Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Scientific researchers are the upholders of the scientific tradition. Theirs is a tremendous responsibility. As a member of this unique profession, they have to abide by a set of moral, legal and ethical standards. Ethical issues in research come in three basic categories:.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Scientific researchers are the upholders of the scientific tradition. Theirs is a tremendous responsibility. As a member of this unique profession, they have to abide by a set of moral, legal and ethical standards.
Ethical issues in research come in three basic categories:
Any research project undertaken must be:
Research must not be solely a vehicle for the career advancement of the researcher who would publish papers that would add nothing to the human body of knowledge and only a line to the researcher’s list of publications.
Public funds (your taxes paid to the researcher via a government body) or donations (e.g.your contribution to the American Cancer Society). Or
Corporate funds (IBM, UTRC. Etc.). Corporate funds of publicly listed companies are again public funds.
A researcher has the responsibility to ensure funds bestowed on him or her are not wasted. In fact the responsibility is greater than that. He or she must ensure that the best possible use is made of such funds.
A researcher therefore has the responsibility to be absolutely truthful about:
In fact a researcher should stop the project if it becomes evident that the project would not yield useful results.
A researcher also has a responsibility to science and to his/her discipline.
Some researchers spend their entire lives in pursuit of a single fact. In a professional society, it is incumbent upon all members to not only respect but actually safeguard the rights of their colleagues.
It is therefore imperative that all research done by others and used in relation with the current project be adequately and correctly referenced so that the rights of those who actually produced the results are preserved.
Referencing is also the fulfillment of a responsibility towards colleagues from another perspective.
By providing adequate referencing, your colleagues would be able to:
Remember, research is best to be thought of as collaboration not competition.
A professional researcher therefore has the responsibility to publish the results of his/her research. Unless private funding is allocated and in other words the research is privately “purchased”, the researcher has the duty to publish the findings as widely as possible. Usually in a public forum such as an academic conference or a journal.
In fact purist researchers often refrain from participating in research projects where the funding has “strings attached”. In other words if they find that they would not be allowed to choose where to publish the results.
Another important responsibility of a researcher is to never voluntarily and unnecessarily endanger the well-being of any of his or her colleagues in the course of research or as a result of it.
This is particularly true of:
The researcher’s responsibility towards his or her research subjects:
Subjects come in three categories:
In computer science, there is very little animal experimentation but human and inanimate subjects abound.
Inanimate objects have no rights. Their owners do. These rights of ownership must be preserved and respected by the researcher.
Human subjects have many rights and the researcher has many responsibilities and areas of concern with respect to them.
The responsible researcher must:
Ensure equality of risk/reward. This means that unless otherwise informed and consent received all subjects should face equal risk or reward as a consequence of their participation. A particular case of this is when the subjects are placed in two or several groups that are treated differently and one or some of these groups would receive a distinct benefit denied of the others. For example when a group would be trained in a technique whereas the control group would not.
Ensure the privacy and confidentiality of the subjects. The extent of the breach, if any, of such privacy and or confidentiality, must be discussed and agreed in writing with the subjects prior to the commencement of the project.
Ensure the subjects right to withdraw consent. This means that the subject has the right to discontinue participating in the research at any time and without necessarily giving a reason.