1 / 44

NJ SHARES 2006 Evaluation

NJ SHARES 2006 Evaluation. October 26, 2006. Evaluation Goals. Characterize NJ SHARES grant recipients Characterize NJ SHARES grants Examine good faith payments Analyze post grant payment compliance. Evaluation Data. NJ SHARES database 2004 Grants (no demographics) 2005 Grants

zelia
Download Presentation

NJ SHARES 2006 Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NJ SHARES 2006 Evaluation October 26, 2006

  2. Evaluation Goals • Characterize NJ SHARES grant recipients • Characterize NJ SHARES grants • Examine good faith payments • Analyze post grant payment compliance

  3. Evaluation Data • NJ SHARES database • 2004 Grants (no demographics) • 2005 Grants • Q1 2006 Grants • Utility transaction data • 2004 Q1 recipients • 2005 Q1 recipients • 2006 Q1 recipients

  4. Evaluation Data • Utility Data • Atlantic City Electric • Elizabethtown Gas • New Jersey Natural Gas • PSE&G • South Jersey Gas

  5. 2005 Grant Data

  6. 2005/2006 Grant Data

  7. 2005 Grant Data

  8. 2005 Grant Data

  9. 2005 Grant Data

  10. 2005 Grant Data

  11. 2005 Grant Data

  12. 2005 Grant Data

  13. 2005 Grant Data

  14. 2005 Grant Data

  15. 2005 Grant Data

  16. 2005 Grant Data

  17. 2005 Grant Data

  18. 2005 Grant Data

  19. 2005 Grant Data

  20. 2005 Grant Data

  21. 2005 Grant Data

  22. 2005 Grant Data • Detailed “Other” Reasons for Application: • Car trouble and repairs • Estimated meter readings • College expenses • Death in the family leading to loss of income-earner and/or high funeral costs • Unexpected home repairs (ex. roof, hot water heater, pipes) • Change in employment status • No longer covered by disability insurance or no more sick leave • High mortgages, child support, and insurance costs • Change in living situation (high cost of moving, change in marital status, etc.)

  23. 2005 Grant Data

  24. 2005 Grant Data

  25. Utility Data Analysis Methodology • Focused on Q1 2005 Grant Recipients • Transaction Data from Participating Utilities • Files Contain Payments, Charges, Account Balances • Analyzed: • Existence of “Good Faith Payment” • Ratio of Payments Made to Charges Incurred at Key Intervals • Used Q1 2004 and Q1 2006 Recipients as Comparison Groups

  26. Utility Data AnalysisSample Group Definitions

  27. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  28. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  29. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  30. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  31. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  32. Utility Data Analysis Good Faith Payments

  33. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  34. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  35. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  36. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  37. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  38. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  39. Utility Data Analysis: Payment Compliance Results

  40. Utility Data Analysis: Payment Compliance Results

  41. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  42. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  43. Utility Data AnalysisPayment Compliance

  44. Utility Data AnalysisUSF/LIHEAP Receipt

More Related