1 / 56

A tutorial on acoustic measurements for the non-technician

A tutorial on acoustic measurements for the non-technician. Svante Granqvist Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Dept of Speech Music and Hearing (TMH) Stockholm, Sweden svante.granqvist@speech.kth.se. Today’s topics. Sound and microphones Room acoustics Calibration Recommendations.

zaviera
Download Presentation

A tutorial on acoustic measurements for the non-technician

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A tutorial on acoustic measurements for the non-technician Svante Granqvist Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Dept of Speech Music and Hearing (TMH) Stockholm, Sweden svante.granqvist@speech.kth.se

  2. Today’s topics • Sound and microphones • Room acoustics • Calibration • Recommendations www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  3. Conclusions • Use omni-directional electret or condenser microphones whenever possible • Do not use directed (e.g. cardioid) microphones unless you really need the directivity • Especially not close to the speaker • Avoid dynamic microphones • Place the microphone within the reverberation radius of the room • Keep noise level low • Establish a routine for level calibration www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  4. What is sound? • Demo of sound field • Sound pressure (pascals, Pa) • Sound pressure level, SPL (decibels, dB) • Particle velocity (metres per second, m/s) • Particle velocity level? Rarely! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  5. Sound pressure • Simple relation to sound intensity • Our ears are mainly pressure sensitive • Simple relation to distance (~1/r) • Doubled distance => halved SP <=> SPL: -6dB • Pressure has no direction • Pressure sensitive microphones are omni-directional (no directivity) • So: how do they make directed microphones? www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  6. Particle velocity • Particle velocity has a direction • So it can be used to create directivity! • Particle velocity only => figure of eight • Mainly sensitive in two directions www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  7. Cardioid • Particle velocity and sound pressure combined => cardioid • Mainly sensitive in one direction www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  8. Directivity • Omni-directional (SP only) • Directed (involves particle velocity) • Figure of eight • Cardioid • Super-cardioid • Other special directivity patterns • Great! ...or is it? www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  9. Directed microphones • We are primarily interested in sound pressure • ...but also measure particle velocity • ...then PV and SP have to be proportional to one another! • Are they? www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  10. NO! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  11. Particle velocity • Particle velocity is proportional to sound pressure, but only in the far field (~1/r) • In the close field, it differs! (~1/r2) • The limit between far and close field depends on frequency www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  12. Particle velocity • Particle velocity exhibits a bass lift in the close field • proximity effect www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  13. Proximity effect (cardioid mic) www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  14. Proximity effect • Demo www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  15. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  16. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  17. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  18. Manufacturers’ data sheets Omni-directional www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  19. Manufacturers’ data sheets • Frequency responses are mostly measured in the far field, even for microphones that obviously are intended to be mounted in the close field • You have to add the proximity effect for directed microphones to those curves! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  20. Proximity effect (cardioid mic) www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  21. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  22. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  23. Manufacturers’ data sheets Cardioid www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  24. Manufacturers’ data sheets Omni-directional www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  25. Demo • Proximity effect: • Hear the bass lift from the directed microphone www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  26. OK, point taken, he doesn’t like directed microphones • But then, why are there so many directed microphones out there? • Music industry, broadcasting, stage use etc: • A bass boost of a few dBs does not matter much or might even be desired (sound ”better”) • Noise supression may be more important than a flat frequency response • Most recordings do not have a scientific purpose www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  27. Transducer type • Electret/condenser • Can easily be made to have flat response • Cheap electret microphones (< €30 ) can be of sufficient quality • Requires battery/power supply • Sensitivity may decrease towards end of battery life • Dynamic • Difficult to acheive a flat response • Good dynamic microphones are expensive • Rarely purely pressure sensitive (even though data-sheet may say so) • No need for battery/power supply www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  28. Bottom line... • Use omni-directional, electret/condenser microphones for scientific purposes! • Make sure batteries are fresh or use some other type of power supply www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  29. Room acoustics • In a room sound originates from: • the sound source, directly • or from reflections at the walls www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  30. Room acoustics www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  31. Room acoustics • Reverberation radius, rr • The distance where reflected and direct sound are equally loud • Less absorbtion => stronger reflections => smaller rr