Match line A to one of the three on the left

1. Match line A to one of the three on the left

2. Match line A to one of the three on the left

3. What percentage of people went along?

4. As number of confederates went beyond 3, conformity remained constantWith addition of even one supporter, it reduced drastically

5. The Effect of Screen Size on Readability Using Three Different Portable Devices Chung, Kolatch, Sculimbrene, & Wen (2000) SHORE Online Experiments, Ben Shneiderman’s class • Readability of devices • Palmtop • Rocket Book • Laptop

6. Independent Variables: 3x 2 design Portable Device (3) x Text length (2) Dependent Variable: Readability Measures: (1) Time it took to read document (2) Answer to question about document (3) User Satisfaction Survey Possible Confounding Variables: Font and size of text itself (constant) Contrast of screen (constant)

7. What are variables?Properties of objects and events that can take on different values are referred to as variables. For example: Monitor size is a variable in a study of readability. Kinds of variables:Discrete variables & continuous variables Independent, Dependent, & Confounding variables

8. Discrete variables:Discrete variables can only take on a few possible values: number of siblings, marital status etc, number of items than can be retrieved by a search engine at any time. Continuous variables:Continuous variables are those, which can take on (at least in theory) many different values between the lowest and the highest possible point: for example, visual contrast on a monitor Note. Often whether a variable is discrete or continuous depends on how it is measured

9. Independent (IV) & Dependent variables(DV):A researcher is often interested in studying the effects of an IV on some other variable, i.e., DV.An IV is manipulated by, measured or selected by the researcher in order to observer its relationship to some other variable of interest (the DV). AN IV is an antecedent condition to the observed behavior. Therefore an IV has levels, while a DV can have different measures.

10. Confounding VariablesSuch variables could affect the relationship between IV and DV thus presenting a confound in your study. For example, individual differences between people can often confound the relationship between an IV and DV.

11. Mean reading time for multiple pages Hypothetical Data:Mean reading time for multiple pages

12. Effect of text and graphic links on navigation time A SHORE Online study • IV: Kinds of links • Levels • Text • Graphic • Text&Graphic • DV: Time to find item • Confounding Variable: Differential download time

13. Hypothetical download times for different kinds of pages Solution:Use download time as a covariate in the analysis Note. this is not real data!

14. Disadvantages of measurement Problem of realism/ecological validity: It is a reductionist approach, necessarily reduces a phenomenon to a skeletal format. Has it even remained the same phenomenon? Measuring incorrectly: Measuring incorrectly is worse than not measuring (?) Training: Often requires training to do right.

15. Advantages of measurement when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind: it may be the beginning of knowledge but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the degree of science. William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, 1891, p.80 -quoted by Peter Wright @ British Computer Society -as quoted by Jakob Nielsen, 1990

16. Advantages of measurement • By assigning numbers to events, we try to be specific and concrete. • Language is inherently subjective. Numbers can often add some degree of objectivity (though numbers can be subjectively assigned as well!) • Promotes a common analytical language, encourages communication • Helps in dealing with engineers who like numbers!

17. Levels of Measurement Nominal scale • Nominal measurement consists of assigning items to groups or categories. • No quantitative information is conveyed and no ordering of the items is implied. • Nominal scales are therefore qualitative rather than quantitative. • Examples: Religious preference, race, and gender are all examples of nominal scales • Statistics: Sum, Frequency Distributions

18. Ordinal Scale • Measurements with ordinal scales are ordered: higher numbers represent higher values. • However, the intervals between the numbers are not necessarily equal. • There is no "true" zero point for ordinal scales since the zero point is chosen arbitrarily. • For example, on a five-point rating scale measuring attitudes towards online shopping, the difference between 2 and 3 may not represent the same difference as the difference between 4 and 5. • Also, lowest point was arbitrarily chosen to be 1. It could just as well have been 0 or -5.

19. Interval Scale • On interval measurement scales, one unit on the scale represents the same magnitude on the trait or characteristic being measure across the whole range of the scale. • For example, on an interval scale of anxiety, a difference between 10 and 11 would represent the same difference in anxiety as between 50 and 51. (No interval scale of anxiety exists!)

20. Ratio Scale • Ratio scales are like interval scales except they have true zero points. • For example: Kelvin scale of temperature. This scale has an absolute zero. Thus, a temperature of 300 Kelvin is twice as high as a temperature of 150 Kelvin. • Very hard to achieve! • Don’t need to worry about the distinction between interval and ratio

21. Scales of measurement in usability Physics Envy (Peter Wright, British Computer Society) Problem with measurement in usability: “a measurement, say, 12% decrease in task time might mean 12% better productivity, but could just as well mean 12% more time wasted on other activities or 12% more stress for the users. So we do not necessarily have a true ratio scale for usability measurements.” Jakob Nielsen

22. Scales of measurement in usability Physics Envy (Peter Wright, British Computer Society) Problem with measurement in usability: “a measurement, of say 12% decrease in task time might mean >>12% better productivity, but could just as well mean >>12% more time wasted on other activities or >>12% more stress for the users. So we do not necessarily have a true ratio scale for usability measurements.” Jakob Nielsen

23. Can we acheive nominal scales? Require us only to distinguish if two problems are the same or not. Unfortunately, it is hard to know to what extent two observations are really cases of the same Underlying usability problem, and we do not even have a good enumeration of usability problems with which to match observations.

24. Using the somewhat more ambitious ordinal scales to measure usability problems, we face the counting problem. We would like to know whether one interface is better than another by counting the frequencies of various usability problems in the two systems. Can we ever dream of ordinal scales?

25. Severity rated on a scale of 1 to 5 If severity is a constant, we can have ordinal mesurement Importance = Frequency x Severity

26. As you go from nominal to ratio scales, you get more information about thing being measured. Nominal Scales: DO you use CNN for online news? Yes/No Ordinal Scales: Dhow many times do you use CNN in a day? (a) 0 times a day (b) 1-5 times a day (c) more than 5 times a day Yes/No Interval/Ratio Scales: How many times do you use CNN in a day? _____ times a day

27. Independent Variables: 3x 2 design Portable Device (3) x Text length (2) Dependent Variable: Readability Measures: (1) Time it took to read document (2) Answer to question about document (3) User Satisfaction Survey Possible Confounding Variables: Font and size of text itself (constant) Contrast of screen (constant)