1 / 18

Approaches to baseline setting and MRV under the CDM

Approaches to baseline setting and MRV under the CDM. Urban Methodologies for the Built Environment Workshop Bonn, Germany. Outline. Overview of methodologies in buildings Methodological approaches Suppressed demand Concluding remarks. CDM methodologies in building energy efficiency.

zoe-diaz
Download Presentation

Approaches to baseline setting and MRV under the CDM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Approaches to baseline setting and MRV under the CDM Urban Methodologies for the Built Environment Workshop Bonn, Germany

  2. Outline • Overview of methodologies in buildings • Methodological approaches • Suppressed demand • Concluding remarks

  3. CDM methodologies in building energy efficiency

  4. Methodological approaches: baseline setting & MRV • Scale • Large scale • Small scale • Scope • Individual end-uses • Whole building • Methodological approaches • Survey • Benchmarking • Modeling • Standardized default parameters

  5. Methodological approaches: baseline setting and MRV • Survey • Benchmarking • Modeling • Standardized default parameters

  6. Survey and benchmarking Similar buildings: • Located in the same municipality, state, province, county • Built & occupied within 5 years • Located in region with annual HDD/CDD in range 80% -120% • Similar socio-economic conditions • Income level, property prices/m2 (min. 3 socio-economic classes) • Comparable size (GFA +/- 50%) • Occupancy • Year-round residence – residential buildings • Operated on annual average min. 30hrs/week – commercial & public buildings

  7. Survey and benchmarking Survey: • Sample size: statistically representative • Baseline: average performance Benchmarking: • Sample size: 20 buildings • Baseline: top 20% best performing buildings Emission reductions: • monitored difference between baseline & project buildings

  8. Modeling Modeling requirements: • Validation: • IEA’s BESTEST protocol (Building Energy Simulation Test) • Calibration: • actual energy consumption of project buildings • first full year of project building operation • Documentation: software, input files (building & system characteristics, loads & operating schedules, weather data, etc.) • Simulation and calibration: • Skilled operator: min. 3 years of relevant experience, professional education and/or training

  9. Modeling Baseline model: baseline energy consumption of buildings • Characteristics of baseline buildings • New: (1) sample 20 bldngs, top 20% best performing bldngs (2) interview with 5 construction companies/experts => building characteristics • Retrofit: pre-retrofit characteristics • Occupancy, control strategies, weather data - project buildings Project model: project building characteristics, actual consumption, occupancy, control strategies, weather data Emission reductions: modeled electrical & thermal energy savings multiplied by appropriate EFs

  10. Standardized default parameters CFL lighting: • 3.5 hours - default operating hours Battery charged LED/ LED lighting: • 2 years – default lamp effective use life • 7 years - default lamp effective use life with quality proof • 0.092/tCO2 – default lamp emission factor for baseline Super efficient refrigerators • Deemed savings: • Baseline benchmark: energy consumption of A class refrigerator in the EU market • Project annual electricity consumption: manufacturer

  11. Suppressed demand - min energy service to meet basic human needs Deemed to exist: • Rural areas in country with electrification rate below 20% • Animal dung – the most common fuel used in project area • LDCs & SIDs • Special Underdeveloped Zone* in a developing country • Zone, municipality, other administrative unit • More than 50% of population with income less than 2 USD/day (PPP) • GNI/capita in country is less than 3,000 USD & the population in the zone is among the 20% poorest in the poverty ranking in the country * “Guidelines for demonstrating additionality of microscale project activities”

  12. Energypoverty in low-income residential buildings Source: OECD/IEA (2011)

  13. Suppressed demand: standardized default parameters Rural electrification using renewable energy: • > 55k Wh of RES: 6.8tCO2/MWh • 55-250 kWh of RES: 1.3 tCO2/MWh • <250 kWh of RES: 1.0 tCO2/MWh

  14. Suppressed demand: whole building based on survey Suppressed demand factor 1.20 => multiply baseline energy of targeted end-use (heating, cooking and/or electricity) • Sample size: 20 buildings • Located in the same municipality, built & occupied within 5 year • Located in region with annual HDD/CDD in range 80% -120% • Similar socio-economic conditions (Income level, property prices/m2) • Comparable size (GFA range from 50% to 150%) • Occupancy • Year-round residence – residential buildings • Operated on annual average min. 30hrs/week – commercial & public buildings

  15. Suppressed demand: whole building using modeling Run model: 2 times generate baseline energy in each year of crediting period • Baseline building characteristics • T-settings & weather experienced by project buildings Run 1: Temperature settings • Specified in relevant building code • Healthy indoor temperatures recommended by WHO Run 2: Temperature settings • Project model observed in project building Baseline energy = MIN [Run 1; Run 2]

  16. Concluding remarks CDM- well-tested tool box for MRV-ing emissions from buildings • Methodological approaches tailored to user needs • Individual end-uses • Whole building • Tested via application in a variety of context in developing countries • Reduced transaction costs for MRV • Targeting individual end uses • Using models and benchmarks • Providing utilization defaults • Provide methods to address specific needs of LDCs, SIDs, African countries and Underdeveloped Zones in developing countries • Continuously evolves and becomes more usable taking into account experience gained from application and international knowledge

  17. Thank you for your attention!

  18. Building codes K .Janda 2009

More Related