1 / 6

ISSU Benchmarking Methodology draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth- 02

ISSU Benchmarking Methodology draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth- 02. Sarah Banks sbanks@ aerohive.com Fernando Calabria fcalabri@cisco.com Gery Czirjak gczirjak@ juniper.net Ramdas Machat rmachat@juniper.net. IETF 88 Vancouver. 00 – Overview.

zalika
Download Presentation

ISSU Benchmarking Methodology draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth- 02

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISSU Benchmarking Methodologydraft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth-02 Sarah Bankssbanks@aerohive.comFernando Calabria fcalabri@cisco.com GeryCzirjak gczirjak@juniper.net RamdasMachatrmachat@juniper.net IETF 88 Vancouver

  2. 00 – Overview • Define a common set of methodologies to facilitate the benchmarking of an ISSU (In Service Software Upgrade / Downgrade) event • Phased approach to the entire ISSU process: • -> Pre-upgrade / downgrade verification • -> Software Download • -> Software Staging • -> Upgrade Run • -> Upgrade Acceptance - Exit Criteria • Guidance / Definitions for identifying and deploying control & data plane models required for benchmarking ISSU process • Final Report / Exit criteria in order to provide a referenceable characterization of the entire process and results

  3. 01 – Where we were • Jun-04 e-mail to the list sent by Sarah with 01 rel. notification • Addressed in 01 Draft … -> David Newman comments (upgrade / downgrade) support -> Al’s several comments: Semantics – anticipation of results / outcome – Reporting format … upgrade/downgrade rollback … others. • Always seeking additional feedback and comments, especially from network operators .

  4. 02 – Where we are today • Addressed in 02 Draft … -> Cisco (Lucien) comments regarding Data center deployments -> Housekeeping (Upgrade Run phase, intro section) • Always seeking additional feedback and comments, especially from network operators .

  5. Next Steps – 03 - future rel. • Petition the BMWG for adoption of the draft as charted work • Additional feedback requested from WG members – • There is anindustry need for a standardized methodology to benchmark ISSU functionality among vendors.

  6. Thanks ! The authors of: draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth-02

More Related