1 / 43

A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings

A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings. Peter Beyersdorf Stanford University. Spring 2005 LSC meeting G050171-00-Z. Outline. Motivation for considering reflection gratings Configurations that use gratings Reflective RSE

zanna
Download Presentation

A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings Peter BeyersdorfStanford University Spring 2005 LSC meetingG050171-00-Z

  2. Outline • Motivation for considering reflection gratings • Configurations that use gratings • Reflective RSE • Reflective power recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometer • Issues with seismic noise that are unique to gratings

  3. Motivation for considering reflection gratings • Reflection gratings can be used as beamspliters or cavity couplers without the thermal deformation issues associated with absorption in the transmissive substrates of conventional beamsplitters or cavity couplers

  4. rITMrSEM DBW= DBW= 1- a 1-rITMrSEM 1-rITMrSEM rETMtITM 2 Revisiting RSE Bandwidth enhancement is limited by loss in the signal extraction cavity RSE interferometer

  5. rITMrSEM DBW= DBW= 1- a 1-rITMrSEM 1-rITMrSEM rETMtITM 2 Revisiting RSE Bandwidth enhancement is limited by loss in the signal extraction cavity RSE interferoemter Loss in the signal extraction cavity is dominated by absorbtion in the optical substrates

  6. Revisiting RSE • Rather than modify design to increase the bandwidth of the arm cavities (power recycled RSE), modify it to reduce the loss in the signal extraction cavity • Take advantage of low-loss reflection gratings to eliminate ITM substrate absorption • Reconfigure geometry to separate signal extraction cavity from the beamsplitter

  7. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities r≈0.99999… h≈10-6 Lossy beamsplitter is not inside a cavity

  8. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm koL=(n+1/2)l

  9. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm koL=(n+1/2)l

  10. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm • Signal exiting arm at output coupler is enhanced by signal from other arm

  11. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm • Signal exiting arm at output coupler is enhanced by signal from other arm

  12. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm • Signal exiting arm at output coupler is enhanced by signal from other arm • Signal extraction cavity has no lossy elements inside of it Partially transmissive mirror couples light out of the signal extraction cavity

  13. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm • Signal exiting arm at output coupler is enhanced by signal from other arm • Signal extraction cavity has no lossy elements inside of it • Laser noise is filtered by arm cavities

  14. RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is split and critically coupled into arm cavities • Carrier exiting arm at output coupler is cancelled by carrier from other arm • Signal exiting arm at output coupler is enhanced by signal from other arm • Signal extraction cavity has no lossy elements inside of it • Laser noise is filtered by arm cavities NS-NS inspiral range 187->236 MPc

  15. Other configurations with reflection gratings reflective RSE reflective power recycled RSE (Drever 1995)

  16. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity

  17. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity • Each grating arm cavity forms one end of the recycling cavity

  18. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity • Each grating arm cavity forms one end of the recycling cavity

  19. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity • Each grating arm cavity forms one end of the recycling cavity • Signal sidebands from arm cavities exit the arms in two directions

  20. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity • Each grating arm cavity forms one end of the recycling cavity • Signal sidebands from arm cavities exit the arms in two directions • Signal extraction mirror closes the signal extraction cavity path

  21. Power recycled RSE with reflection gratings • Input power is diffractively coupled into the middle of the power recycling cavity • Each grating arm cavity forms one end of the recycling cavity • Signal sidebands from arm cavities exit the arms in two directions • Signal extraction mirror closes the signal extraction cavity path • Laser technical noise follows the signal everywhere

  22. Power gain dependence on diffraction efficiency The total power gain in the arms of the grating ring RSE (loss of 1ppm per mirror and a signal tuning of 20 degrees) The left-most axis is the diffraction efficiency of the arm cavity gratings, the right-most axis is that of the recycling cavity grating

  23. Laser noise coupling to output Laser noise coupling Signal transfer function

  24. Reflection grating interferometer comparison • reflective power recycled RSE • Grating efficiency 0.001 • Laser power 25W • Poor separation of signal and laser noise • reflective RSE • Grating efficiency 10ppm • Laser power 50W • Good separation of signal and laser noise

  25. Geometry of various grating arrangements Four basic geometries that use reflection gratings ring cavity 2nd order Littrow beamsplitter 1st order Littrow

  26. Effect of seismic noise with gratings Effect of the grating’s displacement noise depends on the geometry; it is different for reflected and diffracted beams

  27. Effect of seismic noise with gratings Effect of the grating’s displacement noise depends on the geometry; it is different for reflected and diffracted beams Reference surface for reflected beam Reference surface for diffracted beam

  28. Primary isolation direction Effect of seismic noise with gratings ring cavity 2nd order Littrow beamsplitter 1st order Littrow

  29. Primary isolation direction Principle axis of inertia tensor Effect of seismic noise with gratings ring cavity 2nd order Littrow beamsplitter 1st order Littrow

  30. Effect of seismic noise with gratings Ring cavity configuration seems best suited for use in a detector: • Phase noise due to lateral displacement of grating can be cancelled to first order at low frequencies • Direction of maximum isolation requirement is aligned to principle axis of inertia tensor of the mass • Holds promise of low-loss 1% efficiency

  31. Cancellation of phase noise from transverse motion Input noise Displacement noise frequency total noise = Displacement noise frequency

  32. Cancellation of phase noise from transverse motion Input noise Cavity “transmission” x - Cavity transmission Displacement noise frequency frequency total noise = Displacement noise frequency

  33. Cancellation of phase noise from transverse motion Input noise Output noise Cavity “transmission” x - Cavity transmission Displacement noise Displacement noise frequency frequency frequency total noise = Displacement noise frequency

  34. phase of specular order relative to diffracted order in grating beamsplitter phase of diffracted order in Littrow-mount grating phase of specular order phase of twice-diffracted order phase of twice-diffracted order with time delay phase of diffracted order Upcoming experiments • Quantify effect of lateral displacement noise on phase shift in various configurations

  35. Upcoming experiments • Quantify effect of lateral displacement noise on phase shift in various configurations • Determine constraints for grating suspension • longitudinal noise performance • transverse noise performance • roll noise performance • roll positioning accuracy and range • Compare suspension requirements to Advanced LIGO suspension performance

  36. Summary With reflection gratings on core optics comes: • Promise of low loss • Capability of very high power storage • Possibility of lower loss in the signal extraction cavity • Possibility of higher storage-time arm cavities • New suspension design requirements

  37. Empirical observation: grating loss increases with increasing efficiency Lower diffraction efficiency gratings seem to be capable of having very low loss loss 99% grating grating efficiency mirror How will future detectors be optimized for use with diffractive optics?

  38. Consider phase shift on diffracted beam due to input beam displacement qin f2a qm f1a Dx

  39. Consider phase shift on diffracted beam due to input beam displacement qin f2a qm qin f1a f2b Dx

  40. Consider phase shift on diffracted beam due to input beam displacement f1b qin qm qm f1a Dx

  41. Consider phase shift on diffracted beam due to input beam displacement f1b qin f2a qm qin qm f1a f2b Dx

  42. Consider phase shift on diffracted beam due to input beam displacement f1b qin f2a qm qin qm f1a f2b Dx grating equation:

  43. If you just consider lateral translation of grating qin qm f1a f2b Dx grating equation:

More Related