www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  32. Room acoustics www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  33. Room acoustics • Reverberation radius • At what distance is the direct sound as loud as the sound that has been reflected from the walls • Typical value 4 – 0.5 meters • Reverberation time • How long does it take for the sound level to drop by 60 dB? • Typical value 0.5 – 4 seconds www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  34. Room acoustics • How to measure Reverberation time/radius • Several ways, one would be to record a ”bang” and see at what rate the sound level drops • The time for a 60dB drop corresponds to reverberation time • Calculate reverberation radius from this time: www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  35. Bottom line... • Within the reverberation radius, conditions are similar to free field • Outside, reflections from the walls dominate the sound • So, put the microphone (well) within the reverberation radius! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  36. Level calibration • Most common method: • Record a signal with a known level i.e. a calibration tone • By relating the level of the calibration tone to the levels of the signals of interest, absolute calibration is acheived www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  37. Calibration file, example Calibration tone ”The level was 89 dB” www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  38. CalibrationCalibrator • Procedure: • Mount and start the calibrator (2-10 seconds) • Unmount calibrator and say the level of the calibrator • Advantages: • Stable calibration tone • No sensitivity to room acoustics or surrounding noise • Disadvantage: • Calibrator that fits the microphone required • Important that the seal is tight! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  39. CalibrationLoudspeaker + SPL meter • Procedure: • Beep at 1kHz ~ 80 dB (2-10 seconds) • say the level as read on the level meter • Advantages: • Stable calibration tone • Disadvantage: • Loudspeaker + signal source reqiured • Some sensitivity to room and surrounding noise www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  40. CalibrationVoice + SPL meter • Procedure: • Sustain /a/ ~80 dB (5-10 seconds) • say the level as read on the level meter • Advantages: • No loudspeaker required • Calibration signal (voice) has approximately the same spectrum as the signals of interest • Disadvantages: • Hard to keep the level of the /a/ stable • Some sensitivity to room and surrounding noise www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  41. CalibrationVoice + SPL meter • Procedure • Sustain /a/ ~80 dB (5-10 seconds) • say the level as read on the level meter • Advantages: • No loudspeaker required • Calibration signal (voice) has approximately the same spectrum as the signals of interest • Automatic compensation for microphone distance • Disadvantage: • Hard to keep the level of the /a/ stable • Only valid for this particular distance • Some sensitivity to room and surrounding noise • dB meter should be within rr www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  42. >30cm >30cm Calibration,directed microphones ? • Only in the far field (>30 cm), but still within rr • Only for rough estimation of SPL • Never use SPL calibrators! • ”Don’t try this at home” www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  43. Distance compensation • Sound pressure drops as ~1/r • Re-calculate SPL to appear as recorded at a different distance, e.g. record at d2=5 cm, but report at d1=30 cm. • Only for omni-directional microphones! • Formula: www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  44. Bottom line... • Establish a routine for calibrations • Don’t calibrate directed microphones • Report SPL at 30 cm • Compensated or actual • Beware of the ”mixer” on most PC soundcards www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  45. Recommendationsmicrophone and room acoustics • Depend on • the purpose of recording • the recording environment • Noise • Room acoustics Example of purposes: SPL Spectrum F0 Inverse filtering HNR Perceptual evaluation www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  46. SPL • Omni-directional electret/condenser microphone • If noisy environment: • Try to attenuate the noise • Shorten microphone distance (10 cm to the side of the mouth) • Avoid directed microphones for this purpose! • Put the microphone well within the reverberation radius of the room (~rr/2) • Re-calculate or calibrate for 30 cm www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  47. Spectral properties (spectrogram) • Omni-directional electret/condenser microphone • If noisy environment: • Try to attenuate the noise • Shorten microphone distance (5-10cm to the side of the mouth) • If background noise still is a problem a directed microphone can be used, but beware of the proximity effect and keep microphone distance constant! • Put microphone well within rr www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  48. Spectral properties (LTAS, H1-H2, line spectra) • Omni-directional electret/condenser microphone • If noisy environment: • Try to attenuate the noise • Shorten microphone distance (5-10cm to the side of the mouth) • Do not use a directed microphone • Put microphone well within rr • Pay attention to reflective surfaces such as windows, manuscripts etc. Added proximity effect, cardioid at 5 cm www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  49. F0, jitter/shimmer • Any decent microphone is OK, since periodicity is independent of frequency response • If noisy environment: • Try to attenuate the noise • Shorten microphone distance (5-10 cm) • Use a directed microphone • Check if F0 algorithm is affected by a bass lift! www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

  50. Inverse filtering • Omni-directional electret/condenser microphone flower < 10 Hz • Reduce background noise as much as possible • Never use a directed microphone • Microphone distance 5-10 cm • Within rr/10 • Pay attention to reflective surfaces such as windows, manuscripts etc. • Anechoic chamber is preferred Addition of reflection to the direct signal www.speech.kth.se/~svante/pevoc5

More Related