1 / 32

Feature Interaction in Internet Telephony Wissam Itani March 26, 2002

Feature Interaction in Internet Telephony Wissam Itani March 26, 2002. Outline. Feature Interaction Definition Internet Telephony Architectural Model Differences from the PSTN Applicability of Existing FI Work Examples of New Interactions in IT

zofia
Download Presentation

Feature Interaction in Internet Telephony Wissam Itani March 26, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Feature Interaction in Internet Telephony Wissam Itani March 26, 2002

  2. Outline • Feature Interaction Definition • Internet Telephony Architectural Model • Differences from the PSTN • Applicability of Existing FI Work • Examples of New Interactions in IT • New Approaches for Managing Internet Interactions • Conclusion

  3. Feature Interaction Definition • Feature interactions refer to situations in which instances of the same features or different service features affect each other. • Bad feature interaction (FI) is one that causes the system behavior to be undesirable. • Good FI

  4. Internet Telephony Architectural Model • Within Internet telephony network, we find 3 types of devices : • end sytems • gateways • signaling servers

  5. Internet Telephony Architectural Model(Cont.) • End sytems : devices on which users place and receive calls. • Initiate and respond to signaling • Transmit and receive media • Smart : aware of call state • Call waiting, Multiple Line services ...

  6. Internet Telephony Architectural Model(Cont.) • Gateways : devices which allow calls to be placed to and from other telephone networks. • Other devices see Gateways as end devices. • Networks behind Gateways are transparent to other devices.

  7. Internet Telephony Architectural Model(Cont.) • Signaling servers : handle the application-level control of the routing of signaling messages • perform user location services

  8. Differences from the PSTN • These differences affect what sorts of features are possible, how these features are created, and how their interactions are managed. • Internet telephony allows more flexibility and new possibilities, it also introduces new challenges.

  9. Advantages of Internet Telephony • Advantages can be divided into 3 categories: • Protocol • Network • Conceptual

  10. Protocol Issues • Internet telephony signaling protocols are more expressive • Internet telephony signaling can be extended while maintaining compatibility. The network would be able to support advanced features without undergoing universal upgrades of an entire system.

  11. Protocol Issues (Cont.) • Adding another control protocol, for example, RTSP for voice mail, can be done independently of the telephony signaling protocol • Internet telephony does not make a strong distinction between user devices and network devices. • Internet model eliminates user-level address scarcity.

  12. Network Issues • Internet telephony takes advantage of the nature of the Internet network itself • The Internet is inherently self-routing. Both signaling and media are sent off into the network through the same mechanism

  13. Network Issues (Cont.) • The Internet environment supports a number of means of strong encryption and authentication, such as the IPsec suite of protocols.

  14. Conceptual Issues • The conceptual framework of Internet services add new characteristics to Internet telephony environment. • Internet is already a distributed environment where multiple providers interwork and compete. • A customer can proxy all his calls through a service which, for example, automatically blocks calls from known telemarketers.

  15. Conceptual Issues(Cont.) • The Internet environment enables programmability on a scale not seen in the telephone network. • Service providers motivated to create services which will distinguish them from competitors

  16. New Complications • While the new characteristics of the Internet enable new possibilities, they also increase the complexity of creating features. • Distributed nature of the Internet: Features can be implemented and deployed at network devices, end systems, and signaling servers.

  17. New Complications (Cont.) • User programmability is now possible : features could be created by amateur feature designers. • End systems have control of call state. 911 calls. • Several new features of Internet telephony protocols also have the potential for dramatic FI consequences with existing protocols.

  18. New Complications (Cont.) • Forking proxy : call request transmitted to several devices. • Request expiration. User wishes may conflict with signaling servers responses. • Internet’s lack of address scarcity. With throw-away addresses now available one can easily evade a block on her addresses.

  19. New Complications (Cont.) • Assumptions, based on the trust model in the PSTN, break down when end-to-end connectivity is introduced and anybody can become an Internet Service Provider. • Feature like ‘caller I-D blocking’ become much more difficult when users cannot trust the network not to reveal calling information to recipients.

