1 / 20

Well-Being at Work Partnership ASSET Pulse Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary

Well-Being at Work Partnership ASSET Pulse Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary. Gordon Tinline & Matt Smeed. Response Rate. Pulse questionnaire launched on 15 th March Open for 6 weeks with a deadline of 26 th April Overall response rate 2171/4485 = 48.4%. Response Rate.

zada
Download Presentation

Well-Being at Work Partnership ASSET Pulse Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Well-Being at Work PartnershipASSET Pulse Survey 2013Initial Results Summary Gordon Tinline & Matt Smeed

  2. Response Rate Pulse questionnaire launched on 15th March Open for 6 weeks with a deadline of 26th April Overall response rate 2171/4485 = 48.4%

  3. Response Rate • Response rates within SWYPFT: • 2009: 49.0% (smaller Trust in partnership with BDCT) • 2011: 49.6% • 2013: 48.4% • The typical response from larger NHS Trusts (larger than 4,000 employees) is 34% • Typical main drivers of lower response rates: • ‘Nothing ever happens’ • Confidentiality at risk • Clear communications • Paper surveys hard to distribute and collect • Survey fatigue

  4. The ASSET Model of Well-Being

  5. ASSET: ‘Full’ vs. ‘Pulse’

  6. 2013 ResultsCompared to General Working Population(n=2075)

  7. 6 Essentials(compared to general working population)All online respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the greater the extent to which the area is considered a stressor; black bars represent 2011 results

  8. Enablers and BarriersRaw Score Trends More Troubled

  9. Your Health(compared to general working population)All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the greater the extent to which the area is considered a stressor; black bars represent 2011 results

  10. Your HealthRaw Score Trends Poorer Health

  11. Psychological Well-Being(compared to general working population)All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the more positive the area; black bars represent 2011 results

  12. Psychological Well-BeingRaw Score Trends Positive Psychological Well-Being Sense of Purpose Note: A higher score is more positive

  13. Engagement & Related Scales(compared to general working population)All respondents (n=2075) Note: the higher the score the more positive the area; black bars represent 2011 results

  14. Engagement & Related ScalesRaw Score Trends More Engaged/Committed

  15. Snapshot Results • The following slides show the ASSET results for groups at a glance • There are two ways to read the results: • From left to right: see the results for a specific group across all ASSET measures • From top to bottom: see how each ASSET measure differs between the groups • Use the key below to see how each group scored: • All results are in comparison to the General Working Population. • The number of respondents for each group is shown in brackets. Minimum group size = 8

  16. Results Snapshot: BDU

  17. Workplace Bullying

  18. Productivity & Presenteeism Average productivity: 82.3% 57% have come to work whilst ill at least once in the last 3 months 7% have worked more than 10 days whilst ill in the last 3 months Average productivity on the days: 64.9%

  19. Well-Being Support As an employee of the Trust, who do you feel is primarily responsible for your well-being? You: 89% The Trust: 11%

  20. Analysis: Next Steps • Add paper data to analysis • Further detailed hotspot analysis • Demographic trends • Division comparisons • Build driver analyses • Qualitative analysis • Bullying actions • Additional comments • Well-Being activities • Access to results via ASSET software

More Related