1 / 23

PCORI and Other Funding Sources

PCORI and Other Funding Sources. K Scholars Program * April 2013 Michael Steinman, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics Director of Comparative Effectiveness Research, CTSI. Disclosure. No conflicts of interest. Outline. What is PCORI?

Download Presentation

PCORI and Other Funding Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PCORI and Other Funding Sources K Scholars Program * April 2013 Michael Steinman, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics Director of Comparative Effectiveness Research, CTSI

  2. Disclosure • No conflicts of interest

  3. Outline • What is PCORI? • And what is its relation to CER? • Funding opportunities through PCORI • Other funding opportunities in CER and PCOR

  4. PCORI • 2010 health reform created Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute • CER politically unpalatable (“lead to rationing”) • So…focus on PCOR • Quasi-governmental organization funded by tax on insurers • Protected from annual congressional appropriations • Cannot consider cost in coverage decisions; cannot use QALYs; will not fund cost-effectiveness analyses • Otherwise fairly open mandate to create something new

  5. PCORI • Different approach to research • PCOR • Stakeholder engagement • “Community based participatory research for health care systems”

  6. Patient-Centered Outcomes • “Given my personal characteristics, conditions and preferences, what should I expect will happen to me?” • “What are my options and what are the potential benefits and harms of those options?” • “What can I do to improve the outcomes that are most important to me?” • “How can clinicians and the care delivery systems they work in help me make the best decisions about my health and healthcare?”

  7. Patient-Centered Outcomes • Prognosis; comparative options for diagnosis and treatment; improved communication and decision-making • Outcomes that directly impact patient’s lives and well-being • Functional status; ability to concentrate; care for loved ones; pain; NOT biomarkers • Effect size should be meaningful • Evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effects • Real-world settings

  8. Stakeholder Engagement • Central to PCORI’s mission • Stakeholders should be involved in ALL aspects of research • Developing research plan, measures, etc. • Patients, providers, policy-makers, etc. • Stakeholders sit on review panels

  9. Guidance • PCORI Methodology Report and Methodology Standards • Explicit guidance on preferred methods http://www.pcori.org/research-we-support/methodology/

  10. PCORI Funding Opportunities • PFAs – investigator initiated projects • Targeted announcements • Special programs

  11. PCORI Funding Announcements (PFAs) • PCORI Funding Announcements • 3 cycles per year • 3 years, up to $500K per year • ~$350 million in 2013 • Five priority areas

  12. First Round of PFAs • 25 proposals funded (out of ~500) • $41 million over 3 years

  13. First Round of PFAs • Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment • Cognitive outcomes of antiepileptic drugs in pediatric epilepsy • Helping patients choose peritoneal dialysis vs. hemodialysis • Healthcare Systems • Hospital discharge planning – impact on medication problems, functional status, re-hospitalization

  14. First Round of PFAs • Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment • Cognitive outcomes of antiepileptic drugs in pediatric epilepsy • Helping patients choose peritoneal dialysis vs. hemodialysis • Healthcare Systems • Hospital discharge planning – impact on medication problems, functional status, re-hospitalization Patient-centered outcomes (Outcomes, heterogeneous effects, real-world)

  15. Targeted Announcements • Five target areas • Treatment options for uterine fibroids. • Treatment options for severe asthma in African-Americans and Hispanics/Latinos. • Preventing injuries from falls in the elderly. • Treatment options for back pain. • Obesity treatment options in diverse populations. • Actual funding announcements will be posted by July 2013 (in theory)

  16. Special Opportunities • PCORI Challenge • Developing a patient/research “matching” system • $50,000 • Others coming down the pike…

  17. Not only PCORI • Alternative funding sources • AHRQ • NIH • VA • Foundations • Can do things that PCORI cannot • Career development • Cost effectiveness • Non-patient centered outcomes

  18. AHRQ • Beginning series of FOAs in PCOR • Mentored Career Development in PCOR • Junior Investigator: K01; K08 • UCSF K12 PARTNERS Program • Mid-career or Senior Investigator: K18 • Infrastructure Development Program in PCOR • R24 http://www.ahrq.gov/funding/research/announcements/index.html http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-HS-13-003.html http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/training/partners

  19. AHRQ • CER is one of seven AHRQ “portfolios” • Intramural and contract-based work in CER • Effective Health Care Program • Evidence-Based Practice Centers • Synthesize evidence for conditions or technologies • CERTs • Research and education drugs and devices • DeCiDE Network • Practical studies on outcomes, CER, safety, appropriateness http://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/portfolios/comparative-effectiveness/index.html

  20. NIH • Lots of funding in 2009-10 under ARRA • Now selected RFAs: • Secondary Analyses of Comparative Effectiveness, Health Outcomes and Costs in Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions (R21; NIA) • Dissemination and Implementation Research • R01; R21; R03 (multiple institutes)

  21. VA • Not much specific to CER and PCOR

  22. Resources • CER Program • http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/research/cer • Consultation resources • 5 free hours of consultation thru consultation services • Links to high value consultation opportunities • Community Engagement & Health Policy • CELDAC • SF Bay Area Collaborative Research Network • Symposium • Updates and Announcements – listserv • Collaboration around RFAs

  23. Questions / Comments ? Mike Steinman Mike.steinman@ucsf.edu http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/research/cer

More Related