EPOS Working Group 10 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR GEORESOURCES

1. EPOS Working Group 10 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR GEORESOURCES Responseto induced seismicity studies needs Beata Orlecka-Sikora Instituteof GeophysicsPolishAcademy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland orlecka@igf.edu.pl

2. Coal Company Germany Poland France Spain SCIENCE Norway BUSINESS and INDUSTRY Finland Niedzica Hydropower Plant Sweden Italy Netherlands Czech Republik Institute of InnovativeTechnologies Switzerland Denmark GeothermieSoultz pending GeothermalExploration & Exploitation pending Song Tranh 2 Hydropower Plant

3. To facilitate a step-change in the IS research perspective from the present, technology-oriented approach, to one centred on physical problem, without losing touch with technological conditions of IS generation; • To intensify scientific • international cooperation; • To Improve research efficiency • by facilitating instantaneous • access to data, results, • interpretations and • methodologies; • To strengthen cooperation • between industry and science. Aims of WG10:

4. Mutuallybeneficial, bi-directional cooperation between industry and science • Benefits • Solutionsto manage IShazard at an economically appropriate level and to increase the economic viability of the industrial production • Increased public awareness of real IS risks • Reservoircharacterisation • Benefits • Perspective of practicioners • Experiments under different tectonic and technological conditions • Practicalfeedback. Tests of applicability of solutions in the course of real-timetechnologicalactivity I • Diverse data sets • Technical support • Posedproblems of practicalvalue • Productionknowledge S N C D I E U S N C • Scientificexpertise • Methodologies and ready-to-usesolutionsto manageseismichazard T E R Y

5. Datasetdiversity Comprehensive Episode

6. Datasetdiversity A T A D C Comprehensive Episode I M S I E S

7. Datasetdiversity G E O Comprehensive Episode D A T A

8. Datasetdiversity Comprehensive Episode P A R T O A D D U N C O T I

9. Datasetdiversity MiningInducedSeismicity CE CE CE CE ReservoirInducedSeismicity Injection / ExtractionInducedSeismicity Cases In Debate

10. MIS - Mining InducedSeismicity • IIS - Injection / ExtractionInducedSeismicity • RIS - ReservoirInducedSeismicity MIS RIS MIS MIS IIS IIS IIS MIS IIS RIS RIS

11. Data classification, attributes anddata flow

13. InducedSeismicityNode

14. The main outlines of Science Plan for Induced Seismicity Node • Similarities and particularities of seismic processes induced by different technological activities • Optimization of IS monitoring strategies • Discrimination between the induced and natural seismicity • IS response to technological activity in a long and short time-scale • From time-dependent seismic hazard assessment to hazard management. Optimizing production for hazard control. THAIS initiative • IS as a characterization tool for production enhancement • Testing procedures and benchmark tests • IS and public concern

15. General technicalarchitecture of IS Node

16. Phase 1: Implementation • Milestone ISN1-1: Coordination structure and essential staff in place • Milestone ISN1-2: Data repositories are operational • Milestone ISN1-3: Process for integration of off-line sources in place, integration activity established • Milestone ISN1-4: Process for integration of on-line sources in place • Milestone ISN1-5: Science gateway in place with data management module and at least 2 scientific pipelines integrated • Milestone ISN1-6: All IS Node services are operational, user registration open, pilot sources integrated Implementation Plan Timeline with Milestones • Phase 2: • Integration • Milestone ISN2-1: At least 15 on-line stations are integrated • Milestone ISN2-2: Integration of 10 off-line data sources completed • Milestone ISN2-3:At least 30 on-line stations are integrated • Phase 3: • Maintainanceand evolution • Milestone ISN3-1: Sustainability and developmentplan

17. Parameterization of IS node impact factor and measures of success of WG10 plan realization Science 1 Industry 2 Public 3

18. To servethe scientific sector and advance research in ISfield is a major task. Quality of research based on the IS NODE is important, and will be evaluated by other stakeholders. • Possible parameters: • No. of comprehensive case studies • No. of data/software/reports/services provided • No. of downloadsof data/software • No.of peer reviewed papersacknowledging the ISNode • No.of conference sessions, workshops, etc.on ISsubject • No.of cooperation linksbased on IS Node(industry, universities, research assoc.) • No. of expertisesbasedon IS Node 1. SCIENCE

19. The industry sector is of strategic relevance. IS may influence the operation plan. Therefore managingseismic hazard at an economically appropriate level is crucial. • Possible parameters: • Total economic value of integrated RI provided by industry • Total economic value of industrial stakeholders • Number of industrial data providers • Readiness of industrial partners to disseminate data, measured by a level of comprehensiveness of the uploaded data cases; • Number of disseminated solutions for the use by industrial stakeholders • Total economic value of science-industrycollaborative projects; • Total economic value of expertise provided 2. INDUSTRY

20. ISN aims to increase public understanding and realisticevaluation of hazards due to IS by providing expert knowledge and background information. • Possible parameters: • Number of public users of ISN; • Quality of the information portal increasing awareness, graded by users; • Number of inquiries on anthropogenic seismic hazards and risks; • Number of downloads of instructive materials onanthropogenic seismicity. 3. PUBLIC

21. THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION