1 / 44

Getting What You Want in End of Life Care

Getting What You Want in End of Life Care. Kenneth Brummel-Smith, M.D. Charlotte Edwards Maguire Professor and Chair, Department of Geriatrics Florida State University College of Medicine. Objectives. Describe the problem of dying in America Describe common myths about end of life care

yuval
Download Presentation

Getting What You Want in End of Life Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Getting What You Want in End of Life Care Kenneth Brummel-Smith, M.D. Charlotte Edwards Maguire Professor and Chair, Department of Geriatrics Florida State University College of Medicine

  2. Objectives • Describe the problem of dying in America • Describe common myths about end of life care • Describe steps you can take to control your life – and dying process

  3. Remaining Life Expectancy Women Men Walter LC, JAMA, 2001

  4. Heart disease Cancer Stroke Pneumonia Diabetes Falls Atherosclerosis Kidney failure COPD Cirrhosis Causes of Death (>65) Aging is personally modifiable!

  5. Truisms • Everybody’s going to die • Most people don’t want to deal with it • Doctors will always do something, especially when they aren’t sure what to do • The only way to get what you want is to plan for it

  6. Common End of Life Medicine • Hospitalization • No hospice referral • Lots of medications • Artificial nutrition (“Tube feeding”) • Intravenous tubes • CPR – cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  7. Disease Trajectory Full Function Death 50 80

  8. Artificial NutritionMyths • Prolong life • Reduce suffering • Decrease aspiration • Ordinary care

  9. Prolong Life? • 50%-68% 1 year mortality (Cowen, Callahan) • dementia • stroke • CHF • Survival same as hand fed(Mitchell) • Improvement in nutritional measures does NOT affect survival! (Golden, Kaw, Mitchel)

  10. Reduce Suffering? • Complication rate 32% - 70% (Taylor) • Those without hunger or thirst have increased pain with ANH (McCann) • Increased use of restraints • Up to 90% (Peck) • NOT significantly different with G tubes (Ciocon) • 70% had no improvement in function or subjective health status (Callahan)

  11. Decrease Aspiration? • NG tube - • 67% aspirated • 43% developed pneumonia • 66% pulled out • G tube • 44% aspirated • 56% developed pneumonia • 56% pulled out (Ciocon)

  12. Ordinary Care? • Decreased human contact (Slovenka) • Supreme Court ruling in Nancy Cruzan • Religious stands • Catholic - burdens and benefits • Jewish - impediments to dying

  13. Loaded Words • Starvation • Dying of thirst • Wasting away

  14. Benefits of Dehydration • Lack of thirst • Decreased phlegm production • Decreased urine production • Euphoria • Analgesia • Anaesthetic effect

  15. CPR – How Successful? • Television - ? • Majority – trauma • 65% children and young adults • 75% success rate • Rescue 911 - 56% used the term “miracle” • Real life - ? New England Journal of Medicine 334 (24): 1578–1582

  16. CPR in Hospitals • 14% overall survival in hospitals • 3% on general medical wards • 80% of those with restored heart rate are comatose • 50% of survivors do not want CPR again • 50% of survivors develop major depression or functional decline “survival” – leave the hospital

  17. CPR in NH • 0%-3% survival rates in NH • 4% of facilities have “No CPR” policies • 23% never initiate - call EMT

  18. Definitions • Advance Directives • Living Will • Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care • Surrogate decision maker • Mixed Advanced Directives • 5 Wishes • Advance Care Plan Document – Project Grace • Do Not Resuscitate Order-DNRO (“Yellow Form”) • POLST - an “actionable advance directive”

  19. Benefits Of Advance Directives • Discussions between family members • Clarifying preferences • Educating about risks and benefits of different treatments • Dispelling myths • Ensuring desired or preventing undesired treatments?

  20. Limitations of Advance Directives • Usually not available in clinical settings • Do not provide clear guidance to emergency personnel • Only 17% - 25% of people have them • Variations in forms • Terms may be unclear to clinicians • Don’t work – SUPPORT study Angela Fagerlin and Carl E. Schneider, “Enough: The Failure of the Living Will,” Hastings Center Report 34, no. 2 (2004): 30-42.