  20. Applicability of Existing FI Work • Single-component interactions are largely the same in the Internet environment as they are in the PSTN. The techniques developed to resolve these interactions should still be valid in the new environment.

  21. Applicability of Existing FI Work (Cont.) • Multiple-component interactions, are much more complicated for Internet telephony. Features are designed and deployed by providers who do not cooperate. FI resolution techniques, depending on features designed globally and resolving their interactions at design time, are no longer practically applicable.

  22. Examples of New Interactions in Internet Telephony • FI in Internet telephony may be categorized into 2 types of interactions: • Cooperative : correspond with (SUMC) interactions. • Adversarial : correspond with (MUMC) or (CUSY) interactions.

  23. Cooperative Interactions (Example 1) • Request Forking (RF) and Call Forward to Voicemail : an RF allows a proxy server P to attempt to locate a user by forwarding a request to multiple destinations, A and B. The call will be connected to the first destination to pick up. The interaction arises when the callee is currently located at A, and B has had its calls forwarded to a voicemail system.

  24. Request Forking cse.pu.edu Location Server Proxy Server bob run.cse.psu.edu jump.cse.psu.edu alice CALL bob@cse.psu.edu run INVITE bob@run INVITE bob@jump 200 OK jump bob@jump Figure from : Henning Schulzrinne, Industrial-Strength Internet Telephony

  25. Cooperative Interactions (Example 2) • Camp-on (CO) and Call Forward on Busy: CO allows a caller to re-try calling a busy destination periodically until the line becomes free. • If the destination has Call Forward on Busy, the call is forwarded to some alternate destination; in this case CO can’t be triggered • this interaction can occur in the PSTN but it is more serious in Internet telephony.

  26. Adversarial Interactions (Example 1) • Outgoing Call Screening and Call Forwarding: this interaction also appears in the PSTN, of course, but the ability to easily change addresses and get easy call forwarding on the Internet makes this problem much more significant in the Internet environment.

  27. Adversarial Interactions (Example 2) • Outgoing Call Screening (OCS) and End-to-End connectivity : a signaling server cannot force calls to be placed through it because any device can talk to any other, and an end system can communicate directly with the remote party, bypassing local administrative controls entirely. • Enforcement of OCS policy is difficult

  28. New Approaches for Managing Internet Interactions • Explicitness: some interactions can be prevented or made less likely by making explicit the actions being taken, and their desired effects. For instance, a call wishing to camp on to the actual user to be contacted could specify “do not forward” so as to get back a busy response rather than have the call be forwarded against their wishes.

  29. New Approaches for Managing Internet Interactions (Cont.) • Universal authentication: many of the problems introduced by polymorphic identities and identity forging can be resolved by insisting on strong authentication of request.

  30. New Approaches for Managing Internet Interactions (Cont.) • Network-level administrative restrictions: such as firewalls must be used to limit end-to-end connectivity in order to impose administrative controls. • Verification testing: ensuring correct operation of features by testing them directly.

  31. Conclusion • Learn from prior experiences of creation of telephony services • Some existing FI management techniques are impractical in IT • DFC, Agent’s negotiation, transaction processing, Service layer

  32. References • [1] J. Lennox and H. Schulzrinne, “Feature Interaction in Internet Telephony” in proc. of Feature Interaction in Telecommunications and Software Systems VI, Glasgow, United Kingdom, May 2000. • [2] H. Schulzrinne, “The IETF Internet Telephony Architecture and Protocols” IEEE Network, pp. 18-23, May/June 1999. • [3] D. Zhang "The Deployment of Features in Internet Telephony" http://lotos.csi.uottawa.ca/ftp/pub/Lotos/Theses, Msc Thesis Carleton University, January 2002. • [4] L. Blair and J. Pang, “Feature Interactions-Life Beyond Traditional Telephony” Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VI., IOS Press, pp. 83-93, Amsterdam, 2000 • [5] J. Cameron , “Feature Interaction in the New World” Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems V, IOS Press, pp. 3-9, 1998 • [6] K. Kimbler, “Service Interaction in Next Generation Networks” Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VI, IOS Press, pp. 14-20, 2000

More Related