1 / 15

WP6. Quality Plan

WP6. Quality Plan. Edited by January 2018. Lead Organisation: CRE.THI.DEV Participating Organisation: All partners . Project Quality Management. Tasks – deliverables: 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan 6.3 Progress reports

zachery
Download Presentation

WP6. Quality Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP6. Quality Plan Edited by January 2018

  2. Lead Organisation: CRE.THI.DEV • Participating Organisation: All partners

  3. Project Quality Management • Tasks – deliverables: • 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee • 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan • 6.3 Progress reports • 6.4 Hire External Monitor

  4. Project Quality Management • Quality Committee establishment • Kickoff meeting (February 2017) decision:

  5. Project Quality Management • Tasks – deliverables: • 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee • 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan • 6.3 Progress reports • 6.4 Hire External Monitor

  6. Project Quality Assurance • The Quality Plan was delivered in July 2017. • It describes the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of the : • Project Deliverables • Project Processes

  7. Project Processes Quality • Quality of the project processes: • Questionnaire with an assessment of the performance of the consortium and of the current state of the partnership • Internal evaluation • Every 18 months: Next evaluation April 2018 • Online survey, with the participation of all • Satisfaction survey with threshold of approval: • More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

  8. Meetings & Events • Meeting and event evaluations • Internal evaluation – after the implementation of a meeting or event • Meetings: Meeting Evaluation Questionnaire, circulated by the QM in online form • Events: Event Evaluation Questionnaire, by all partners, paper form, translated in all languages. Results tabulated sent to the QM for analysis. • Both are satisfaction surveys, with threshold of approval: • More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

  9. Meeting evaluations • Evaluation Questionnaire for the meeting in Leipzig, September 2017 • Questionnaire circulated by the QM in online form on September 21, 2017. • 20 responses were received from the participating members • Threshold of approval: • More than 70% of answers with score ≥ 3. • Average answer: 100% scored ≥ 3 • Overall, participants were satisfied with the works of the meeting (agenda, project progress) • There were some complaints about the late change of schedule, the lack of socialization among partners outside the meeting and some aspects of hospitality (catering, accommodation) • Although the overall analysis does not dictate any immediate action, results are a useful reminder to the partners-meetings’ hosts that all aspects of meetings are important for the project quality.

  10. Evaluation of the meeting in Leipzig, September 2017

  11. Training evaluations • A Training Evaluation Questionnaire is available • To be used after the end of the trainings/seminars • Using hardcopies of the standard document • Threshold: more than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3. • An updated version (v.2) of the standard training questionnaire was delivered for the trainings of the students to WP2 leader. • Results expected after each training.

  12. Event evaluations • Event Evaluation Questionnaires • Distribution in paper form • Threshold of approval: • More than 70% of answers with score ≥ 3. • The 2nd Industry – Academia Council Meeting was evaluated as an event (held in Amman, November 23, 2017) • 34 questionnaires were answered • Average answer: 100% scored ≥ 3 • The results are all positively above the threshold

  13. 2nd Academia-Industry Evaluation

  14. Project Quality Management • Tasks – deliverables: • 6.1 Establish the Quality Committee • 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan • 6.3 Progress reports • 6.4 Hire External Monitor • Presentation by Prof. Fahmi Abu Al Rub

  15. Thank you for your time! LinaTsakalou CRETHIDEV

More Related