  21. Will Better Discussions Work? • SUPPORT Study: • System-level innovation … may offer more powerful opportunities for improvement. • Physician behavior is not altered significantly by addressing poor communication alone. • The fundamental problem may be structural and institutional. Lynn, J. Ineffectiveness of SUPPORT, JAGS, 48: 2000 Murray TH, Improving EOL-Why So Difficult? Hastings Ctr Report, 2005

  22. Why Advance Directives Are Not Followed • Drs (or family) don’t see the patient as hopelessly ill • Contents of the directive are vague • Family member is not available or unable to make the decision • Family members disagree with the person’s choice Teno, J Gen Intern Med, 1998;13:439

  23. Florida Case #1 • Madeline Neuman – 89 y/o Fl nursing home resident completed an AD • Found unresponsive – resuscitated, intubated - 3 granddaughters persuaded Drs to cease treatment – she died after 1 week in Intensive Care Unit • GDs successfully sued Joseph Morse Geriatric Center in West Palm Beach

  24. Florida Case #2 • Hanford Pinnette – 73 y/o man in ORMC in Orlando with end-stage heart failure, kidney failure and on a ventilator • Had executed an AD and named his wife as surrogate • Drs recommended ending life-sustaining Tx in accordance with his living will • Wife refused and said she could communicate with him • Hospital went to court and won – LST was stopped and he died

  25. FL Living Will - Myths • Only way to limit interventions • Have to fit one of the 3 categories • End stage disease, terminal condition, persistent vegetative state • Must have 2 physicians “decide” • Have to be incapacitated

  26. Better Option • Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment • “POLST” form

  27. Purpose of POLST • To ensure that patient preferences are followed • To provide a mechanism to communicate patient preferences for end of life treatment across treatment settings • Home Hospital Nursing home

  28. National Use of POLST

  29. What is POLST? • A physician order • Can be completed by any provider but must be signed by MD • Complements, but does not replace, other advance directives • Voluntary use, but provides a consistent, easily recognized document

  30. Basis of POLST • Discussion regarding advance care preferences • With patient • With surrogate decision maker (or proxy) if patient does not have capacity to make decision • The POLST can be changed by the surrogate, based on proper ethical principles

  31. Lee, Brummel-Smith, Meyer, Drew, London. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2000; 48:1219

  32. Newest Study • Compared NH residents with POLST to those without one • 1711 residents • Three states – Oregon, West Virginia, Wisconsin Hickman SE, et al. J Amer Geriatrics Soc, 2010

  33. Results – Orders in Chart %

  34. Section A: Resuscitation • Resuscitate • Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) • Order only apply if a person is pulseless and not breathing • Some have suggested changing this term to “AND” – Allow Natural Death

  35. Section B – Three Levels • Comfort Measures Only • Transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met • Limited Additional Interventions • Do not use intubation or artificial ventilation, avoid ICU • Full Treatment • Use intubation & ventilation, cardioversion, pacemaker insertion, ICU

  36. Sections C and D • Antibiotics • No antibiotics • Evaluate whether limits exist • Use antibiotics • IV and Artificial Nutrition • No nutrition by tube or IV fluids • Use for a defined trial period • Use long term

  37. Section E • Basis for Orders • Who was it discussed with? • A summary of the medical condition(s) • Signatures

  38. Comfort Measures Always Provided! • Each level of care starts with comfort • Each successive level includes the previous level • Even those receiving “full treatment” need comfort • SUPPORT study – majority of dying patients had untreated, but controllable symptoms

  39. Where to Keep the POLST • The front of the chart if admitted • In a red envelop on the fridge (makes it hard to read when in envelope) • Goes with resident (patient) on transfer to another facility • Comes back with resident • Photocopies stay in medical chart (or EHR) after discharge or in physician’s office

  40. FL POLST Initiative • Center for Innovative Collaboration of Medicine & Law • Marshall Kapp, J.D., MPH – Director • http://med.fsu.edu/medicinelaw/ • Alyson OdomProgram Associate850-645-9473 • Donations appreciated!

  41. References • My Mother, Your Mother: Embracing "Slow Medicine," the Compassionate Approach to Caring for Your Aging Loved Ones • Dennis McCullough • Sick to Death and Not Going to Take It Anymore • Joanne Lynn

More Related