1 / 24

FIVE CREEKS RANGELAND RESTORATION PROJECT

FIVE CREEKS RANGELAND RESTORATION PROJECT. FALL 2008 Burns District, BLM. FIVE CREEKS. Points to Cover Where is 5 Creeks? When did implementation begin? Who is involved in the project? How is the project being implemented? Why 5 Creeks?. Project Location.

ziva
Download Presentation

FIVE CREEKS RANGELAND RESTORATION PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FIVE CREEKS RANGELAND RESTORATION PROJECT FALL 2008 Burns District, BLM

  2. FIVE CREEKS • Points to Cover • Where is 5 Creeks? • When did implementation begin? • Who is involved in the project? • How is the project being implemented? • Why 5 Creeks?

  3. Project Location Project Area: 73,386 Acres (53,738 public & 19,648 private) Elevation: 4200 – 7000 ft Implementation Period:7-10 years

  4. FIVE CREEKS • North End of Steens Mountain • Three Rives Resource Area • Cooperative Management and Protection Area (NLCS)

  5. Project Characteristics • Landscape Level Treatments • Restoration of rangelands encroached by western juniper • Multi-year commitment • Projects included adjacent private lands • Helped to reduce cost • Assisted private land owners in meeting land management objectives • Projects coordinated with interested other agencies and groups • ODFW • Soil and Water Conservation District • Harney County Watershed Council • USFWS

  6. Healthy Lands Initiative Five Creeks Rangeland Restoration Managing natural resources for multiple use with flexible, landscape-levelapproaches. A landscape level project treating across boundaries on public and private land Restoring sagebrush and riparian habitat tohealthy & productiveconditions. Restore and maintainhealthy landscapes Characterized bybroad scaleand accelerated pace Treat 73,386 acres over a 8-10 year time frame. Partnerships are integral Partnerships are integral

  7. Timeline 6 Phases Unit 1 (South) 6,151 acres 5, 650 acres BLM & 500 acres Private Land • 2007/Summer– Project Layout, Clearances • 2008– Grazing Rest • 2008/Fall – Broadcast Burn • 2008/Fall – Cut Creeks • 2009– Grazing Rest • 2009/Winter/Spring – Jackpot Burn Creeks • 2010 – Grazing Rest Public and Private Treated Simultaneously

  8. Timeline 2007 - 2011 6 Phases Unit 2 15,556 acres 9,000 acres BLM & 6,580 acres Private Land

  9. Timeline 2008 - 2012 Six Implementation Phases Unit 3 12,270 acres 9,200 acres BLM & 3,060 acres Private Land

  10. Timeline Six Implementation Phases

  11. FIVE CREEKS • Who’s Involved? • Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board • Harney County Watershed Council • Harney County Soil and Water Conservation District • Roaring Springs Ranch • Otley Bros, Inc • Mann Lake Ranch • Steens Mountain Ranch • Riddle Ranches, Inc • Riddle/Blitzen Working Group • Steens Mountain Advisory Council • Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Station –USDA/Agricultural Research Service • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife • Harney County Court • Great Basin Restoration Initiative

  12. FIVE CREEKS • What’s being Done • Reduce the cover and density of western juniper across the project area • Mountain Big Sagebrush • Quaking Aspen • Riparian Areas • Bitterbrush • Mountain Mahogany • Improve forage production • Livestock • Rocky Mountain Elk • Mule Deer • Wild Horses • Pronghorn • Reduce Accumulation of hazardous fuels • Natural • Activity

  13. FIVE CREEKS • How Is the Project being Implemented? • Number of treatments are being utilized to achieve the project objectives • Cutting • Complete Cuts • Partial Cuts • Burning • Broadcast • Jackpot • Seeding

  14. FIVE CREEKS • Juniper Cutting • Units layout based on type of cutting • Full Cuts • Partial Cuts

  15. FIVE CREEKS • Prescribed Fire • Jackpot Burning • Broadcast Burning

  16. FIVE CREEKS • Complexity – High • Original Analysis Indicated Moderate • Large Contingency Area • Several Opportunities For Control • Changed to High • Adjacent Landowners Not Participating • Large Amounts of Black-lining • Aviation

  17. FIVE CREEKS

  18. FIVE CREEKS • Developing the Rx • Historic Weather for Time of Year • Blended Fuel Model to Predict Fire Behavior • Flame Length Below Ability to Control Based on Cut Juniper

  19. FIVE CREEKS • Resources Required • RXB1 • RXFB • CREW • 2 STL/TFL • 3 Type 4 ENG • 3 Type 6 ENG • 2 TATRA/Tenders (used 4) • 2 ATVs w/ Bean Sprayers • 4 UTVs w/ Tanks and Pumps • Resource Advisor on site Need Neighbors Help

  20. FIVE CREEKS • Camped on Site • Reduced Travel Time • Increased Crew Safety • Feed Crews • Toilets • Shuttle Supplies

  21. FIVE CREEKS • Jackpot Burning • Blacklining • Unit Ignition • Drip Torches • ATV Torches • Helitorch • Holding

  22. FIVE CREEKS • Post Fire Management • Livestock Grazing – Two growing season in burned area • Weeds Management – • Inventories • Spot treatments • Monitoring

  23. FIVE CREEKS • Success? • Implementation • Plant Community Response • Animal Response

  24. FIVE CREEKS • Previous Projects • Cutting and burning results in greatest reductions in juniper • Post-fire vegetation response • Plant cover increases 2-3x • Quaking Aspen Suckering Increases • Bitterbrush Seedling Establishment – Variable • Weeds • Jackpot Burning too late in spring results in thistle increase

More Related