Rogerian Argument

1. Rogerian Argument Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers

2. Based on Carl Rogers’ theory that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they fully and fairly state the other person’s position. Origins of this principle

3. 1. Introduction 2. Contexts 3. Writer’s position 4. Benefits to opponent 4 Parts of the Rogerian Argument

4. 1. Introduction “Let’s meet in the middle.” The writer describes an issue well enough to show that he/she fully understands and respects the alternative position.

5. 2. Contexts “You may be right sometimes…” The writer describes cases/contexts in which the alternative position may be legitimate.

6. 3. Writer’sPosition “This is why my position is right.” The writer states her/his position and presents circumstances in which it is valid. This is where the writer supports her/his views with evidence.

7. 4. Benefits to Opponent “See what you might gain by agreeing with me?” The writer explains to the opponent how he/she would benefit from adopting the writer’s position.

8. Rogerian arguments steer clear of incendiary and stereotypical language. • They emphasize how both sides of the argument might benefit by working together. • They advocate a win-win outcome. Summation