1 / 9

Mike Woodall Head: Aviation Security Regulation (Projects) Aviation Security Division

Mike Woodall Head: Aviation Security Regulation (Projects) Aviation Security Division Aviation Directorate UK Department For Transport. UK’s Risk Based Approach to ‘Derogations’. Host State Responsibility. Annex 17

zeke
Download Presentation

Mike Woodall Head: Aviation Security Regulation (Projects) Aviation Security Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mike Woodall Head: Aviation Security Regulation (Projects) Aviation Security Division Aviation Directorate UK Department For Transport

  2. UK’s Risk Based Approach to ‘Derogations’

  3. Host State Responsibility • Annex 17 • 2.1.1 – Each contracting State shall have as its primary objective the safety of passengers, crew, ground personnel and the general public … safeguarding against acts of unlawful interference with civil aviation

  4. EU Regulations • Regulation (EC) No 1254/2009 • Having regard to (EC) No 300/2008… • Article 1 – Member States may derogate from the common basic standards… and adopt alternative security measures

  5. UK Approach • Derogated ALL categories e.g. less than 10,000kg, helicopters, law enforcement and fire suppression flights, medical, emergency or rescue services, R&D, aerial work, flights by air carriers, aircraft manufacturers or maintenance companies, transporting neither passengers and baggage, nor cargo and mail. But… • Did not derogate Humanitarian Aid Flights – unless under 10,000kg And…

  6. UK Approach • Chose to sub-divide derogation category 10… • Flights with aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of less than 45,500 kilograms for the carriage of own staff and non fare-paying passengers or goods as an aid to the conduct of company business – into… • A) company owned aircraft used for company business (derogated) • B) aircraft chartered for company business (may be derogated) • C) fractionally owned aircraft used for company business (may be derogated)

  7. Demarcated Areas • A derogation may only be utilised if… • A) a regulated airport chooses to create a demarcated area (they are free to choose not to do so) • B) the airport is wholly derogated As such… • A) Alternative security measures apply • B) NaCTSO guidance applies

  8. “He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils, for time is the greatest innovator.” Francis Bacon: 1561-1620

  9. QUESTIONS…

More Related