1.45k likes | 1.68k Views
Computational models of cognitive control (I). Matthew Botvinick Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University. Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968. Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968. Structural elements. Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968. Structural elements. Control elements.
E N D
Computational models of cognitive control (I) Matthew Botvinick Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University
Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968 Structural elements
Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968 Structural elements Control elements
“Slave systems” Baddeley, 1986/2007
Norman & Shallice, 1986 Contention scheduling system
Supervisory attentional system (SAS) Norman & Shallice, 1986 Contention scheduling system
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
A R Z N K Z Q
A R Z N K Z Q
A R Z N K Z Q
A R Z N K Z Q
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks
“Executive/Cognitive Control” -- Controlled (task-guided) attention: “attention for action” (Stroop) -- Ignoring or inhibiting task-irrelevant stims/responses (Go/No-Go) -- Manipulating information in working memory (N-Back) -- Switching between tasks (Wisconsin Card Sort) -- Planning / scheduling (Tower of London) -- Navigating through extended, hierarchically structured tasks GETTING WITH (AND STAYING WITH) THE PROGRAM
GETTING WITH (AND STAYING WITH) THE PROGRAM Task Context Encoding / Formulation Maintenance Projection Updating
White & Wise, Exp Br Res, 1999 (See also: Assad, Rainer & Miller, 2000; Bunge, 2004; Hoshi, Shima & Tanji, 1998; Johnston & Everling, 2006; Wallis, Anderson & Miller, 2001; White, 1999…)
From Curtis & D’Esposito, TICS, 2003, after Funahashi et al., J. Neurophysiol,1989.
Questions… -- What about manipulation in WM, etc? -- dynamics (switching, sequences) -- what controls control? (Homunculus)