the Confidence Analysis and Tracking Tool (CATT) • By tract – where do we have confidence, where do we have deficiencies?
Questions? • scott.p.fifield@census.gov • 301-763-3556